2区TEVAR的原位激光开窗:15年的经验证明其安全性,有效性和耐久性。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
William Montgomery, Fletcher Pierce, Fanny S Alie-Cusson, Ahmad Alsheekh, Hosam F El Sayed, Jean M Panneton
{"title":"2区TEVAR的原位激光开窗:15年的经验证明其安全性,有效性和耐久性。","authors":"William Montgomery, Fletcher Pierce, Fanny S Alie-Cusson, Ahmad Alsheekh, Hosam F El Sayed, Jean M Panneton","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In situ laser fenestration (ISLF) of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is a simple and effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization. However, long-term outcome data for this technique are lacking. This study presents our expanded experience with long-term outcomes of ISLF of the LSA in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR with LSA revascularization by ISLF was performed (2009-2023). This technique was performed through retrograde percutaneous or open brachial arterial access. A thoracic endograft was deployed in zone 2 followed by ISLF using a 2.3 mm laser. A balloon expandable covered stent was placed across the fenestration and post-dilated. Postoperative clinical follow-up and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reviewed to assess our endpoints. Primary endpoint was fenestration-related endoleak reintervention (type Ic or IIIc). Secondary endpoints were early and late stroke rates, LSA stent patency, fenestration-related mortality (FRM) and aorta-related mortality (ARM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>81 patients were included in our series (48 males (59%), mean age 60.9 ±12.8 years). Indication for intervention was type B aortic dissection in 67 patients (82.7%). 92% of all interventions were urgent or emergent, with 19 patients presenting with rupture (23.5%). ISLF was successfully performed in all 81 cases. Median operative time was 153 minutes. Post-intervention stroke occurred in 3 patients (3.7%) and spinal cord injury in 6 patients (7.4%, 3 transient, 3 permanent). There were 9 operative mortalities (11.1%). Median clinical follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.6), and median imaging follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.5). 3 patients (3.7%) were found to have a type 1c endoleak and underwent distal extension of the LSA stent at 6.6, 23.6, and 30.2 months postoperatively. Importantly, there was no fenestration-related type IIIc endoleak or mortality. Primary LSA stent patency was 100% at 1 year, 96.7% at 5 years and 91.1% at 10 years. Freedom from fenestration-related endoleak reintervention was 98.4% at 1-year, 93.2% at 5 years and 93.2% at 10 years. There was only 1 late-aortic-related death (1.4%) secondary to multiorgan failure on postoperative day 77 after visceral debranching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ISLF for LSA revascularization is a safe, reproducible, and durable treatment option in TEVAR requiring proximal seal in zone 2. ISLF carries an excellent technical success rate, low fenestration-related complications, and competitive long-term stent patency. Low stroke rate and short operative time further support ISLF as an effective surgical technique for LSA revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Situ Laser Fenestration for Zone 2 TEVAR: A 15 Year Experience Demonstrating Its Safety, Efficacy, and Durability.\",\"authors\":\"William Montgomery, Fletcher Pierce, Fanny S Alie-Cusson, Ahmad Alsheekh, Hosam F El Sayed, Jean M Panneton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In situ laser fenestration (ISLF) of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is a simple and effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization. However, long-term outcome data for this technique are lacking. This study presents our expanded experience with long-term outcomes of ISLF of the LSA in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR with LSA revascularization by ISLF was performed (2009-2023). This technique was performed through retrograde percutaneous or open brachial arterial access. A thoracic endograft was deployed in zone 2 followed by ISLF using a 2.3 mm laser. A balloon expandable covered stent was placed across the fenestration and post-dilated. Postoperative clinical follow-up and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reviewed to assess our endpoints. Primary endpoint was fenestration-related endoleak reintervention (type Ic or IIIc). Secondary endpoints were early and late stroke rates, LSA stent patency, fenestration-related mortality (FRM) and aorta-related mortality (ARM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>81 patients were included in our series (48 males (59%), mean age 60.9 ±12.8 years). Indication for intervention was type B aortic dissection in 67 patients (82.7%). 92% of all interventions were urgent or emergent, with 19 patients presenting with rupture (23.5%). ISLF was successfully performed in all 81 cases. Median operative time was 153 minutes. Post-intervention stroke occurred in 3 patients (3.7%) and spinal cord injury in 6 patients (7.4%, 3 transient, 3 permanent). There were 9 operative mortalities (11.1%). Median clinical follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.6), and median imaging follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.5). 3 patients (3.7%) were found to have a type 1c endoleak and underwent distal extension of the LSA stent at 6.6, 23.6, and 30.2 months postoperatively. Importantly, there was no fenestration-related type IIIc endoleak or mortality. Primary LSA stent patency was 100% at 1 year, 96.7% at 5 years and 91.1% at 10 years. Freedom from fenestration-related endoleak reintervention was 98.4% at 1-year, 93.2% at 5 years and 93.2% at 10 years. There was only 1 late-aortic-related death (1.4%) secondary to multiorgan failure on postoperative day 77 after visceral debranching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ISLF for LSA revascularization is a safe, reproducible, and durable treatment option in TEVAR requiring proximal seal in zone 2. ISLF carries an excellent technical success rate, low fenestration-related complications, and competitive long-term stent patency. Low stroke rate and short operative time further support ISLF as an effective surgical technique for LSA revascularization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:左锁骨下动脉原位激光开窗术是一种简单有效的左锁骨下动脉血运重建术。然而,缺乏这种技术的长期结果数据。本研究介绍了我们在胸椎2区血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)中对LSA的ISLF的长期结果的扩展经验。方法:2009-2023年,对所有连续接受2区TEVAR并经ISLF进行LSA血运重建术的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。该技术通过逆行经皮或开放肱动脉通路进行。在2区放置胸内移植物,然后使用2.3毫米激光进行ISLF。在开窗处放置一个可膨胀的球囊覆盖支架并进行后扩张。我们回顾了术后临床随访和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)来评估我们的终点。主要终点为开窗相关的再干预(Ic型或IIIc型)。次要终点是早期和晚期卒中发生率、LSA支架通畅、开窗相关死亡率(FRM)和主动脉相关死亡率(ARM)。结果:81例患者入组,其中男性48例(59%),平均年龄60.9±12.8岁。干预指征为B型主动脉夹层67例(82.7%)。92%的干预是紧急或紧急的,有19例患者出现破裂(23.5%)。81例均成功行ISLF。中位手术时间为153分钟。干预后发生脑卒中3例(3.7%),脊髓损伤6例(7.4%),暂时性3例,永久性3例。手术死亡9例(11.1%)。临床随访中位数为4.3年(范围0-12.6),影像学随访中位数为4.3年(范围0-12.5)。3例患者(3.7%)发现1c型内漏,分别于术后6.6、23.6和30.2个月行LSA支架远端延伸术。重要的是,没有与开窗相关的IIIc型渗漏或死亡率。原发性LSA支架1年通畅率为100%,5年为96.7%,10年为91.1%。开窗相关再干预的自由度在1年为98.4%,5年为93.2%,10年为93.2%。在内脏去分支术后第77天,继发于多器官衰竭的晚期主动脉相关死亡仅有1例(1.4%)。结论:对于需要近端2区封闭的TEVAR, ISLF用于LSA血运重建术是一种安全、可重复和持久的治疗选择。ISLF具有优异的技术成功率、低的开窗相关并发症和竞争性的长期支架通畅性。低卒中率和短手术时间进一步支持ISLF作为LSA血运重建的有效手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Situ Laser Fenestration for Zone 2 TEVAR: A 15 Year Experience Demonstrating Its Safety, Efficacy, and Durability.

