Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
{"title":"支持地区为疫苗接种运动工作人员实施数字支付的效果:乌干达2022年脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种运动期间的一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05684081.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 Suppl 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05684081.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 Suppl 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.
Introduction: A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.
Methods: In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.
Results: E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.
Conclusion: Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.