用过程支持图研究生物系统中的组织封闭性。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Emmy Brown , Sean T. Vittadello
{"title":"用过程支持图研究生物系统中的组织封闭性。","authors":"Emmy Brown ,&nbsp;Sean T. Vittadello","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At the heart of many contemporary theories of life is the concept of biological self-organisation: organisms have to continuously produce and maintain the conditions of their own existence in order to stay alive. The way in which these varying accounts articulate this concept, however, differs quite significantly. As a result, it can be difficult to identify self-organising features within biological systems, and to compare different descriptions of such features. In this article, we develop a graph-theoretic formalism – process-enablement graphs – to study the organisational structure of living systems. A process-enablement graph is a directed graph where the vertices represent processes, the edges represent direct enablements, and a cycle within the graph captures a self-organising component of a physical system in a general and abstract way. We use our notion of a process-enablement graph to provide a concise definition of organisational closure in the language of graph theory. Further, we define a class of graph homomorphism which allows us to compare biological models as process-enablement graphs. These homomorphisms facilitate a comparison of descriptions of self-organisation in a consistent and precise manner. We apply our formalism to a range of classical theories of life including autopoiesis, <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>F</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>-systems, and autocatalytic sets. We demonstrate exactly how these models are similar, and where they differ, with respect to their organisational structure. While our current framework does not demarcate living systems from non-living ones, it does allow us to better study systems that lie in the grey area between life and non-life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying organisational closure in biological systems with process-enablement graphs\",\"authors\":\"Emmy Brown ,&nbsp;Sean T. Vittadello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>At the heart of many contemporary theories of life is the concept of biological self-organisation: organisms have to continuously produce and maintain the conditions of their own existence in order to stay alive. The way in which these varying accounts articulate this concept, however, differs quite significantly. As a result, it can be difficult to identify self-organising features within biological systems, and to compare different descriptions of such features. In this article, we develop a graph-theoretic formalism – process-enablement graphs – to study the organisational structure of living systems. A process-enablement graph is a directed graph where the vertices represent processes, the edges represent direct enablements, and a cycle within the graph captures a self-organising component of a physical system in a general and abstract way. We use our notion of a process-enablement graph to provide a concise definition of organisational closure in the language of graph theory. Further, we define a class of graph homomorphism which allows us to compare biological models as process-enablement graphs. These homomorphisms facilitate a comparison of descriptions of self-organisation in a consistent and precise manner. We apply our formalism to a range of classical theories of life including autopoiesis, <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>F</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>-systems, and autocatalytic sets. We demonstrate exactly how these models are similar, and where they differ, with respect to their organisational structure. While our current framework does not demarcate living systems from non-living ones, it does allow us to better study systems that lie in the grey area between life and non-life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosystems\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725001777\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosystems","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725001777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多当代生命理论的核心是生物自组织的概念:生物体必须不断地生产和维持自身存在的条件才能生存。然而,这些不同的说法表达这一概念的方式却大相径庭。因此,很难识别生物系统中的自组织特征,也很难比较对这些特征的不同描述。在这篇文章中,我们发展了一个图论的形式主义-过程实现图-来研究生命系统的组织结构。过程支持图是一个有向图,其中顶点表示过程,边表示直接支持,图中的循环以一般和抽象的方式捕获物理系统的自组织组件。我们使用过程支持图的概念,以图论语言提供组织闭包的简明定义。此外,我们定义了一类图同态,它允许我们将生物模型作为过程支持图进行比较。这些同态有助于以一致和精确的方式比较自组织的描述。我们将我们的形式主义应用于一系列经典的生命理论,包括自创生,(F, a)系统和自催化集。我们准确地展示了这些模型的相似之处,以及它们在组织结构方面的不同之处。虽然我们目前的框架不能区分生命系统和非生命系统,但它确实允许我们更好地研究处于生命和非生命之间灰色地带的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying organisational closure in biological systems with process-enablement graphs
At the heart of many contemporary theories of life is the concept of biological self-organisation: organisms have to continuously produce and maintain the conditions of their own existence in order to stay alive. The way in which these varying accounts articulate this concept, however, differs quite significantly. As a result, it can be difficult to identify self-organising features within biological systems, and to compare different descriptions of such features. In this article, we develop a graph-theoretic formalism – process-enablement graphs – to study the organisational structure of living systems. A process-enablement graph is a directed graph where the vertices represent processes, the edges represent direct enablements, and a cycle within the graph captures a self-organising component of a physical system in a general and abstract way. We use our notion of a process-enablement graph to provide a concise definition of organisational closure in the language of graph theory. Further, we define a class of graph homomorphism which allows us to compare biological models as process-enablement graphs. These homomorphisms facilitate a comparison of descriptions of self-organisation in a consistent and precise manner. We apply our formalism to a range of classical theories of life including autopoiesis, (F,A)-systems, and autocatalytic sets. We demonstrate exactly how these models are similar, and where they differ, with respect to their organisational structure. While our current framework does not demarcate living systems from non-living ones, it does allow us to better study systems that lie in the grey area between life and non-life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosystems
Biosystems 生物-生物学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
129
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: BioSystems encourages experimental, computational, and theoretical articles that link biology, evolutionary thinking, and the information processing sciences. The link areas form a circle that encompasses the fundamental nature of biological information processing, computational modeling of complex biological systems, evolutionary models of computation, the application of biological principles to the design of novel computing systems, and the use of biomolecular materials to synthesize artificial systems that capture essential principles of natural biological information processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信