危重儿童贫血的试点优化输血治疗:一项多中心电子健康记录支持的危重儿童红细胞输血的试点随机对照试验

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003822
Marisa Tucci, Avishay Sarfatti, Stéphane Leteurtre, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau, Patricia Fontela, Samiran Ray, Simon J Stanworth, Paul C Hébert, Nadia Roumeliotis, Michaël Sauthier, Philip C Spinella, Thierry Ducruet, Philippe Jouvet, Benoît Mâsse, Nancy Robitaille, Helen Trottier, Jacques Lacroix
{"title":"危重儿童贫血的试点优化输血治疗:一项多中心电子健康记录支持的危重儿童红细胞输血的试点随机对照试验","authors":"Marisa Tucci, Avishay Sarfatti, Stéphane Leteurtre, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau, Patricia Fontela, Samiran Ray, Simon J Stanworth, Paul C Hébert, Nadia Roumeliotis, Michaël Sauthier, Philip C Spinella, Thierry Ducruet, Philippe Jouvet, Benoît Mâsse, Nancy Robitaille, Helen Trottier, Jacques Lacroix","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large international electronic health record-enabled randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare two strategies for RBC transfusion (RBCT) in almost all anemic critically ill children, and the ability to support data abstraction from electronic medical data monitoring systems (eMDMSs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm parallel design pilot RCT.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four university-affiliated PICUs in Canada, France, and United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Non-cyanotic critically ill children with hemoglobin (Hb) less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to a restrictive strategy (no RBCT if Hb ≥ 7.0 g/dL) or to usual care (clinician discretion for RBCT).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, adherence, separation of pre-RBCT Hb, and electronic data extraction from eMDMS. The proportion of patients with Hb less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL who were eligible for consent to participate in Pilot-Optimizing Transfusion Therapy in Critically Ill Children With Anemia (P-OpTTICCA) was 83% (feasibility criterion: ≥ 80%). We enrolled 120 patients, 63 in the restrictive and 57 in the usual care arms. We reached the planned recruitment rate (≥ 2 participants/wk in sites with > 800 admissions/yr, ≥ 1 in other sites). The pre-RBCT Hb concentration was 6.6 ± 7 and 6.7 ± 1.3 g/dL in the restrictive and usual care arms, respectively (separation = 0.1 g/dL; desired difference ≥ 1.0 g/dL). The pre-transfusion Hb concentration was greater than or equal to 7.0 g/dL for 6 of 20 RBCT (30%) given to patients allocated to the restrictive arm (success criterion for protocol adherence: < 20%). There were two protocol deviations, but no protocol violation. Using eMDMS, 87.7% of the 390 data elements in the case report form were extracted and/or calculated electronically (success criterion: > 80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P-OpTTICCA demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment, adherence, and electronic data extraction, but we did not get a good separation of pre-RBCT Hb. Future trials need to clearly define transfusion Hb thresholds in both trial arms (NCT03871244).</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1218-e1230"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot-Optimizing Transfusion Therapy in Critically Ill Children With Anemia: A Pilot Multicenter Electronic Health Record-Enabled Randomized Controlled Trial on Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Critically Ill Children.\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Tucci, Avishay Sarfatti, Stéphane Leteurtre, Geneviève Du Pont-Thibodeau, Patricia Fontela, Samiran Ray, Simon J Stanworth, Paul C Hébert, Nadia Roumeliotis, Michaël Sauthier, Philip C Spinella, Thierry Ducruet, Philippe Jouvet, Benoît Mâsse, Nancy Robitaille, Helen Trottier, Jacques Lacroix\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large international electronic health record-enabled randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare two strategies for RBC transfusion (RBCT) in almost all anemic critically ill children, and the ability to support data abstraction from electronic medical data monitoring systems (eMDMSs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm parallel design pilot RCT.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four university-affiliated PICUs in Canada, France, and United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Non-cyanotic critically ill children with hemoglobin (Hb) less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to a restrictive strategy (no RBCT if Hb ≥ 7.0 g/dL) or to usual care (clinician discretion for RBCT).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, adherence, separation of pre-RBCT Hb, and electronic data extraction from eMDMS. The proportion of patients with Hb less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL who were eligible for consent to participate in Pilot-Optimizing Transfusion Therapy in Critically Ill Children With Anemia (P-OpTTICCA) was 83% (feasibility criterion: ≥ 80%). We enrolled 120 patients, 63 in the restrictive and 57 in the usual care arms. We reached the planned recruitment rate (≥ 2 participants/wk in sites with > 800 admissions/yr, ≥ 1 in other sites). The pre-RBCT Hb concentration was 6.6 ± 7 and 6.7 ± 1.3 g/dL in the restrictive and usual care arms, respectively (separation = 0.1 g/dL; desired difference ≥ 1.0 g/dL). The pre-transfusion Hb concentration was greater than or equal to 7.0 g/dL for 6 of 20 RBCT (30%) given to patients allocated to the restrictive arm (success criterion for protocol adherence: < 20%). There were two protocol deviations, but no protocol violation. Using eMDMS, 87.7% of the 390 data elements in the case report form were extracted and/or calculated electronically (success criterion: > 80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P-OpTTICCA demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment, adherence, and electronic data extraction, but we did not get a good separation of pre-RBCT Hb. Future trials need to clearly define transfusion Hb thresholds in both trial arms (NCT03871244).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1218-e1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估开展一项大型国际电子健康记录随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验旨在比较几乎所有贫血危重症儿童输血(RBCT)的两种策略,以及支持从电子医疗数据监测系统(emdms)提取数据的能力。设计:双臂平行设计先导RCT。环境:加拿大、法国和英国的四所大学附属picu。患者:血红蛋白(Hb)小于或等于9.5 g/dL的非紫绀型危重患儿。干预措施:参与者被随机分配到限制性策略(如果Hb≥7.0 g/dL则不进行RBCT)或常规护理(临床医生自行决定RBCT)。测量和主要结果:可行性结果包括招募、依从性、rbct前Hb的分离以及从eMDMS中提取电子数据。Hb小于或等于9.5 g/dL的患者有资格同意参加“危重症贫血儿童输血治疗试点优化”(P-OpTTICCA)的比例为83%(可行性标准:≥80%)。我们招募了120名患者,63名在限制性治疗组,57名在常规治疗组。我们达到了计划的招募率(≥2人/周,在招生人数为800人/年的站点,≥1人/周)。限制性治疗组和常规治疗组rbct前Hb浓度分别为6.6±7和6.7±1.3 g/dL(分离= 0.1 g/dL;期望差异≥1.0 g/dL)。输注前Hb浓度大于或等于7.0 g/dL的20例RBCT患者中有6例(30%)被分配到限制性组(方案遵守的成功标准:< 20%)。有两个协议偏差,但没有违反协议。使用eMDMS,病例报告表格中的390个数据元素中有87.7%被电子提取和/或计算(成功标准:> 80%)。结论:P-OpTTICCA证明了招募、粘附性和电子数据提取的可行性,但我们没有很好地分离rbct前的Hb。未来的试验需要明确定义两个试验组的输血Hb阈值(NCT03871244)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot-Optimizing Transfusion Therapy in Critically Ill Children With Anemia: A Pilot Multicenter Electronic Health Record-Enabled Randomized Controlled Trial on Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Critically Ill Children.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large international electronic health record-enabled randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare two strategies for RBC transfusion (RBCT) in almost all anemic critically ill children, and the ability to support data abstraction from electronic medical data monitoring systems (eMDMSs).

