在官僚治理的阴影下:政府组织内部治理的框架

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Rick Anderson
{"title":"在官僚治理的阴影下:政府组织内部治理的框架","authors":"Rick Anderson","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Government organisations employ various forms of governance, both externally and internally. Externally, government organisations increasingly operate within networks, while internally, bureaucratic governance is often maintained. While research has been conducted on how external network governance can be shaped, less is known about the impact of internal governance on the contribution the government organisation makes to the external network and how the internal governance structure within a government organisation can align with its external network governance. This research demonstrates that the way internal governance is structured influences the contribution that government organisations make to an external network. Internally, a bureaucratic form of governance is often combined with network or market governance. Combining bureaucratic governance with network governance provides a good basis for timely and substantively correct contributions but can also lead to a clash between these two forms of governance. The combination of bureaucratic governance and market governance provides a basis not only for timely and substantively correct contribution but also for reliable contribution to the network.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>It can be concluded that bureaucratic governance can be effective insofar as it targets the organisational units under the primary director's responsibility. However, this internal governance form can fall short when contributions from other directorates need to be adjusted.</li>\n \n <li>This is especially evident in external projects realised within a network that involve contributions from multiple departments under different directors within the government organisation, as an organisation relying solely on bureaucratic governance may struggle to provide timely and appropriate support for the project.</li>\n \n <li>A combination of bureaucratic governance and network governance appears to be more effective, but a lack of coordination between the two can lead to internal governance conflicts. This can result in inconsistent contributions to the project by the government organisation.</li>\n \n <li>When internally combining bureaucratic governance with market governance, this issue seems to be less prevalent. The study demonstrates that a blend of bureaucratic and market governance leads to perceived reliability of the organisation's contribution by project participants.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"84 3","pages":"499-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the shadow of bureaucratic governance: A framework for internal governance in government organisations\",\"authors\":\"Rick Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Government organisations employ various forms of governance, both externally and internally. Externally, government organisations increasingly operate within networks, while internally, bureaucratic governance is often maintained. While research has been conducted on how external network governance can be shaped, less is known about the impact of internal governance on the contribution the government organisation makes to the external network and how the internal governance structure within a government organisation can align with its external network governance. This research demonstrates that the way internal governance is structured influences the contribution that government organisations make to an external network. Internally, a bureaucratic form of governance is often combined with network or market governance. Combining bureaucratic governance with network governance provides a good basis for timely and substantively correct contributions but can also lead to a clash between these two forms of governance. The combination of bureaucratic governance and market governance provides a basis not only for timely and substantively correct contribution but also for reliable contribution to the network.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>It can be concluded that bureaucratic governance can be effective insofar as it targets the organisational units under the primary director's responsibility. However, this internal governance form can fall short when contributions from other directorates need to be adjusted.</li>\\n \\n <li>This is especially evident in external projects realised within a network that involve contributions from multiple departments under different directors within the government organisation, as an organisation relying solely on bureaucratic governance may struggle to provide timely and appropriate support for the project.</li>\\n \\n <li>A combination of bureaucratic governance and network governance appears to be more effective, but a lack of coordination between the two can lead to internal governance conflicts. This can result in inconsistent contributions to the project by the government organisation.</li>\\n \\n <li>When internally combining bureaucratic governance with market governance, this issue seems to be less prevalent. The study demonstrates that a blend of bureaucratic and market governance leads to perceived reliability of the organisation's contribution by project participants.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"499-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府机构采用各种形式的治理,包括外部治理和内部治理。在外部,政府组织越来越多地在网络中运作,而在内部,官僚主义治理往往得到维持。虽然外部网络治理如何形成已经有了研究,但对于内部治理对政府组织对外部网络的贡献的影响以及政府组织内部治理结构如何与外部网络治理保持一致的研究却很少。本研究表明,内部治理的结构方式影响政府组织对外部网络的贡献。在内部,官僚形式的治理往往与网络或市场治理相结合。将官僚治理与网络治理相结合,为及时和实质上正确的贡献提供了良好的基础,但也可能导致这两种治理形式之间的冲突。官僚治理与市场治理的结合,不仅为及时、实质正确的贡献提供了基础,也为可靠的网络贡献提供了基础。从业者要点可以得出结论,官僚治理可以有效,因为它针对的是主要董事责任下的组织单位。然而,当需要调整其他董事会的贡献时,这种内部治理形式可能会有所不足。这在涉及政府机构内不同主管下的多个部门的网络内实现的外部项目中尤为明显,因为仅仅依靠官僚治理的组织可能难以为项目提供及时和适当的支持。官僚治理与网络治理相结合似乎更有效,但两者之间缺乏协调可能导致内部治理冲突。这可能导致政府机构对项目的贡献不一致。在内部将官僚治理与市场治理结合起来,这个问题似乎就不那么普遍了。该研究表明,官僚和市场治理的混合导致项目参与者对组织贡献的感知可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the shadow of bureaucratic governance: A framework for internal governance in government organisations

Government organisations employ various forms of governance, both externally and internally. Externally, government organisations increasingly operate within networks, while internally, bureaucratic governance is often maintained. While research has been conducted on how external network governance can be shaped, less is known about the impact of internal governance on the contribution the government organisation makes to the external network and how the internal governance structure within a government organisation can align with its external network governance. This research demonstrates that the way internal governance is structured influences the contribution that government organisations make to an external network. Internally, a bureaucratic form of governance is often combined with network or market governance. Combining bureaucratic governance with network governance provides a good basis for timely and substantively correct contributions but can also lead to a clash between these two forms of governance. The combination of bureaucratic governance and market governance provides a basis not only for timely and substantively correct contribution but also for reliable contribution to the network.

Points for practitioners

  • It can be concluded that bureaucratic governance can be effective insofar as it targets the organisational units under the primary director's responsibility. However, this internal governance form can fall short when contributions from other directorates need to be adjusted.
  • This is especially evident in external projects realised within a network that involve contributions from multiple departments under different directors within the government organisation, as an organisation relying solely on bureaucratic governance may struggle to provide timely and appropriate support for the project.
  • A combination of bureaucratic governance and network governance appears to be more effective, but a lack of coordination between the two can lead to internal governance conflicts. This can result in inconsistent contributions to the project by the government organisation.
  • When internally combining bureaucratic governance with market governance, this issue seems to be less prevalent. The study demonstrates that a blend of bureaucratic and market governance leads to perceived reliability of the organisation's contribution by project participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信