基于ECOG表现状态的微创小肝切除术术后预后-多机构数据库分析。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Parit T Mavani, Subir Goyal, Melissa E Hogg, Ashwin S Kamath, David A Iannitti, Kerri A Simo, W Scott Helton, Pablo E Serrano, Edwin O Onkeni, David A Geller, Patricio M Polanco, Kevin El-Hayek, Susanne G Warner, Sean P Cleary, Adnan Alseidi, Mohammad Y Zaidi, Maria C Russell, Felipe Maegawa, Kevin T Nguyen, Juan M Sarmiento, Shishir K Maithel, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah
{"title":"基于ECOG表现状态的微创小肝切除术术后预后-多机构数据库分析。","authors":"Parit T Mavani, Subir Goyal, Melissa E Hogg, Ashwin S Kamath, David A Iannitti, Kerri A Simo, W Scott Helton, Pablo E Serrano, Edwin O Onkeni, David A Geller, Patricio M Polanco, Kevin El-Hayek, Susanne G Warner, Sean P Cleary, Adnan Alseidi, Mohammad Y Zaidi, Maria C Russell, Felipe Maegawa, Kevin T Nguyen, Juan M Sarmiento, Shishir K Maithel, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12184-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to open liver resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is a fast, reproducible patient selection tool used to guide therapy. We compared patient outcomes after MILR by ECOG PS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-cirrhotic patients undergoing MILR resection at one of 14 North American healthcare centers were identified from the Americas Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (AMILES) database (2010-2024). Perioperative outcomes were compared between ECOG1 and ECOG2 patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify factors independently associated with postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,181 patients, 486 met our inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 62 years. Four-hundred twenty-eight patients (88.1%) were ECOG1. Overall postoperative complication rate was not lower in ECOG 1 patients compared to ECOG 2 patients on univariate (20.3 vs. 29.1%, p = 0.17), and MVA (aOR 0.60, p = 0.14). Robotic versus laparoscopic approach (aOR 0.52, p = 0.03) and use of intraoperative ablation versus no ablation (aOR 0.38, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of postoperative complications. Intraoperative conversion from MILR to open was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications (aOR 2.22, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In non-cirrhotic patients with ECOG2 performance status, minimally invasive minor liver resection may be considered with an acceptable complication rate similar to ECOG1 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative outcomes with minimally invasive minor hepatectomy based on ECOG performance status - analysis of multi-institutional database.\",\"authors\":\"Parit T Mavani, Subir Goyal, Melissa E Hogg, Ashwin S Kamath, David A Iannitti, Kerri A Simo, W Scott Helton, Pablo E Serrano, Edwin O Onkeni, David A Geller, Patricio M Polanco, Kevin El-Hayek, Susanne G Warner, Sean P Cleary, Adnan Alseidi, Mohammad Y Zaidi, Maria C Russell, Felipe Maegawa, Kevin T Nguyen, Juan M Sarmiento, Shishir K Maithel, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12184-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to open liver resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is a fast, reproducible patient selection tool used to guide therapy. We compared patient outcomes after MILR by ECOG PS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-cirrhotic patients undergoing MILR resection at one of 14 North American healthcare centers were identified from the Americas Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (AMILES) database (2010-2024). Perioperative outcomes were compared between ECOG1 and ECOG2 patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify factors independently associated with postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,181 patients, 486 met our inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 62 years. Four-hundred twenty-eight patients (88.1%) were ECOG1. Overall postoperative complication rate was not lower in ECOG 1 patients compared to ECOG 2 patients on univariate (20.3 vs. 29.1%, p = 0.17), and MVA (aOR 0.60, p = 0.14). Robotic versus laparoscopic approach (aOR 0.52, p = 0.03) and use of intraoperative ablation versus no ablation (aOR 0.38, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of postoperative complications. Intraoperative conversion from MILR to open was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications (aOR 2.22, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In non-cirrhotic patients with ECOG2 performance status, minimally invasive minor liver resection may be considered with an acceptable complication rate similar to ECOG1 patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12184-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12184-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与开放性肝切除术相比,微创肝切除术(MILR)术后并发症较少。东部肿瘤合作组织(ECOG)的表现状态(PS)是一个快速,可重复的患者选择工具,用于指导治疗。方法:从美洲微创肝脏手术(AMILES)数据库(2010-2024)中确定了在14家北美医疗中心之一接受MILR切除术的非肝硬化患者。比较ECOG1和ECOG2患者围手术期预后。采用多变量分析(MVA)确定与术后并发症独立相关的因素。结果:在4181例患者中,486例符合我们的纳入标准。患者中位年龄为62岁。428例(88.1%)为ECOG1。ECOG 1组患者术后并发症发生率与ECOG 2组患者在单因素(20.3 vs 29.1%, p = 0.17)和MVA (aOR 0.60, p = 0.14)上均不低于ECOG 1组患者。机器人入路与腹腔镜入路(aOR 0.52, p = 0.03)、术中使用消融术与不使用消融术(aOR 0.38, p = 0.03)均与术后并发症发生率降低相关。术中从MILR转为开放与术后并发症发生率增加相关(aOR 2.22, p = 0.04)。结论:对于ECOG2功能状态的非肝硬化患者,可以考虑微创小肝切除术,其并发症发生率与ECOG1患者相似,可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative outcomes with minimally invasive minor hepatectomy based on ECOG performance status - analysis of multi-institutional database.

Objective: Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to open liver resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is a fast, reproducible patient selection tool used to guide therapy. We compared patient outcomes after MILR by ECOG PS.

Methods: Non-cirrhotic patients undergoing MILR resection at one of 14 North American healthcare centers were identified from the Americas Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (AMILES) database (2010-2024). Perioperative outcomes were compared between ECOG1 and ECOG2 patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify factors independently associated with postoperative complications.

Results: Of 4,181 patients, 486 met our inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 62 years. Four-hundred twenty-eight patients (88.1%) were ECOG1. Overall postoperative complication rate was not lower in ECOG 1 patients compared to ECOG 2 patients on univariate (20.3 vs. 29.1%, p = 0.17), and MVA (aOR 0.60, p = 0.14). Robotic versus laparoscopic approach (aOR 0.52, p = 0.03) and use of intraoperative ablation versus no ablation (aOR 0.38, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of postoperative complications. Intraoperative conversion from MILR to open was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications (aOR 2.22, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: In non-cirrhotic patients with ECOG2 performance status, minimally invasive minor liver resection may be considered with an acceptable complication rate similar to ECOG1 patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信