Introduction: In situ laser fenestration (ISLF) of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is a simple and effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization. However, long-term outcome data for this technique are lacking. This study presents our expanded experience with long-term outcomes of ISLF of the LSA in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Methods: A single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR with LSA revascularization by ISLF was performed (2009-2023). This technique was performed through retrograde percutaneous or open brachial arterial access. A thoracic endograft was deployed in zone 2 followed by ISLF using a 2.3 mm laser. A balloon expandable covered stent was placed across the fenestration and post-dilated. Postoperative clinical follow-up and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reviewed to assess our endpoints. Primary endpoint was fenestration-related endoleak reintervention (type Ic or IIIc). Secondary endpoints were early and late stroke rates, LSA stent patency, fenestration-related mortality (FRM) and aorta-related mortality (ARM).

Results: 81 patients were included in our series (48 males (59%), mean age 60.9 ±12.8 years). Indication for intervention was type B aortic dissection in 67 patients (82.7%). 92% of all interventions were urgent or emergent, with 19 patients presenting with rupture (23.5%). ISLF was successfully performed in all 81 cases. Median operative time was 153 minutes. Post-intervention stroke occurred in 3 patients (3.7%) and spinal cord injury in 6 patients (7.4%, 3 transient, 3 permanent). There were 9 operative mortalities (11.1%). Median clinical follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.6), and median imaging follow-up was 4.3 years (range 0-12.5). 3 patients (3.7%) were found to have a type 1c endoleak and underwent distal extension of the LSA stent at 6.6, 23.6, and 30.2 months postoperatively. Importantly, there was no fenestration-related type IIIc endoleak or mortality. Primary LSA stent patency was 100% at 1 year, 96.7% at 5 years and 91.1% at 10 years. Freedom from fenestration-related endoleak reintervention was 98.4% at 1-year, 93.2% at 5 years and 93.2% at 10 years. There was only 1 late-aortic-related death (1.4%) secondary to multiorgan failure on postoperative day 77 after visceral debranching.

Conclusions: ISLF for LSA revascularization is a safe, reproducible, and durable treatment option in TEVAR requiring proximal seal in zone 2. ISLF carries an excellent technical success rate, low fenestration-related complications, and competitive long-term stent patency. Low stroke rate and short operative time further support ISLF as an effective surgical technique for LSA revascularization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信