Md Rasheduzzaman, Breanna Lytton, Emily Wilcox, Arpita Das, Margaret Wirth, Alvaro Hurtado, Leigh-Anne Krometis and Alasdair Cohen*,
{"title":"一次性和多包装瓶装水中的微生物和化学污染物:美国26个瓶装水品牌的内部和内部分析","authors":"Md Rasheduzzaman, Breanna Lytton, Emily Wilcox, Arpita Das, Margaret Wirth, Alvaro Hurtado, Leigh-Anne Krometis and Alasdair Cohen*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Relatively few published studies have assessed the microbiological or chemical quality of bottled water in the USA. We purchased all single and multipackage bottled water sold in grocery and retail stores in one county in Virginia. 107 samples, across 26 brands, were tested for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total coliform, <i>E. coli</i>, nitrate, sulfate, free chlorine, total trihalomethanes (THMs, a component of disinfection byproducts), fluoride, and heavy metals. 64.5% (<i>n</i> = 69) of samples were purified water and 35.5% (<i>n</i> = 38) were spring water. Contaminant concentrations were higher overall in spring water samples. Total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> were not detected in any samples. 1.4% (<i>n</i> = 1) of purified bottled water samples exceeded regulatory standards for THM (80 ppb), and 7.2% (<i>n</i> = 5) and 10.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of purified and spring samples exceeded 1/2 the THM standard, respectively. No spring water samples exceeded standards for heavy metals, but one purified bottled water sample exceeded the standard for cadmium. We observed considerable within-brand variability in concentrations for a number of parameters including THMs, calcium, silicon, and strontium. This is the first study we are aware of to analyze contaminant variability within bottled water brands. Our results indicate that monitoring and reporting requirements for bottled water should be improved.</p><p >Almost all tested bottled water samples complied with regulatory standards; however, a few did not, and we observed considerable within-brand variability for some parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 9","pages":"5471–5481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Single-Use and Multipackage Bottled Water: Inter- and Intra-analyses of 26 Bottled Water Brands in the USA\",\"authors\":\"Md Rasheduzzaman, Breanna Lytton, Emily Wilcox, Arpita Das, Margaret Wirth, Alvaro Hurtado, Leigh-Anne Krometis and Alasdair Cohen*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Relatively few published studies have assessed the microbiological or chemical quality of bottled water in the USA. We purchased all single and multipackage bottled water sold in grocery and retail stores in one county in Virginia. 107 samples, across 26 brands, were tested for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total coliform, <i>E. coli</i>, nitrate, sulfate, free chlorine, total trihalomethanes (THMs, a component of disinfection byproducts), fluoride, and heavy metals. 64.5% (<i>n</i> = 69) of samples were purified water and 35.5% (<i>n</i> = 38) were spring water. Contaminant concentrations were higher overall in spring water samples. Total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> were not detected in any samples. 1.4% (<i>n</i> = 1) of purified bottled water samples exceeded regulatory standards for THM (80 ppb), and 7.2% (<i>n</i> = 5) and 10.5% (<i>n</i> = 4) of purified and spring samples exceeded 1/2 the THM standard, respectively. No spring water samples exceeded standards for heavy metals, but one purified bottled water sample exceeded the standard for cadmium. We observed considerable within-brand variability in concentrations for a number of parameters including THMs, calcium, silicon, and strontium. This is the first study we are aware of to analyze contaminant variability within bottled water brands. Our results indicate that monitoring and reporting requirements for bottled water should be improved.</p><p >Almost all tested bottled water samples complied with regulatory standards; however, a few did not, and we observed considerable within-brand variability for some parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"5471–5481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Single-Use and Multipackage Bottled Water: Inter- and Intra-analyses of 26 Bottled Water Brands in the USA
Relatively few published studies have assessed the microbiological or chemical quality of bottled water in the USA. We purchased all single and multipackage bottled water sold in grocery and retail stores in one county in Virginia. 107 samples, across 26 brands, were tested for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total coliform, E. coli, nitrate, sulfate, free chlorine, total trihalomethanes (THMs, a component of disinfection byproducts), fluoride, and heavy metals. 64.5% (n = 69) of samples were purified water and 35.5% (n = 38) were spring water. Contaminant concentrations were higher overall in spring water samples. Total coliforms and E. coli were not detected in any samples. 1.4% (n = 1) of purified bottled water samples exceeded regulatory standards for THM (80 ppb), and 7.2% (n = 5) and 10.5% (n = 4) of purified and spring samples exceeded 1/2 the THM standard, respectively. No spring water samples exceeded standards for heavy metals, but one purified bottled water sample exceeded the standard for cadmium. We observed considerable within-brand variability in concentrations for a number of parameters including THMs, calcium, silicon, and strontium. This is the first study we are aware of to analyze contaminant variability within bottled water brands. Our results indicate that monitoring and reporting requirements for bottled water should be improved.
Almost all tested bottled water samples complied with regulatory standards; however, a few did not, and we observed considerable within-brand variability for some parameters.