低收入和中等收入国家卫生系统应对能力:重新审视其范围。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Meesha Iqbal, Robert Morgan, Cici Bauer, Cecilia Ganduglia Cazaban, Sameen Siddiqi
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家卫生系统应对能力:重新审视其范围。","authors":"Meesha Iqbal, Robert Morgan, Cici Bauer, Cecilia Ganduglia Cazaban, Sameen Siddiqi","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health systems responsiveness (HSR) addresses the legitimate non-health expectations of the population and plays a vital role in strengthening health systems and enhancing population health. Identifying specific constructs or domains within HSR is particularly important in the context of low and middle-income countries (L&MICs) to facilitate targeted improvement. Following a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we developed a conceptual framework for HSR. This study was designed to validate our proposed framework through a Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Global HSR experts were contacted via email to participate in the study, and a copy of the proposed framework (12 domains, 53 subdomains) was shared with them. Participants were asked to rate each subdomain on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest score; based on scientific strength, relevance and feasibility. They also provided suggestions to merge, omit or add domains and subdomains. A subdomain was retained if it received a rating of 4 or 5 from at least 70% of participants for scientific strength and relevance, and 50% or more for feasibility. The final version of the framework was shared with all participants for approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen global health experts participated in the Delphi process. Final version of the HSR framework consisted of 10 domains: respect for dignity, autonomy and confidentiality of information; quality of basic amenities; access to social support networks during care; choice of provider; prompt access to care; attention, clarity of communication and guidance; consideration of financial protection; coordination and continuity of care and 31 subdomains. The overall Cronbach's alpha values were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.96 for the categories of scientific strength, relevance and feasibility of assessment, respectively, indicating very high internal consistency among the Delphi participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend using this framework to elaborate on HSR across L&MICs, after pretesting within specific contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope.\",\"authors\":\"Meesha Iqbal, Robert Morgan, Cici Bauer, Cecilia Ganduglia Cazaban, Sameen Siddiqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health systems responsiveness (HSR) addresses the legitimate non-health expectations of the population and plays a vital role in strengthening health systems and enhancing population health. Identifying specific constructs or domains within HSR is particularly important in the context of low and middle-income countries (L&MICs) to facilitate targeted improvement. Following a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we developed a conceptual framework for HSR. This study was designed to validate our proposed framework through a Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Global HSR experts were contacted via email to participate in the study, and a copy of the proposed framework (12 domains, 53 subdomains) was shared with them. Participants were asked to rate each subdomain on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest score; based on scientific strength, relevance and feasibility. They also provided suggestions to merge, omit or add domains and subdomains. A subdomain was retained if it received a rating of 4 or 5 from at least 70% of participants for scientific strength and relevance, and 50% or more for feasibility. The final version of the framework was shared with all participants for approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen global health experts participated in the Delphi process. Final version of the HSR framework consisted of 10 domains: respect for dignity, autonomy and confidentiality of information; quality of basic amenities; access to social support networks during care; choice of provider; prompt access to care; attention, clarity of communication and guidance; consideration of financial protection; coordination and continuity of care and 31 subdomains. The overall Cronbach's alpha values were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.96 for the categories of scientific strength, relevance and feasibility of assessment, respectively, indicating very high internal consistency among the Delphi participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend using this framework to elaborate on HSR across L&MICs, after pretesting within specific contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:卫生系统反应性(HSR)处理人口的合理非卫生期望,并在加强卫生系统和增进人口健康方面发挥至关重要的作用。在低收入和中等收入国家(L&MICs)的背景下,确定高铁中的特定结构或领域对于促进有针对性的改进尤为重要。在对文献进行全面系统的回顾之后,我们为高铁开发了一个概念框架。本研究旨在通过德尔菲过程验证我们提出的框架。方法:通过电子邮件联系全球高铁专家参与研究,并与他们共享拟议框架的副本(12个域,53个子域)。参与者被要求对每个子域进行1-5分的评分,5分是最高分;基于科学性、相关性和可行性。他们还提供了合并、省略或添加域和子域的建议。如果一个子域在科学强度和相关性方面从至少70%的参与者那里获得4或5分,并且在可行性方面获得50%或更多的评分,则该子域将被保留。框架的最终版本与所有参与者共享以获得批准。结果:13位全球卫生专家参与了德尔菲过程。高铁框架的最终版本包括10个领域:尊重尊严、自主和信息保密;基本生活设施的质素;在护理期间利用社会支持网络;供应商的选择;迅速获得护理;关注、清晰的沟通和指导;财政保障的考虑;护理和31个子领域的协调和连续性。评估的科学强度、相关性和可行性类别的总体Cronbach's alpha值分别为0.94、0.93和0.96,表明德尔菲参与者之间的内部一致性很高。结论:我们建议在特定背景下进行预测试后,使用该框架来详细阐述跨低收入和中等收入国家的高铁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health systems responsiveness in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs): revisiting its scope.

Introduction: Health systems responsiveness (HSR) addresses the legitimate non-health expectations of the population and plays a vital role in strengthening health systems and enhancing population health. Identifying specific constructs or domains within HSR is particularly important in the context of low and middle-income countries (L&MICs) to facilitate targeted improvement. Following a comprehensive systematic review of the literature, we developed a conceptual framework for HSR. This study was designed to validate our proposed framework through a Delphi process.

Methods: Global HSR experts were contacted via email to participate in the study, and a copy of the proposed framework (12 domains, 53 subdomains) was shared with them. Participants were asked to rate each subdomain on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the highest score; based on scientific strength, relevance and feasibility. They also provided suggestions to merge, omit or add domains and subdomains. A subdomain was retained if it received a rating of 4 or 5 from at least 70% of participants for scientific strength and relevance, and 50% or more for feasibility. The final version of the framework was shared with all participants for approval.

Results: Thirteen global health experts participated in the Delphi process. Final version of the HSR framework consisted of 10 domains: respect for dignity, autonomy and confidentiality of information; quality of basic amenities; access to social support networks during care; choice of provider; prompt access to care; attention, clarity of communication and guidance; consideration of financial protection; coordination and continuity of care and 31 subdomains. The overall Cronbach's alpha values were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.96 for the categories of scientific strength, relevance and feasibility of assessment, respectively, indicating very high internal consistency among the Delphi participants.

Conclusion: We recommend using this framework to elaborate on HSR across L&MICs, after pretesting within specific contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信