Darmadi Darmadi, Dina Aprillia Ariestine, Herwindo Ahmad, Yan Indra Fajar Sitepu
{"title":"鞘氨醇-1-磷酸受体调节剂治疗炎症性肠病的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Darmadi Darmadi, Dina Aprillia Ariestine, Herwindo Ahmad, Yan Indra Fajar Sitepu","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v18i2.3134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated condition that remains challenging to manage. S1P receptor modulators offer a novel therapeutic approach by targeting immune cell trafficking, potentially improving disease outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library major electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating S1P receptor modulators in IBD. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, and serious adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs with a total of 2,597 patients were included. S1P receptor modulators significantly improved clinical remission (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001), histologic remission (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31-2.31, p < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, p < 0.001), and clinical response (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54, p = 0.01). The risk of serious adverse events did not significantly differ between treatment and placebo groups (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.92-1.80, p = 0.14), suggesting a favorable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports S1P receptor modulators, particularly ozanimod and etrasimod, as effective and safe treatments for UC. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and direct comparisons with existing biologic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"18 2","pages":"120-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Darmadi Darmadi, Dina Aprillia Ariestine, Herwindo Ahmad, Yan Indra Fajar Sitepu\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/ghfbb.v18i2.3134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated condition that remains challenging to manage. S1P receptor modulators offer a novel therapeutic approach by targeting immune cell trafficking, potentially improving disease outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library major electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating S1P receptor modulators in IBD. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, and serious adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs with a total of 2,597 patients were included. S1P receptor modulators significantly improved clinical remission (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001), histologic remission (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31-2.31, p < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, p < 0.001), and clinical response (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54, p = 0.01). The risk of serious adverse events did not significantly differ between treatment and placebo groups (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.92-1.80, p = 0.14), suggesting a favorable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis supports S1P receptor modulators, particularly ozanimod and etrasimod, as effective and safe treatments for UC. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and direct comparisons with existing biologic therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"120-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v18i2.3134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v18i2.3134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价鞘氨醇-1-磷酸(S1P)受体调节剂治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)的疗效和安全性。背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)是一种慢性免疫介导的疾病,仍然具有挑战性。S1P受体调节剂通过靶向免疫细胞运输提供了一种新的治疗方法,可能改善疾病的预后。方法:通过检索PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆主要电子数据库,对研究IBD中S1P受体调节剂的随机对照试验(rct)进行系统综述和荟萃分析。评估的临床结果包括临床缓解、临床反应、内镜改善、组织学缓解和严重不良事件。使用固定效应模型计算合并优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验,共2597例患者。S1P受体调节剂显著改善临床缓解(OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001)、组织学缓解(OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31-2.31, p < 0.001)、内镜改善(OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, p < 0.001)和临床反应(OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54, p = 0.01)。严重不良事件的风险在治疗组和安慰剂组之间没有显著差异(OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.92-1.80, p = 0.14),表明具有良好的安全性。结论:该荟萃分析支持S1P受体调节剂,特别是ozanimod和etrasimod是UC的有效和安全的治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来评估长期安全性和与现有生物疗法的直接比较。
Efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).
Background: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated condition that remains challenging to manage. S1P receptor modulators offer a novel therapeutic approach by targeting immune cell trafficking, potentially improving disease outcomes.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library major electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating S1P receptor modulators in IBD. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, and serious adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model.
Results: Seven RCTs with a total of 2,597 patients were included. S1P receptor modulators significantly improved clinical remission (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.84, p < 0.001), histologic remission (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31-2.31, p < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.04, p < 0.001), and clinical response (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54, p = 0.01). The risk of serious adverse events did not significantly differ between treatment and placebo groups (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.92-1.80, p = 0.14), suggesting a favorable safety profile.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports S1P receptor modulators, particularly ozanimod and etrasimod, as effective and safe treatments for UC. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and direct comparisons with existing biologic therapies.