单室膝关节置换术的现代观点:一篇编辑评论。

Amyn M Rajani, Ashok Shyam
{"title":"单室膝关节置换术的现代观点:一篇编辑评论。","authors":"Amyn M Rajani, Ashok Shyam","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.5992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has emerged as a reliable, bone-preserving option for patients with isolated compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). Initially limited by poor early outcomes and narrow indications, advances in implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique have led to a resurgence in its use. Contemporary diagnostics rely on precise clinical and imaging assessments to confirm unicompartmental disease while ruling out contraindications. Importantly, traditional exclusion criteria, such as age under 60, high body mass index, patellofemoral OA, anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, and chondrocalcinosis, are being re-evaluated in light of newer evidence, suggesting they are not absolute barriers in all patients. Operative options now include cemented and cementless fixation, fixed- and mobile-bearing designs, and all-polyethylene versus metal-backed components, each with specific advantages and limitations. Robotic-assisted techniques offer improved alignment accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional manual approaches, potentially enhancing survivorship, although cost and learning curve remain considerations. Post-operative protocols support early mobilization and weight-bearing, facilitating faster recovery than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Return to sports activity is generally higher after UKA, meeting the expectations of increasingly active patient populations. Surgeon-related factors, particularly experience and case volume, significantly influence outcomes, underscoring the importance of appropriate training and patient selection. As the understanding of UKA indications and techniques continues to evolve, it offers a compelling, less invasive alternative to TKA for well-selected patients. This editorial review highlights current best practices, emerging evidence, and ongoing challenges in optimizing outcomes for UKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 9","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Perspectives on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Editorial Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amyn M Rajani, Ashok Shyam\",\"doi\":\"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.5992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has emerged as a reliable, bone-preserving option for patients with isolated compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). Initially limited by poor early outcomes and narrow indications, advances in implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique have led to a resurgence in its use. Contemporary diagnostics rely on precise clinical and imaging assessments to confirm unicompartmental disease while ruling out contraindications. Importantly, traditional exclusion criteria, such as age under 60, high body mass index, patellofemoral OA, anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, and chondrocalcinosis, are being re-evaluated in light of newer evidence, suggesting they are not absolute barriers in all patients. Operative options now include cemented and cementless fixation, fixed- and mobile-bearing designs, and all-polyethylene versus metal-backed components, each with specific advantages and limitations. Robotic-assisted techniques offer improved alignment accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional manual approaches, potentially enhancing survivorship, although cost and learning curve remain considerations. Post-operative protocols support early mobilization and weight-bearing, facilitating faster recovery than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Return to sports activity is generally higher after UKA, meeting the expectations of increasingly active patient populations. Surgeon-related factors, particularly experience and case volume, significantly influence outcomes, underscoring the importance of appropriate training and patient selection. As the understanding of UKA indications and techniques continues to evolve, it offers a compelling, less invasive alternative to TKA for well-selected patients. This editorial review highlights current best practices, emerging evidence, and ongoing challenges in optimizing outcomes for UKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.5992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.5992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单腔室膝关节置换术(UKA)已成为孤立腔室膝骨关节炎(OA)患者可靠的保骨选择。最初由于早期预后不佳和适应症狭窄,植入物设计、患者选择和手术技术的进步导致其使用的复苏。当代诊断依靠精确的临床和影像学评估来确认单室疾病,同时排除禁忌症。重要的是,传统的排除标准,如年龄在60岁以下、高体重指数、髌股骨关节炎、前交叉韧带缺乏和软骨钙质沉着症,正在根据新的证据重新评估,表明它们并不是所有患者的绝对障碍。现在的手术选择包括骨水泥和非骨水泥固定,固定和移动轴承设计,全聚乙烯与金属支撑部件,每种都有其特定的优点和局限性。与传统的人工方法相比,机器人辅助技术提供了更高的对准精度和可重复性,潜在地提高了生存率,尽管成本和学习曲线仍然需要考虑。术后方案支持早期活动和负重,促进比全膝关节置换术(TKA)更快的恢复。UKA后恢复体育活动的比例普遍较高,满足了越来越活跃的患者群体的期望。外科医生的相关因素,特别是经验和病例数量,显著影响结果,强调了适当培训和患者选择的重要性。随着对UKA适应症和技术的理解不断发展,它为精心挑选的患者提供了一种令人信服的、侵入性较小的TKA替代方案。这篇社论综述强调了优化UKA结果的当前最佳实践、新出现的证据和持续的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern Perspectives on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Editorial Review.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has emerged as a reliable, bone-preserving option for patients with isolated compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). Initially limited by poor early outcomes and narrow indications, advances in implant design, patient selection, and surgical technique have led to a resurgence in its use. Contemporary diagnostics rely on precise clinical and imaging assessments to confirm unicompartmental disease while ruling out contraindications. Importantly, traditional exclusion criteria, such as age under 60, high body mass index, patellofemoral OA, anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, and chondrocalcinosis, are being re-evaluated in light of newer evidence, suggesting they are not absolute barriers in all patients. Operative options now include cemented and cementless fixation, fixed- and mobile-bearing designs, and all-polyethylene versus metal-backed components, each with specific advantages and limitations. Robotic-assisted techniques offer improved alignment accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional manual approaches, potentially enhancing survivorship, although cost and learning curve remain considerations. Post-operative protocols support early mobilization and weight-bearing, facilitating faster recovery than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Return to sports activity is generally higher after UKA, meeting the expectations of increasingly active patient populations. Surgeon-related factors, particularly experience and case volume, significantly influence outcomes, underscoring the importance of appropriate training and patient selection. As the understanding of UKA indications and techniques continues to evolve, it offers a compelling, less invasive alternative to TKA for well-selected patients. This editorial review highlights current best practices, emerging evidence, and ongoing challenges in optimizing outcomes for UKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信