石油和天然气生产区区域监测检测到的乙烷浓度升高的来源归属

Joel D. Graves, Yosuke Kimura, Mrinali Modi, Shannon Stokes, Morgan Meyer, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz and David T. Allen*, 
{"title":"石油和天然气生产区区域监测检测到的乙烷浓度升高的来源归属","authors":"Joel D. Graves,&nbsp;Yosuke Kimura,&nbsp;Mrinali Modi,&nbsp;Shannon Stokes,&nbsp;Morgan Meyer,&nbsp;Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz and David T. Allen*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.5c00235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Measurements of ambient ethane concentrations at a regional air quality monitor in the Eagle Ford oil and gas production region are compared to concentrations predicted using site-level hydrocarbon emission inventories coupled with a Gaussian puff dispersion model (CALPUFF). To account for more than half of mean concentrations due to routine emissions, sites at distances 20–50 km from the receptor site were included in the simulations. Nearly all of the highest observed concentrations were observed at night. For each night in the simulation, the location and magnitude of the maximum predicted concentration and maximum observed concentration were compared, and approximately two-thirds of the highest observed nighttime maximum concentrations were accounted for by routine emissions. In contrast, approximately a third of the highest daytime maxima could be accounted for by routine emissions. Most of the large observed maxima that are attributable to routine emissions are predicted to be caused by sources that were within 10 km of the receptor site, but sources up to 20 or more kilometers from the receptor also contributed to the predicted concentrations. A case study is provided demonstrating the potential of coupling site-level inventories of routine emissions with dispersion modeling for attributing sources of elevated hydrocarbon concentrations.</p><p >The largest hydrocarbon enhancements observed at regional monitors are due to both routine emissions and emission events from nearby and distant sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 9","pages":"2038–2046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsestair.5c00235","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source Attribution of Elevated Ethane Concentrations Detected by Regional Monitors in Oil and Gas Production Regions\",\"authors\":\"Joel D. Graves,&nbsp;Yosuke Kimura,&nbsp;Mrinali Modi,&nbsp;Shannon Stokes,&nbsp;Morgan Meyer,&nbsp;Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz and David T. Allen*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.5c00235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Measurements of ambient ethane concentrations at a regional air quality monitor in the Eagle Ford oil and gas production region are compared to concentrations predicted using site-level hydrocarbon emission inventories coupled with a Gaussian puff dispersion model (CALPUFF). To account for more than half of mean concentrations due to routine emissions, sites at distances 20–50 km from the receptor site were included in the simulations. Nearly all of the highest observed concentrations were observed at night. For each night in the simulation, the location and magnitude of the maximum predicted concentration and maximum observed concentration were compared, and approximately two-thirds of the highest observed nighttime maximum concentrations were accounted for by routine emissions. In contrast, approximately a third of the highest daytime maxima could be accounted for by routine emissions. Most of the large observed maxima that are attributable to routine emissions are predicted to be caused by sources that were within 10 km of the receptor site, but sources up to 20 or more kilometers from the receptor also contributed to the predicted concentrations. A case study is provided demonstrating the potential of coupling site-level inventories of routine emissions with dispersion modeling for attributing sources of elevated hydrocarbon concentrations.</p><p >The largest hydrocarbon enhancements observed at regional monitors are due to both routine emissions and emission events from nearby and distant sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"2038–2046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsestair.5c00235\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将Eagle Ford油气产区区域空气质量监测仪测量的环境乙烷浓度与现场水平碳氢化合物排放清单和高斯喷散模型(CALPUFF)预测的浓度进行比较。为了计算常规排放造成的平均浓度的一半以上,模拟中包括了距离受体位置20-50公里的地点。几乎所有观测到的最高浓度都发生在夜间。对于模拟中的每个夜晚,最大预测浓度和最大观测浓度的位置和大小进行了比较,并且大约三分之二的最高观测夜间最大浓度是由常规排放造成的。相比之下,大约三分之一的日间最高峰值可以由日常排放造成。大多数观测到的可归因于常规排放的较大最大值预计是由距离受体位置10公里以内的源造成的,但距离受体20公里或更远的源也对预测的浓度有贡献。提供了一个案例研究,展示了将常规排放的现场水平清单与分散模型相结合的潜力,以确定碳氢化合物浓度升高的来源。在区域监测中观察到的最大的碳氢化合物增加是由于常规排放和来自近源和远源的排放事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Source Attribution of Elevated Ethane Concentrations Detected by Regional Monitors in Oil and Gas Production Regions

Measurements of ambient ethane concentrations at a regional air quality monitor in the Eagle Ford oil and gas production region are compared to concentrations predicted using site-level hydrocarbon emission inventories coupled with a Gaussian puff dispersion model (CALPUFF). To account for more than half of mean concentrations due to routine emissions, sites at distances 20–50 km from the receptor site were included in the simulations. Nearly all of the highest observed concentrations were observed at night. For each night in the simulation, the location and magnitude of the maximum predicted concentration and maximum observed concentration were compared, and approximately two-thirds of the highest observed nighttime maximum concentrations were accounted for by routine emissions. In contrast, approximately a third of the highest daytime maxima could be accounted for by routine emissions. Most of the large observed maxima that are attributable to routine emissions are predicted to be caused by sources that were within 10 km of the receptor site, but sources up to 20 or more kilometers from the receptor also contributed to the predicted concentrations. A case study is provided demonstrating the potential of coupling site-level inventories of routine emissions with dispersion modeling for attributing sources of elevated hydrocarbon concentrations.

The largest hydrocarbon enhancements observed at regional monitors are due to both routine emissions and emission events from nearby and distant sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信