通过生物心理社会视角重构儿科精神健康筛查和紧急护理评估:呼吁系统级整合。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kristina Maximous, Sonja Maria, Andreia Schineanu
{"title":"通过生物心理社会视角重构儿科精神健康筛查和紧急护理评估:呼吁系统级整合。","authors":"Kristina Maximous, Sonja Maria, Andreia Schineanu","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paediatric mental health crises are an escalating burden in global emergency care, with suicide the second leading cause of death among 10-19-year-olds. Emergency settings often represent the first point of contact for children in psychological distress. However, fragmented implementation, limited use of holistic approaches, and an absence of validated screening tools in paramedicine, contribute to missed opportunities for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and sourced literature from key databases from 2004 to 2024. Included studies involved validated screening or assessment tools for children aged 0-19 used in emergency care contexts. Data were extracted, charted, and thematically analysed using a biopsychosocial (BPS) lens to evaluate tool design, clinical feasibility, and relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, identifying 21 screening and 10 assessment tools, mainly used in hospital-based emergency departments. None were applied in paramedicine. Only five tools aligned with the BPS model. Key barriers included time constraints, training deficits, care discontinuity, and limited inclusivity for culturally and linguistically diverse or neurodivergent populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an urgent need for BPS-informed, developmentally appropriate tools tailored for paramedic use to improve equitable, child-centred emergency mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reframing paediatric mental health screening and assessment in emergency care through a biopsychosocial lens: A call for system-level integration.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Maximous, Sonja Maria, Andreia Schineanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paediatric mental health crises are an escalating burden in global emergency care, with suicide the second leading cause of death among 10-19-year-olds. Emergency settings often represent the first point of contact for children in psychological distress. However, fragmented implementation, limited use of holistic approaches, and an absence of validated screening tools in paramedicine, contribute to missed opportunities for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and sourced literature from key databases from 2004 to 2024. Included studies involved validated screening or assessment tools for children aged 0-19 used in emergency care contexts. Data were extracted, charted, and thematically analysed using a biopsychosocial (BPS) lens to evaluate tool design, clinical feasibility, and relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, identifying 21 screening and 10 assessment tools, mainly used in hospital-based emergency departments. None were applied in paramedicine. Only five tools aligned with the BPS model. Key barriers included time constraints, training deficits, care discontinuity, and limited inclusivity for culturally and linguistically diverse or neurodivergent populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an urgent need for BPS-informed, developmentally appropriate tools tailored for paramedic use to improve equitable, child-centred emergency mental health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.09.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿科心理健康危机是全球紧急护理中日益加重的负担,自杀是10-19岁儿童死亡的第二大原因。紧急情况往往是心理困扰儿童的第一个接触点。然而,分散的实施、有限的整体方法使用以及在辅助医学中缺乏经过验证的筛查工具,导致错过了早期干预的机会。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法学框架和PRISMA-ScR指南,并从2004年至2024年的关键数据库中检索文献。纳入的研究涉及在紧急护理环境中使用的0-19岁儿童的有效筛查或评估工具。数据提取,绘制图表,并使用生物心理社会(BPS)透镜进行主题分析,以评估工具设计,临床可行性和相关性。结果:30项研究符合纳入标准,确定了21种筛查工具和10种评估工具,主要用于医院急诊科。均未应用于辅助医学。只有五个工具符合BPS模型。主要障碍包括时间限制、培训缺陷、护理不连续性以及文化和语言多样性或神经分化人群的有限包容性。结论:迫切需要为护理人员量身定制的bps知情、适合发展的工具,以改善公平、以儿童为中心的紧急精神卫生保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reframing paediatric mental health screening and assessment in emergency care through a biopsychosocial lens: A call for system-level integration.

Background: Paediatric mental health crises are an escalating burden in global emergency care, with suicide the second leading cause of death among 10-19-year-olds. Emergency settings often represent the first point of contact for children in psychological distress. However, fragmented implementation, limited use of holistic approaches, and an absence of validated screening tools in paramedicine, contribute to missed opportunities for early intervention.

Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and sourced literature from key databases from 2004 to 2024. Included studies involved validated screening or assessment tools for children aged 0-19 used in emergency care contexts. Data were extracted, charted, and thematically analysed using a biopsychosocial (BPS) lens to evaluate tool design, clinical feasibility, and relevance.

Results: Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, identifying 21 screening and 10 assessment tools, mainly used in hospital-based emergency departments. None were applied in paramedicine. Only five tools aligned with the BPS model. Key barriers included time constraints, training deficits, care discontinuity, and limited inclusivity for culturally and linguistically diverse or neurodivergent populations.

Conclusion: There is an urgent need for BPS-informed, developmentally appropriate tools tailored for paramedic use to improve equitable, child-centred emergency mental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信