中译本老年人友谊量表的心理测量特征。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Pei-Ting Chung, Pi-Ling Chou, Hui-Chuan Huang, Shu-Fen Wung, Pei-Chao Lin
{"title":"中译本老年人友谊量表的心理测量特征。","authors":"Pei-Ting Chung, Pi-Ling Chou, Hui-Chuan Huang, Shu-Fen Wung, Pei-Chao Lin","doi":"10.1002/nur.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural differences, along with various social and political determinants, affect the social isolation experienced by older adults. This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Traditional Chinese version of the Friendship Scale (FS-TC) and to assess its psychometric properties in relation to social isolation among Taiwanese older adults. In Phase 1, the scale underwent cultural adaptation and translation before being evaluated for face and content validity by ten older adults and five experts in nursing and geriatric care. Phase 2 involved a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 500 older adults from southern Taiwan to establish construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability. Of these participants, 100 were retested 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. The scale-level content validity index was 1.0. A confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure of the FS-TC, consisting of \"connection\" and \"isolation\" factors. The Cronbach's α for the scale was 0.82, while the intraclass correlation coefficient reached 0.96. Convergent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Social Support Scales, and the Loneliness Scale. The FS-TC showed a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 89% for predicting Lubben Social Network Scale-6 measured social isolation. An optimal cut-off score of 14.5 was identified for predicting social isolation in older adults. Overall, the FS-TC was shown to be a reliable and valid measure of social isolation, making it a valuable tool for healthcare providers and researchers assessing the severity of social isolation among Taiwanese older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Friendship Scale for Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Ting Chung, Pi-Ling Chou, Hui-Chuan Huang, Shu-Fen Wung, Pei-Chao Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cultural differences, along with various social and political determinants, affect the social isolation experienced by older adults. This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Traditional Chinese version of the Friendship Scale (FS-TC) and to assess its psychometric properties in relation to social isolation among Taiwanese older adults. In Phase 1, the scale underwent cultural adaptation and translation before being evaluated for face and content validity by ten older adults and five experts in nursing and geriatric care. Phase 2 involved a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 500 older adults from southern Taiwan to establish construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability. Of these participants, 100 were retested 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. The scale-level content validity index was 1.0. A confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure of the FS-TC, consisting of \\\"connection\\\" and \\\"isolation\\\" factors. The Cronbach's α for the scale was 0.82, while the intraclass correlation coefficient reached 0.96. Convergent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Social Support Scales, and the Loneliness Scale. The FS-TC showed a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 89% for predicting Lubben Social Network Scale-6 measured social isolation. An optimal cut-off score of 14.5 was identified for predicting social isolation in older adults. Overall, the FS-TC was shown to be a reliable and valid measure of social isolation, making it a valuable tool for healthcare providers and researchers assessing the severity of social isolation among Taiwanese older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化差异以及各种社会和政治决定因素影响到老年人所经历的社会孤立。摘要本研究旨在探讨传统中文友谊量表(FS-TC)的因子结构,并评估其与台湾老年人社会孤立相关的心理测量特性。在第一阶段,量表经过文化适应和翻译,然后由10名老年人和5名护理和老年护理专家评估面部和内容效度。第二阶段为横断面研究,选取500名来自台湾南部的老年人作为方便样本,以建立建构效度、标准效度和信度。在这些参与者中,有100人在两周后进行了重新测试,以评估重新测试的信度。量表级内容效度指数为1.0。验证性因子分析显示,FS-TC具有“连接”因子和“隔离”因子的双因子结构。量表的Cronbach’s α为0.82,类内相关系数为0.96。通过与老年抑郁量表、社会支持量表和孤独量表的显著相关,证明了收敛效度。FS-TC在预测Lubben社会网络量表-6测量的社会隔离方面显示出56%的敏感性和89%的特异性。确定了预测老年人社会隔离的最佳临界值为14.5。总体而言,FS-TC被证明是一种可靠和有效的社会孤立测量,使其成为医疗保健提供者和研究人员评估台湾老年人社会孤立严重程度的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Friendship Scale for Older Adults.

Cultural differences, along with various social and political determinants, affect the social isolation experienced by older adults. This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Traditional Chinese version of the Friendship Scale (FS-TC) and to assess its psychometric properties in relation to social isolation among Taiwanese older adults. In Phase 1, the scale underwent cultural adaptation and translation before being evaluated for face and content validity by ten older adults and five experts in nursing and geriatric care. Phase 2 involved a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 500 older adults from southern Taiwan to establish construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability. Of these participants, 100 were retested 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. The scale-level content validity index was 1.0. A confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure of the FS-TC, consisting of "connection" and "isolation" factors. The Cronbach's α for the scale was 0.82, while the intraclass correlation coefficient reached 0.96. Convergent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations with the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Social Support Scales, and the Loneliness Scale. The FS-TC showed a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 89% for predicting Lubben Social Network Scale-6 measured social isolation. An optimal cut-off score of 14.5 was identified for predicting social isolation in older adults. Overall, the FS-TC was shown to be a reliable and valid measure of social isolation, making it a valuable tool for healthcare providers and researchers assessing the severity of social isolation among Taiwanese older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信