低成本PurpleAir PM2.5传感器在南亚条件下的性能评估和校准:达卡,孟加拉国

Chowdhury A. Hossain, Sanjeev Delwar, Dipika R. Prapti, Md. Aynul Bari, Julian D. Marshall and Provat K. Saha*, 
{"title":"低成本PurpleAir PM2.5传感器在南亚条件下的性能评估和校准:达卡,孟加拉国","authors":"Chowdhury A. Hossain,&nbsp;Sanjeev Delwar,&nbsp;Dipika R. Prapti,&nbsp;Md. Aynul Bari,&nbsp;Julian D. Marshall and Provat K. Saha*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.5c00105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we assessed the performance of PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensors and developed calibration models in Dhaka, Bangladesh─one of the global hotspots most severely affected by extreme air pollution. We collocated an array of PurpleAir (PA-II-SD) sensors alongside a beta attenuation monitor (BAM: MetOne BAM-1020) across the dry and wet seasons. Specifically, we collocated 10 sensors during the wet season and 20 sensors during the dry season, collecting one month of colocation data per season, covering a wide range of pollution levels and meteorological conditions. Quality-assured hourly concentrations from different PurpleAir units have shown good consistency, with pairwise <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values generally exceeding 0.95. We developed empirical correction models by testing 29 multiple linear regression (MLR) forms and Random Forest models. Results showed that for hourly average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured by PurpleAir, a simple linear correction model achieved an accuracy (nRMSE) within 17–18% of hourly BAM measurements. More complex MLR models incorporating several meteorological variables and interaction terms improved accuracy (nRMSE) slightly, to ∼15%. Random Forest models slightly outperformed all MLR models, at 12–14% (nRMSE) accuracy relative to BAM. Our findings highlight that existing correction models─particularly those developed for U.S. cities and used in the PurpleAir map─are inadequate for Bangladeshi conditions. Uncorrected PurpleAir cf_atm PM<sub>2.5</sub> data yielded accuracy within 25% of BAM measurements. Further research is needed to assess sensor performance in rural and suburban environments and to evaluate long-term performance under diverse climatological and source conditions in Bangladesh and South Asia.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 9","pages":"1904–1915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost PurpleAir PM2.5 Sensors in South Asian Conditions: Dhaka, Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Chowdhury A. Hossain,&nbsp;Sanjeev Delwar,&nbsp;Dipika R. Prapti,&nbsp;Md. Aynul Bari,&nbsp;Julian D. Marshall and Provat K. Saha*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.5c00105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In this study, we assessed the performance of PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensors and developed calibration models in Dhaka, Bangladesh─one of the global hotspots most severely affected by extreme air pollution. We collocated an array of PurpleAir (PA-II-SD) sensors alongside a beta attenuation monitor (BAM: MetOne BAM-1020) across the dry and wet seasons. Specifically, we collocated 10 sensors during the wet season and 20 sensors during the dry season, collecting one month of colocation data per season, covering a wide range of pollution levels and meteorological conditions. Quality-assured hourly concentrations from different PurpleAir units have shown good consistency, with pairwise <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values generally exceeding 0.95. We developed empirical correction models by testing 29 multiple linear regression (MLR) forms and Random Forest models. Results showed that for hourly average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations measured by PurpleAir, a simple linear correction model achieved an accuracy (nRMSE) within 17–18% of hourly BAM measurements. More complex MLR models incorporating several meteorological variables and interaction terms improved accuracy (nRMSE) slightly, to ∼15%. Random Forest models slightly outperformed all MLR models, at 12–14% (nRMSE) accuracy relative to BAM. Our findings highlight that existing correction models─particularly those developed for U.S. cities and used in the PurpleAir map─are inadequate for Bangladeshi conditions. Uncorrected PurpleAir cf_atm PM<sub>2.5</sub> data yielded accuracy within 25% of BAM measurements. Further research is needed to assess sensor performance in rural and suburban environments and to evaluate long-term performance under diverse climatological and source conditions in Bangladesh and South Asia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"1904–1915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了PurpleAir PM2.5传感器的性能,并在全球受极端空气污染影响最严重的热点城市之一孟加拉国达卡开发了校准模型。我们在干湿季节配置了一系列PurpleAir (PA-II-SD)传感器以及beta衰减监视器(BAM: MetOne BAM-1020)。具体来说,我们在雨季和旱季分别安装了10个传感器和20个传感器,每个季节收集一个月的数据,涵盖了广泛的污染水平和气象条件。不同PurpleAir单位的质量保证小时浓度显示出良好的一致性,两两R2值通常超过0.95。我们通过检验29种多元线性回归(MLR)形式和随机森林模型建立了经验修正模型。结果表明,对于PurpleAir测量的每小时平均PM2.5浓度,一个简单的线性校正模型的精度(nRMSE)在每小时BAM测量值的17-18%以内。包含多个气象变量和相互作用项的更复杂的MLR模型略微提高了精度(nRMSE),达到约15%。随机森林模型的表现略优于所有MLR模型,相对于BAM的准确率为12-14% (nRMSE)。我们的研究结果突出表明,现有的校正模型──特别是为美国城市开发并用于PurpleAir地图的模型──并不适合孟加拉国的情况。未经校正的PurpleAir cf_atm PM2.5数据的准确度在BAM测量值的25%以内。需要进一步的研究来评估传感器在农村和郊区环境中的性能,并评估孟加拉国和南亚不同气候和源条件下的长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost PurpleAir PM2.5 Sensors in South Asian Conditions: Dhaka, Bangladesh

Performance Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost PurpleAir PM2.5 Sensors in South Asian Conditions: Dhaka, Bangladesh

In this study, we assessed the performance of PurpleAir PM2.5 sensors and developed calibration models in Dhaka, Bangladesh─one of the global hotspots most severely affected by extreme air pollution. We collocated an array of PurpleAir (PA-II-SD) sensors alongside a beta attenuation monitor (BAM: MetOne BAM-1020) across the dry and wet seasons. Specifically, we collocated 10 sensors during the wet season and 20 sensors during the dry season, collecting one month of colocation data per season, covering a wide range of pollution levels and meteorological conditions. Quality-assured hourly concentrations from different PurpleAir units have shown good consistency, with pairwise R2 values generally exceeding 0.95. We developed empirical correction models by testing 29 multiple linear regression (MLR) forms and Random Forest models. Results showed that for hourly average PM2.5 concentrations measured by PurpleAir, a simple linear correction model achieved an accuracy (nRMSE) within 17–18% of hourly BAM measurements. More complex MLR models incorporating several meteorological variables and interaction terms improved accuracy (nRMSE) slightly, to ∼15%. Random Forest models slightly outperformed all MLR models, at 12–14% (nRMSE) accuracy relative to BAM. Our findings highlight that existing correction models─particularly those developed for U.S. cities and used in the PurpleAir map─are inadequate for Bangladeshi conditions. Uncorrected PurpleAir cf_atm PM2.5 data yielded accuracy within 25% of BAM measurements. Further research is needed to assess sensor performance in rural and suburban environments and to evaluate long-term performance under diverse climatological and source conditions in Bangladesh and South Asia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信