了解消费者对无酒精葡萄酒的接受程度和障碍:对质量感知和购买动机的洞察

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yogesh Kumar, Arianna Ricci, Giuseppina Paola Parpinello, Andrea Versari
{"title":"了解消费者对无酒精葡萄酒的接受程度和障碍:对质量感知和购买动机的洞察","authors":"Yogesh Kumar,&nbsp;Arianna Ricci,&nbsp;Giuseppina Paola Parpinello,&nbsp;Andrea Versari","doi":"10.1111/joss.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global demand for nonalcoholic wine is growing significantly, driven by evolving consumer preferences, health-conscious trends, and religious considerations. This study evaluates consumers' ability to differentiate wine samples based on alcohol content (12%, 6%, and 0% v/v), perceptions of overall quality, and the motivations and barriers influencing the choice of alcohol-free wine across demographics (age, gender, and education). For this, a sensory evaluation was conducted using a ranking task, where consumers were randomly presented with the three wine samples and asked to rank them from highest to lowest alcohol content. Subsequently, participants rated the overall quality and reported the motivations and barriers influencing their choice of alcohol-free wine. A total of 59 participants (57.6% female and 42.4% male) took part in consumer acceptance testing and surveys. Sensory analysis revealed that 88.14% of participants correctly identified the original wine (OW), while 76.27% identified the partially dealcoholized wine (PDW) and the alcohol-free wine (DW). Overall quality scores significantly declined with decreasing alcohol content, with DW receiving the lowest score (4.2 ± 2.5), suggesting that ethanol concentration may influence flavor perception and overall sensory preference in the evaluated wines. Safety (52.5%), health or wellness benefits (44.1%), and the desire to avoid alcohol (37.3%) emerged as the primary motivations for consuming alcohol-free wine. In contrast, sensory shortcomings (64.4%), higher costs (25.4%), and limited availability (23.7%) were identified as key barriers to the adoption of alcohol-free wine. Furthermore, educational qualification (PhD &gt; BSc &gt; MSc) and age groups (younger: 18–35 years &gt; older: above 35 years) significantly influenced the motivational factors “for social occasions without alcohol” (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 8.20, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and “health or wellness benefits” (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 9.74, <i>p</i> = 0.04), respectively. However, no statistically significant associations were found between demographic variables and key barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Consumer Acceptance and Barriers to Alcohol-Free Wine: Insights Into Quality Perception and Purchase Motivations Across Demographics\",\"authors\":\"Yogesh Kumar,&nbsp;Arianna Ricci,&nbsp;Giuseppina Paola Parpinello,&nbsp;Andrea Versari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joss.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The global demand for nonalcoholic wine is growing significantly, driven by evolving consumer preferences, health-conscious trends, and religious considerations. This study evaluates consumers' ability to differentiate wine samples based on alcohol content (12%, 6%, and 0% v/v), perceptions of overall quality, and the motivations and barriers influencing the choice of alcohol-free wine across demographics (age, gender, and education). For this, a sensory evaluation was conducted using a ranking task, where consumers were randomly presented with the three wine samples and asked to rank them from highest to lowest alcohol content. Subsequently, participants rated the overall quality and reported the motivations and barriers influencing their choice of alcohol-free wine. A total of 59 participants (57.6% female and 42.4% male) took part in consumer acceptance testing and surveys. Sensory analysis revealed that 88.14% of participants correctly identified the original wine (OW), while 76.27% identified the partially dealcoholized wine (PDW) and the alcohol-free wine (DW). Overall quality scores significantly declined with decreasing alcohol content, with DW receiving the lowest score (4.2 ± 2.5), suggesting that ethanol concentration may influence flavor perception and overall sensory preference in the evaluated wines. Safety (52.5%), health or wellness benefits (44.1%), and the desire to avoid alcohol (37.3%) emerged as the primary motivations for consuming alcohol-free wine. In contrast, sensory shortcomings (64.4%), higher costs (25.4%), and limited availability (23.7%) were identified as key barriers to the adoption of alcohol-free wine. Furthermore, educational qualification (PhD &gt; BSc &gt; MSc) and age groups (younger: 18–35 years &gt; older: above 35 years) significantly influenced the motivational factors “for social occasions without alcohol” (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 8.20, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and “health or wellness benefits” (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 9.74, <i>p</i> = 0.04), respectively. However, no statistically significant associations were found between demographic variables and key barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70074\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受不断变化的消费者偏好、健康意识趋势和宗教考虑的推动,全球对无酒精葡萄酒的需求正在显著增长。本研究评估了消费者根据酒精含量(12%、6%和0% v/v)、对整体质量的看法、以及影响无酒精葡萄酒选择的动机和障碍(年龄、性别和教育程度)区分葡萄酒样品的能力。为此,通过排序任务进行感官评估,消费者随机获得三种葡萄酒样品,并要求他们从最高到最低的酒精含量进行排名。随后,参与者对整体质量进行了评级,并报告了影响他们选择无酒精葡萄酒的动机和障碍。共有59名参与者(57.6%为女性,42.4%为男性)参加了消费者接受度测试和调查。感官分析显示,88.14%的参与者正确识别了原始葡萄酒(OW),而76.27%的参与者正确识别了部分脱醇葡萄酒(PDW)和无醇葡萄酒(DW)。随着酒精含量的降低,整体质量得分显著下降,DW得分最低(4.2±2.5),这表明乙醇浓度可能会影响被评价葡萄酒的风味感知和整体感官偏好。安全(52.5%)、健康或保健益处(44.1%)和避免饮酒(37.3%)是消费无酒精葡萄酒的主要动机。相比之下,感官缺陷(64.4%)、成本较高(25.4%)和供应有限(23.7%)被认为是采用无酒精葡萄酒的主要障碍。此外,学历(博士>;理学学士>;理学硕士)和年龄组(年龄较小:18-35岁;年龄较大:35岁以上)分别显著影响“不喝酒的社交场合”(χ2 = 8.20, p = 0.02)和“健康或保健利益”(χ2 = 9.74, p = 0.04)的动机因素。然而,在人口统计变量和主要障碍之间没有发现统计学上显著的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding Consumer Acceptance and Barriers to Alcohol-Free Wine: Insights Into Quality Perception and Purchase Motivations Across Demographics

