支持地区为疫苗接种运动工作人员实施数字支付的效果:乌干达2022年脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种运动期间的一项随机对照试验。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
{"title":"支持地区为疫苗接种运动工作人员实施数字支付的效果:乌干达2022年脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种运动期间的一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05684081.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 Suppl 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05684081.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 Suppl 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:一支积极和满意的卫生工作队伍对于针对脊髓灰质炎等疾病的大规模疫苗接种运动的成功至关重要。本研究调查了在2022年乌干达口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗接种运动期间,支持地区实施电子现金(e-cash)支付而不是现金,是否增加了电子现金的使用,并提高了疫苗运动卫生保健工作者(VCHWs)的积极性和满意度。方法:于2022年11月随机入组54个地区2665名vchw。干预地区接受了政府电子现金平台导航、用户角色、受益人数据上传和支付报告生成方面的培训。控制地区得到标准支援。收集的数据包括支付方式(现金或电子现金)、VCHW动机(主要结果)和对支付方式的满意度。初步分析以意向治疗为基础,对照组589名(44.1%)vchw和干预区765名(57.5%)vchw接受电子现金。结果:干预区电子现金支付比例(765/1330,57.5%)高于对照组(589/1335,44.1%)。干预地区的VCHWs更倾向于通过电子现金支付(调整OR (AOR) 3.15;95% CI: 0.40 ~ 10.70;p = 0.079)。几乎所有的vchw(97.6%)在活动完成后都收到了付款。两组间的动机(AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 ~ 1.44; p=0.498)和满意度(AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 ~ 1.55; p=0.641)无显著差异。与会者认为电子现金方便、透明、省时、节约成本。结论:支持地区实施数字支付增加了疫苗接种工作者的电子现金使用,尽管存在延迟。然而,它并没有显著影响动机或满意度。试验注册号:NCT05684081。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.

The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.

Introduction: A motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.

Methods: In November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.

Results: E-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.

Conclusion: Supporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction.

Trial registration number: NCT05684081.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信