Cagri Akpinar, Digdem Kuru Oz, Eriz Ozden, Nuray Haliloglu, Basak Gulpinar, Muhammed Arif Ibis, Muratcan Karaburun, Mehmet Fatih Ozkaya, Efe Turgut, Omer Gulpinar, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Suer, Sumer Baltaci
{"title":"融合靶向前列腺活检在高容量前列腺中难以捉摸的小直径病变的临床意义前列腺癌检测中的作用:认知和融合靶向技术的比较。","authors":"Cagri Akpinar, Digdem Kuru Oz, Eriz Ozden, Nuray Haliloglu, Basak Gulpinar, Muhammed Arif Ibis, Muratcan Karaburun, Mehmet Fatih Ozkaya, Efe Turgut, Omer Gulpinar, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Suer, Sumer Baltaci","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Cagri Akpinar, Digdem Kuru Oz, Eriz Ozden, Nuray Haliloglu, Basak Gulpinar, Muhammed Arif Ibis, Muratcan Karaburun, Mehmet Fatih Ozkaya, Efe Turgut, Omer Gulpinar, Mehmet Ilker Gokce, Evren Suer, Sumer Baltaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价融合活检在难以捉摸的小直径病变,特别是大体积前列腺中,是否具有检测临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)的优势。材料与方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2024年1月在单中心前列腺活检前行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查的762例患者的资料。所有患者均由2名经验丰富的放射科医师分别行认知融合联合靶向活检、可疑病变系统活检及经直肠超声引导下系统活检(所有标本均完成组织病理学评价)。病变按直径(≤5mm、6- 10mm、>0 mm)和前列腺体积(≤30ml、31- 70ml、>70 mL)分类。(所有患者均行3T mpMRI检查,并用PI-RADS v2.1对病变进行评分。PI-RADS评分最高的最大病变被认为是指数病变。)结果:患者特征,包括临床和放射学特征,在认知和融合活检组之间是平衡的。PI-RADS分层对3、4、5种PI-RADS病变的检出率相似。对于≤5mm的病变,融合活检的csPCa检出率明显高于认知活检(16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033)。认知活检组病变≤5 mm,前列腺体积> ~ 30 ml未检出有临床意义的前列腺癌。对于6- 10mm和bbb10mm的病变,两种手术的检出率相当。结论:MRI融合靶向活检对于较小的病变和精确病灶定位至关重要的情况特别有利。然而,对于较大的病变或有熟练操作人员的机构,认知靶向活检仍然是一个可行和有效的选择。
The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.
Objective: To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.
Material and methods: Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.
Conclusion: MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.