缬沙坦和氨氯地平两种制剂在中国健康志愿者空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学和生物等效性

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yu-Ying Xu, Wen-Tan Xu, Wei-Ping Pan, Xie-Li Guo, Xiao-Min Li, Su-Mei Xu, Shao-Wei Yan, Wen-Ke Cai, Xin-Bin Yan, Wen-Jing Zhong, Shi-Lin Chen, Ping-Sheng Xu
{"title":"缬沙坦和氨氯地平两种制剂在中国健康志愿者空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学和生物等效性","authors":"Yu-Ying Xu, Wen-Tan Xu, Wei-Ping Pan, Xie-Li Guo, Xiao-Min Li, Su-Mei Xu, Shao-Wei Yan, Wen-Ke Cai, Xin-Bin Yan, Wen-Jing Zhong, Shi-Lin Chen, Ping-Sheng Xu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (C<sub>max</sub>) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan and Amlodipine Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Ying Xu, Wen-Tan Xu, Wei-Ping Pan, Xie-Li Guo, Xiao-Min Li, Su-Mei Xu, Shao-Wei Yan, Wen-Ke Cai, Xin-Bin Yan, Wen-Jing Zhong, Shi-Lin Chen, Ping-Sheng Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CV<sub>W</sub> < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (C<sub>max</sub>) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1597\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了缬沙坦和氨氯地平(80/ 5mg)片在空腹和喂养条件下在中国健康受试者体内的药代动力学(PK)和生物等效性(BE)。进行了一项随机、开放标签、四期交叉试验,参与者在14天的洗脱期中接受测试(T)或参考(R)配方。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定缬沙坦和氨氯地平的血浆浓度。采用对照平均生物等效性(RSABE)评价高变异性参数(CVW≥30%)和低变异性参数(CVW < 30%)的生物等效性(ABE)。在空腹条件下,采用RSABE方法评估缬沙坦的最大血浆药物浓度(Cmax),并证明生物等效性。对于氨氯地平,通过传统的ABE分析建立生物等效性,Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的几何平均比(GMRs)的90%置信区间(CIs)均位于预定义的等效边界内。在餐后条件下,两种药物都符合ABE的BE标准,90%的GMRs ci在可接受范围内。重要的是,餐后给药导致试验和参考制剂中缬沙坦全身暴露量显著减少约30%。所有不良事件均为轻微且短暂的。T和R制剂表现出生物等效性和良好的耐受性,支持其互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan and Amlodipine Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) of valsartan and amlodipine (80/5 mg) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, open-label, four-period crossover trial was conducted, with participants receiving test (T) or reference (R) formulations in cycles separated by a 14-day washout. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and amlodipine were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were analyzed noncompartmentally, and BE was evaluated using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) for high-variability parameters (CVW ≥ 30%) and average bioequivalence (ABE) for low-variability parameters (CVW < 30%). Under fasting conditions, the maximum concentration of drug in blood plasma (Cmax) of valsartan was assessed using RSABE methodology and demonstrated bioequivalence. For amlodipine, bioequivalence was established through conventional ABE analysis, with the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ all residing within the predefined equivalence boundaries. Under postprandial conditions, both drugs met BE criteria using ABE, with 90% CIs of GMRs within the acceptable range. Importantly, postprandial administration resulted in a significant reduction of approximately 30% in systemic exposure of valsartan for both test and reference formulations. All adverse events were mild and transient. The T and R formulations demonstrated bioequivalence and were well tolerated, supporting their interchangeability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信