Understanding Consumer Acceptance and Barriers to Alcohol-Free Wine: Insights Into Quality Perception and Purchase Motivations Across Demographics

The global demand for nonalcoholic wine is growing significantly, driven by evolving consumer preferences, health-conscious trends, and religious considerations. This study evaluates consumers' ability to differentiate wine samples based on alcohol content (12%, 6%, and 0% v/v), perceptions of overall quality, and the motivations and barriers influencing the choice of alcohol-free wine across demographics (age, gender, and education). For this, a sensory evaluation was conducted using a ranking task, where consumers were randomly presented with the three wine samples and asked to rank them from highest to lowest alcohol content. Subsequently, participants rated the overall quality and reported the motivations and barriers influencing their choice of alcohol-free wine. A total of 59 participants (57.6% female and 42.4% male) took part in consumer acceptance testing and surveys. Sensory analysis revealed that 88.14% of participants correctly identified the original wine (OW), while 76.27% identified the partially dealcoholized wine (PDW) and the alcohol-free wine (DW). Overall quality scores significantly declined with decreasing alcohol content, with DW receiving the lowest score (4.2 ± 2.5), suggesting that ethanol concentration may influence flavor perception and overall sensory preference in the evaluated wines. Safety (52.5%), health or wellness benefits (44.1%), and the desire to avoid alcohol (37.3%) emerged as the primary motivations for consuming alcohol-free wine. In contrast, sensory shortcomings (64.4%), higher costs (25.4%), and limited availability (23.7%) were identified as key barriers to the adoption of alcohol-free wine. Furthermore, educational qualification (PhD > BSc > MSc) and age groups (younger: 18–35 years > older: above 35 years) significantly influenced the motivational factors “for social occasions without alcohol” (χ2 = 8.20, p = 0.02) and “health or wellness benefits” (χ2 = 9.74, p = 0.04), respectively. However, no statistically significant associations were found between demographic variables and key barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信