一线舒尼替治疗转移性肾细胞癌,一项15年的单机构真实世界证据研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mohammad Haman, Johanne Ahrenfeldt, Iben Lyskjær, Niels Fristrup
{"title":"一线舒尼替治疗转移性肾细胞癌,一项15年的单机构真实世界证据研究。","authors":"Mohammad Haman, Johanne Ahrenfeldt, Iben Lyskjær, Niels Fristrup","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the introduction of immuno-oncology (IO) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy, sunitinib has become a rarely used drug because of its inferiority demonstrated in a number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, limited studies has investigated the long-term outcomes of first-line sunitinib for mRCC. This study represents the first retrospective Danish real-world evidence (RWE) study evaluating the effect of sunitinib in first line in mRCC patients, PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 268 patients over a 15 year period. Clinical data from patients treated with sunitinib for mRCC from 01-01-2010 to 30-05-2024 were extracted from a mRCC registry at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patient data was collected through medical record review. The data was managed in RedCap. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted for the entire cohort. All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.3.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all patients, mPFS was 8.43 months (95% CI: 6.47-11.23) and mOS was 18.60 months (95% CI: 14.73-22.80). In the favorable risk group (IMDC = 0), mPFS reached 26.26 months (95% CI: 16.52-43.67) and mOS 57.73 months (95% CI: 38.62-75.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to other RWEs, our PFS and OS for all patients fell within the spectrum of previously published results. IMDC risk group was identified as the most significant factor for PFS and OS. PFS and OS for IMDC favorable-risk patients were among the highest reported in existing RWE studies. Importantly, we found sunitinib monotherapy to be an effective treatment in IMDC favorable-risk patients, comparable to published IO-TKI results, supporting its use, especially seen in relation to price.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a 15-year single institution real-world evidence study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Haman, Johanne Ahrenfeldt, Iben Lyskjær, Niels Fristrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the introduction of immuno-oncology (IO) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy, sunitinib has become a rarely used drug because of its inferiority demonstrated in a number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, limited studies has investigated the long-term outcomes of first-line sunitinib for mRCC. This study represents the first retrospective Danish real-world evidence (RWE) study evaluating the effect of sunitinib in first line in mRCC patients, PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 268 patients over a 15 year period. Clinical data from patients treated with sunitinib for mRCC from 01-01-2010 to 30-05-2024 were extracted from a mRCC registry at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patient data was collected through medical record review. The data was managed in RedCap. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted for the entire cohort. All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.3.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all patients, mPFS was 8.43 months (95% CI: 6.47-11.23) and mOS was 18.60 months (95% CI: 14.73-22.80). In the favorable risk group (IMDC = 0), mPFS reached 26.26 months (95% CI: 16.52-43.67) and mOS 57.73 months (95% CI: 38.62-75.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to other RWEs, our PFS and OS for all patients fell within the spectrum of previously published results. IMDC risk group was identified as the most significant factor for PFS and OS. PFS and OS for IMDC favorable-risk patients were among the highest reported in existing RWE studies. Importantly, we found sunitinib monotherapy to be an effective treatment in IMDC favorable-risk patients, comparable to published IO-TKI results, supporting its use, especially seen in relation to price.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着免疫肿瘤学(IO)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合治疗的引入,舒尼替尼因其在许多随机临床试验(rct)中显示的劣效性而成为很少使用的药物。然而,有限的研究调查了一线舒尼替尼治疗mRCC的长期结果。该研究是丹麦首个回顾性真实世界证据(RWE)研究,评估了舒尼替尼在一线mRCC患者中的疗效。患者和方法:该研究共纳入268例患者,历时15年。2010年1月1日至2024年5月30日期间接受舒尼替尼治疗mRCC患者的临床数据摘自丹麦奥胡斯大学医院临床肿瘤科mRCC登记处。通过病历审查收集患者资料。数据在RedCap中进行管理。使用Kaplan-Meier (KM)方法估计中位总生存期(mOS)和无进展生存期(mPFS)。对整个队列进行多变量Cox比例风险回归分析。所有统计分析均在R 4.3.3版本中进行。结果:所有患者的mPFS为8.43个月(95% CI: 6.47-11.23), mOS为18.60个月(95% CI: 14.73-22.80)。有利风险组(IMDC = 0), mPFS达26.26个月(95% CI: 16.52 ~ 43.67), mOS达57.73个月(95% CI: 38.62 ~ 75.31)。结论:与其他RWEs相比,我们所有患者的PFS和OS都在先前发表的结果范围内。IMDC风险组是影响PFS和OS的最重要因素。在现有的RWE研究中,IMDC有利风险患者的PFS和OS是最高的。重要的是,我们发现舒尼替尼单药治疗在IMDC有利风险患者中是一种有效的治疗方法,与已发表的IO-TKI结果相当,支持其使用,特别是在价格方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-line sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a 15-year single institution real-world evidence study.

Background: With the introduction of immuno-oncology (IO) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy, sunitinib has become a rarely used drug because of its inferiority demonstrated in a number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, limited studies has investigated the long-term outcomes of first-line sunitinib for mRCC. This study represents the first retrospective Danish real-world evidence (RWE) study evaluating the effect of sunitinib in first line in mRCC patients, PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 268 patients over a 15 year period. Clinical data from patients treated with sunitinib for mRCC from 01-01-2010 to 30-05-2024 were extracted from a mRCC registry at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patient data was collected through medical record review. The data was managed in RedCap. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted for the entire cohort. All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.3.3.

Results: For all patients, mPFS was 8.43 months (95% CI: 6.47-11.23) and mOS was 18.60 months (95% CI: 14.73-22.80). In the favorable risk group (IMDC = 0), mPFS reached 26.26 months (95% CI: 16.52-43.67) and mOS 57.73 months (95% CI: 38.62-75.31).

Conclusions: When compared to other RWEs, our PFS and OS for all patients fell within the spectrum of previously published results. IMDC risk group was identified as the most significant factor for PFS and OS. PFS and OS for IMDC favorable-risk patients were among the highest reported in existing RWE studies. Importantly, we found sunitinib monotherapy to be an effective treatment in IMDC favorable-risk patients, comparable to published IO-TKI results, supporting its use, especially seen in relation to price.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信