Design: Two-arm parallel design pilot RCT.

Setting: Four university-affiliated PICUs in Canada, France, and United Kingdom.

Patients: Non-cyanotic critically ill children with hemoglobin (Hb) less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL.

Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to a restrictive strategy (no RBCT if Hb ≥ 7.0 g/dL) or to usual care (clinician discretion for RBCT).

Measurements and main results: Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, adherence, separation of pre-RBCT Hb, and electronic data extraction from eMDMS. The proportion of patients with Hb less than or equal to 9.5 g/dL who were eligible for consent to participate in Pilot-Optimizing Transfusion Therapy in Critically Ill Children With Anemia (P-OpTTICCA) was 83% (feasibility criterion: ≥ 80%). We enrolled 120 patients, 63 in the restrictive and 57 in the usual care arms. We reached the planned recruitment rate (≥ 2 participants/wk in sites with > 800 admissions/yr, ≥ 1 in other sites). The pre-RBCT Hb concentration was 6.6 ± 7 and 6.7 ± 1.3 g/dL in the restrictive and usual care arms, respectively (separation = 0.1 g/dL; desired difference ≥ 1.0 g/dL). The pre-transfusion Hb concentration was greater than or equal to 7.0 g/dL for 6 of 20 RBCT (30%) given to patients allocated to the restrictive arm (success criterion for protocol adherence: < 20%). There were two protocol deviations, but no protocol violation. Using eMDMS, 87.7% of the 390 data elements in the case report form were extracted and/or calculated electronically (success criterion: > 80%).

Conclusions: P-OpTTICCA demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment, adherence, and electronic data extraction, but we did not get a good separation of pre-RBCT Hb. Future trials need to clearly define transfusion Hb thresholds in both trial arms (NCT03871244).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信