迷宫自适应严肃游戏:评估自闭症谱系障碍患者运动康复的表现和可用性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alexandre Kira, Rodrigo G Pontes, Augusto K Pedroso de Lima, Luciano V Araújo, Carlos B M Monteiro, Elisa de Jesus Valenzuela, Victoria Yanara Hernandes da Silva, Juliana Perez Weingartner, Íbis Ariana Peña de Moraes, Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo, Fátima L S Nunes
{"title":"迷宫自适应严肃游戏:评估自闭症谱系障碍患者运动康复的表现和可用性。","authors":"Alexandre Kira, Rodrigo G Pontes, Augusto K Pedroso de Lima, Luciano V Araújo, Carlos B M Monteiro, Elisa de Jesus Valenzuela, Victoria Yanara Hernandes da Silva, Juliana Perez Weingartner, Íbis Ariana Peña de Moraes, Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo, Fátima L S Nunes","doi":"10.1177/2161783X251378518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the effectiveness of <i>MazeOut</i>, an adaptive serious game for motor rehabilitation, in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), by comparing their performance and usability with that of individuals with typical development (TD) and assessing the impact of adaptive (AG) versus nonadaptive gameplay on task performance. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A mixed-design study with 30 participants (15 ASD, 15 TD), aged 8 to 40 years, had each participant experience both adaptive and nonadaptive interventions in randomized order, allowing within- and between-subject comparisons. Performance was measured using overall scores (based on maze navigation speed and coin collection), and usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data analysis was conducted using R software, with performance trends evaluated through segmented regression and the Kruskal-Wallis test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The TD group outperformed the ASD group across all conditions (TD median score: 27.54; ASD median score: 23.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Notably, participants in both groups achieved significantly better performance when AG was introduced first (ASD: 24.04 vs. 19.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001; TD: 30.2 vs. 24.31, <i>P</i> = 0.005), suggesting that the adaptation facilitates initial task learning. ASD participants reported slightly higher usability (mean SUS = 77.2) than TD participants (74.6), with the highest scores among younger users (81.9). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Adaptive serious games can enhance motor performance, particularly for individuals with ASD. The findings suggest that early exposure to AG may improve task performance. Future studies with larger samples and longer interventions are needed to assess long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47401,"journal":{"name":"Games for Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MazeOut Adaptive Serious Game: Evaluation of Performance and Usability for Motor Rehabilitation in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Kira, Rodrigo G Pontes, Augusto K Pedroso de Lima, Luciano V Araújo, Carlos B M Monteiro, Elisa de Jesus Valenzuela, Victoria Yanara Hernandes da Silva, Juliana Perez Weingartner, Íbis Ariana Peña de Moraes, Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo, Fátima L S Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2161783X251378518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the effectiveness of <i>MazeOut</i>, an adaptive serious game for motor rehabilitation, in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), by comparing their performance and usability with that of individuals with typical development (TD) and assessing the impact of adaptive (AG) versus nonadaptive gameplay on task performance. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A mixed-design study with 30 participants (15 ASD, 15 TD), aged 8 to 40 years, had each participant experience both adaptive and nonadaptive interventions in randomized order, allowing within- and between-subject comparisons. Performance was measured using overall scores (based on maze navigation speed and coin collection), and usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data analysis was conducted using R software, with performance trends evaluated through segmented regression and the Kruskal-Wallis test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The TD group outperformed the ASD group across all conditions (TD median score: 27.54; ASD median score: 23.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Notably, participants in both groups achieved significantly better performance when AG was introduced first (ASD: 24.04 vs. 19.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001; TD: 30.2 vs. 24.31, <i>P</i> = 0.005), suggesting that the adaptation facilitates initial task learning. ASD participants reported slightly higher usability (mean SUS = 77.2) than TD participants (74.6), with the highest scores among younger users (81.9). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Adaptive serious games can enhance motor performance, particularly for individuals with ASD. The findings suggest that early exposure to AG may improve task performance. Future studies with larger samples and longer interventions are needed to assess long-term benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Games for Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Games for Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2161783X251378518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Games for Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2161783X251378518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体与典型发展(TD)个体在运动康复方面的表现和可用性,以及评估自适应(AG)与非自适应(AG)游戏对任务表现的影响,评价自适应严肃游戏MazeOut在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体中的效果。材料和方法:一项有30名参与者(15名ASD, 15名TD)的混合设计研究,年龄在8至40岁之间,每个参与者按随机顺序经历适应性和非适应性干预,允许受试者内部和受试者之间的比较。游戏表现采用总分(基于迷宫导航速度和硬币收集)来衡量,可用性采用系统可用性量表(SUS)来评估。使用R软件进行数据分析,通过分段回归和Kruskal-Wallis检验评估性能趋势。结果:TD组在所有情况下均优于ASD组(TD中位评分:27.54;ASD中位评分:23.79,P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,首先引入AG时,两组参与者的表现都明显更好(ASD: 24.04 vs. 19.1, P < 0.001; TD: 30.2 vs. 24.31, P = 0.005),这表明适应促进了初始任务学习。ASD参与者报告的可用性(平均SUS = 77.2)略高于TD参与者(74.6),其中年轻用户得分最高(81.9)。结论:适应性严肃游戏可以提高运动表现,特别是对于ASD患者。研究结果表明,早期接触AG可能会提高任务表现。未来的研究需要更大的样本和更长时间的干预来评估长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MazeOut Adaptive Serious Game: Evaluation of Performance and Usability for Motor Rehabilitation in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of MazeOut, an adaptive serious game for motor rehabilitation, in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), by comparing their performance and usability with that of individuals with typical development (TD) and assessing the impact of adaptive (AG) versus nonadaptive gameplay on task performance. Materials and Methods: A mixed-design study with 30 participants (15 ASD, 15 TD), aged 8 to 40 years, had each participant experience both adaptive and nonadaptive interventions in randomized order, allowing within- and between-subject comparisons. Performance was measured using overall scores (based on maze navigation speed and coin collection), and usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data analysis was conducted using R software, with performance trends evaluated through segmented regression and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The TD group outperformed the ASD group across all conditions (TD median score: 27.54; ASD median score: 23.79, P < 0.001). Notably, participants in both groups achieved significantly better performance when AG was introduced first (ASD: 24.04 vs. 19.1, P < 0.001; TD: 30.2 vs. 24.31, P = 0.005), suggesting that the adaptation facilitates initial task learning. ASD participants reported slightly higher usability (mean SUS = 77.2) than TD participants (74.6), with the highest scores among younger users (81.9). Conclusions: Adaptive serious games can enhance motor performance, particularly for individuals with ASD. The findings suggest that early exposure to AG may improve task performance. Future studies with larger samples and longer interventions are needed to assess long-term benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Games for Health Journal is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the impact of game research, technologies, and applications on human health and well-being. This ground-breaking publication delivers original research that directly impacts this emerging, widely-recognized, and increasingly adopted area of healthcare. Games are rapidly becoming an important tool for improving health behaviors ranging from healthy lifestyle habits and behavior modification, to self-management of illness and chronic conditions to motivating and supporting physical activity. Games are also increasingly used to train healthcare professionals in methods for diagnosis, medical procedures, patient monitoring, as well as for responding to epidemics and natural disasters. Games for Health Journal is a must for anyone interested in the research and design of health games that integrate well-tested, evidence-based behavioral health strategies to help improve health behaviors and to support the delivery of care. Games for Health Journal coverage includes: -Nutrition, weight management, obesity -Disease prevention, self-management, and adherence -Cognitive, mental, emotional, and behavioral health -Games in home-to-clinic telehealth systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信