Katherine Yoh , Vrunda B. Desai , Cary P. Gross , Erica S. Spatz , Craig Evan Pollack , Jason D. Wright , Xiao Xu
{"title":"医生在产后时机性输卵管切除术和间歇绝育以降低卵巢癌风险的差异。","authors":"Katherine Yoh , Vrunda B. Desai , Cary P. Gross , Erica S. Spatz , Craig Evan Pollack , Jason D. Wright , Xiao Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine variation in physician adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for patients undergoing tubal sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified patients age 18–49 undergoing postpartum or interval sterilization between January 2011–June 2022. Risk-adjusted rate of OS was estimated for each physician-year. Subsequently, we used group-based trajectory models to identify latent groups of physicians following distinct patterns of uptake and examined factors associated with the distinct trajectory patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 383,338 <em>postpartum sterilizations</em> (7550 physicians), OS increased from 0.1 % in 2011 to 14.3 % in 2022. Two physician adoption trajectories emerged: low (81.9 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.049 % in 2011 and 6.1 % in 2022) and high (18.1 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.02 % in 2011 and 55.3 % in 2022) adoption. Likewise, among 136,965 <em>interval sterilizations</em> (3401 physicians), OS rose from 1.4 % in 2011 to 65.9 % in 2022 with nearly equal number of physicians in the low (50.1 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 25.7 % in 2022) and high (49.9 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 95.8 % in 2022) adoption groups. Physicians with these distinct trajectories differed significantly in rural/urban location, geographic region, surgical volume, and patient composition. In particular, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of Black patients was associated with lower odds of high adoption for both postpartum (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.82–0.96) and interval (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94) sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While OS increased over time, a substantial proportion of physicians remained low adopters. Geographic and demographic differences in adoption suggest potential inequitable access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician variation in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of postpartum and interval sterilization for ovarian cancer risk reduction\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Yoh , Vrunda B. Desai , Cary P. Gross , Erica S. Spatz , Craig Evan Pollack , Jason D. Wright , Xiao Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.08.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine variation in physician adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for patients undergoing tubal sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified patients age 18–49 undergoing postpartum or interval sterilization between January 2011–June 2022. Risk-adjusted rate of OS was estimated for each physician-year. Subsequently, we used group-based trajectory models to identify latent groups of physicians following distinct patterns of uptake and examined factors associated with the distinct trajectory patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 383,338 <em>postpartum sterilizations</em> (7550 physicians), OS increased from 0.1 % in 2011 to 14.3 % in 2022. Two physician adoption trajectories emerged: low (81.9 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.049 % in 2011 and 6.1 % in 2022) and high (18.1 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.02 % in 2011 and 55.3 % in 2022) adoption. Likewise, among 136,965 <em>interval sterilizations</em> (3401 physicians), OS rose from 1.4 % in 2011 to 65.9 % in 2022 with nearly equal number of physicians in the low (50.1 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 25.7 % in 2022) and high (49.9 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 95.8 % in 2022) adoption groups. Physicians with these distinct trajectories differed significantly in rural/urban location, geographic region, surgical volume, and patient composition. In particular, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of Black patients was associated with lower odds of high adoption for both postpartum (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.82–0.96) and interval (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94) sterilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While OS increased over time, a substantial proportion of physicians remained low adopters. Geographic and demographic differences in adoption suggest potential inequitable access.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825009916\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825009916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physician variation in adopting opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of postpartum and interval sterilization for ovarian cancer risk reduction
Objectives
To examine variation in physician adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for patients undergoing tubal sterilization.
Study design
Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified patients age 18–49 undergoing postpartum or interval sterilization between January 2011–June 2022. Risk-adjusted rate of OS was estimated for each physician-year. Subsequently, we used group-based trajectory models to identify latent groups of physicians following distinct patterns of uptake and examined factors associated with the distinct trajectory patterns.
Results
Among 383,338 postpartum sterilizations (7550 physicians), OS increased from 0.1 % in 2011 to 14.3 % in 2022. Two physician adoption trajectories emerged: low (81.9 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.049 % in 2011 and 6.1 % in 2022) and high (18.1 % of physicians; rate of OS: 0.02 % in 2011 and 55.3 % in 2022) adoption. Likewise, among 136,965 interval sterilizations (3401 physicians), OS rose from 1.4 % in 2011 to 65.9 % in 2022 with nearly equal number of physicians in the low (50.1 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 25.7 % in 2022) and high (49.9 %; rate of OS: 0.6 % in 2011 and 95.8 % in 2022) adoption groups. Physicians with these distinct trajectories differed significantly in rural/urban location, geographic region, surgical volume, and patient composition. In particular, a 10-percentage-point increase in the proportion of Black patients was associated with lower odds of high adoption for both postpartum (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.82–0.96) and interval (aOR: 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.84–0.94) sterilization.
Conclusions
While OS increased over time, a substantial proportion of physicians remained low adopters. Geographic and demographic differences in adoption suggest potential inequitable access.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published.
Research Areas Include:
• Cell and molecular biology
• Chemotherapy
• Cytology
• Endocrinology
• Epidemiology
• Genetics
• Gynecologic surgery
• Immunology
• Pathology
• Radiotherapy