战略国家的概念:30年后的评估

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Ian C. Elliott, Alasdair Roberts
{"title":"战略国家的概念:30年后的评估","authors":"Ian C. Elliott,&nbsp;Alasdair Roberts","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The strategic state was conceptualised 30 years ago in response to neoliberal reforms of government and the rise of New Public Management that began in Western democracies in the 1980s. The concept was widely used by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in assessing the performance of governments through the 2000s. This research note describes how the concept has evolved, lessons learned from the application of the concept over the last 20 years, and some new developments that affirm the continuing relevance of the concept but also make its practical application more challenging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The strategic state is a well-established concept of long-term, outcomes-based government. It is pertinent to contemporary debates around mission-driven government and wellbeing approaches to government.</li>\n \n <li>The strategic state requires long-term and sustained investment in strategic capabilities, in part to mitigate against electoral pressures.</li>\n \n <li>Secondly, it requires a connection from strategy to action through clear accountability processes for both individuals and organisations including appropriate budgeting and evaluation mechanisms.</li>\n \n <li>Thirdly, a successful strategic state requires effective collaboration between different levels of government. This can be supported through a relational approach to public service design and delivery.</li>\n \n <li>Challenges to the strategic state include increased turbulence from political events, economic crises, the climate emergency, and the rise of artificial intelligence; the erosion of public trust in government and social cohesion combined with the rise of populist movements; and a decay in the media environment with increasing public alienation and polarisation in political debate.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"84 3","pages":"558-569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12685","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The concept of the strategic state: An assessment after 30 years\",\"authors\":\"Ian C. Elliott,&nbsp;Alasdair Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.12685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>The strategic state was conceptualised 30 years ago in response to neoliberal reforms of government and the rise of New Public Management that began in Western democracies in the 1980s. The concept was widely used by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in assessing the performance of governments through the 2000s. This research note describes how the concept has evolved, lessons learned from the application of the concept over the last 20 years, and some new developments that affirm the continuing relevance of the concept but also make its practical application more challenging.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The strategic state is a well-established concept of long-term, outcomes-based government. It is pertinent to contemporary debates around mission-driven government and wellbeing approaches to government.</li>\\n \\n <li>The strategic state requires long-term and sustained investment in strategic capabilities, in part to mitigate against electoral pressures.</li>\\n \\n <li>Secondly, it requires a connection from strategy to action through clear accountability processes for both individuals and organisations including appropriate budgeting and evaluation mechanisms.</li>\\n \\n <li>Thirdly, a successful strategic state requires effective collaboration between different levels of government. This can be supported through a relational approach to public service design and delivery.</li>\\n \\n <li>Challenges to the strategic state include increased turbulence from political events, economic crises, the climate emergency, and the rise of artificial intelligence; the erosion of public trust in government and social cohesion combined with the rise of populist movements; and a decay in the media environment with increasing public alienation and polarisation in political debate.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"558-569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12685\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12685\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略国家的概念是30年前提出的,是对20世纪80年代西方民主国家开始的新自由主义政府改革和新公共管理兴起的回应。经济合作与发展组织(oecd)在本世纪头十年广泛使用这一概念来评估各国政府的表现。这份研究报告描述了这个概念是如何演变的,在过去20年里从这个概念的应用中吸取的教训,以及一些新的发展,这些发展肯定了这个概念的持续相关性,但也使它的实际应用更具挑战性。战略国家是一个长期的、基于结果的政府概念。它与当代围绕使命驱动型政府和政府福利方法的辩论有关。战略国家需要对战略能力进行长期和持续的投资,部分原因是为了减轻选举压力。其次,它需要通过个人和组织的明确问责程序,包括适当的预算和评估机制,将战略与行动联系起来。第三,一个成功的战略国家需要各级政府之间的有效合作。这可以通过公共服务设计和交付的关系方法得到支持。战略国家面临的挑战包括政治事件、经济危机、气候紧急情况和人工智能的崛起带来的动荡加剧;公众对政府和社会凝聚力的信任受到侵蚀,加上民粹主义运动的兴起;以及媒体环境的衰退,公众日益疏远,政治辩论两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The concept of the strategic state: An assessment after 30 years

The strategic state was conceptualised 30 years ago in response to neoliberal reforms of government and the rise of New Public Management that began in Western democracies in the 1980s. The concept was widely used by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in assessing the performance of governments through the 2000s. This research note describes how the concept has evolved, lessons learned from the application of the concept over the last 20 years, and some new developments that affirm the continuing relevance of the concept but also make its practical application more challenging.

Points for practitioners

  • The strategic state is a well-established concept of long-term, outcomes-based government. It is pertinent to contemporary debates around mission-driven government and wellbeing approaches to government.
  • The strategic state requires long-term and sustained investment in strategic capabilities, in part to mitigate against electoral pressures.
  • Secondly, it requires a connection from strategy to action through clear accountability processes for both individuals and organisations including appropriate budgeting and evaluation mechanisms.
  • Thirdly, a successful strategic state requires effective collaboration between different levels of government. This can be supported through a relational approach to public service design and delivery.
  • Challenges to the strategic state include increased turbulence from political events, economic crises, the climate emergency, and the rise of artificial intelligence; the erosion of public trust in government and social cohesion combined with the rise of populist movements; and a decay in the media environment with increasing public alienation and polarisation in political debate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信