高功率短时间房颤消融后症状性肺静脉狭窄的风险。

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1111/pace.70040
Pietro Palmisano, Zefferino Palamà, Antonio L Bartorelli, Salvatore Bonanno, Giuseppe Tricarico, Pasquale Crea, Giovanni Coluccia
{"title":"高功率短时间房颤消融后症状性肺静脉狭窄的风险。","authors":"Pietro Palmisano, Zefferino Palamà, Antonio L Bartorelli, Salvatore Bonanno, Giuseppe Tricarico, Pasquale Crea, Giovanni Coluccia","doi":"10.1111/pace.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis (sPVS) is a rare but severe complication of transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. High-power, short-duration (HPSD) and very HPSD (vHPSD) approaches for radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation have been shown to improve procedural efficiency, with effectiveness and a short-term safety profile comparable to conventional standard-power long-duration (SPLD) ablation. Findings from some previous reports suggest that HPSD may be a risk factor for the development of sPVS. The aim of this multicenter, observational analysis was to compare the incidence of sPVS after AF ablation with HPSD, vHPSD, and SPLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 436 consecutive patients (63.1 ± 9.5 years, 66.5% male, 70.9% with paroxysmal AF) undergoing RF AF ablation were reviewed: 64 were ablated with HPSD, 71 with vHPSD, and 301 with SPLD. The incidence of sPVS during follow-up was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the three groups. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 9 cases of sPVS were identified: 7 (10.9%) in HPSD group, 1 (1.4%) in vHPSD group, and 1 (0.3%) in SPLD group (p < 0.001). The use of HPSD approach was an independent predictor of sPVS (hazard ratio, 20.226; 95% confidence interval, 20.49-164.59; p = 0.005) on multivariable analysis. Seven of 9 patients underwent percutaneous PVs angioplasty and stent implantation (3 veins in 4 patients, 2 veins in 2 patients, 1 vein in 1 patient).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this observational analysis suggest that RF AF ablation using HPSD approach may be associated with an increased risk of sPVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1191-1195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Symptomatic Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With High-Power Short-Duration Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Palmisano, Zefferino Palamà, Antonio L Bartorelli, Salvatore Bonanno, Giuseppe Tricarico, Pasquale Crea, Giovanni Coluccia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis (sPVS) is a rare but severe complication of transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. High-power, short-duration (HPSD) and very HPSD (vHPSD) approaches for radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation have been shown to improve procedural efficiency, with effectiveness and a short-term safety profile comparable to conventional standard-power long-duration (SPLD) ablation. Findings from some previous reports suggest that HPSD may be a risk factor for the development of sPVS. The aim of this multicenter, observational analysis was to compare the incidence of sPVS after AF ablation with HPSD, vHPSD, and SPLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 436 consecutive patients (63.1 ± 9.5 years, 66.5% male, 70.9% with paroxysmal AF) undergoing RF AF ablation were reviewed: 64 were ablated with HPSD, 71 with vHPSD, and 301 with SPLD. The incidence of sPVS during follow-up was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the three groups. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 9 cases of sPVS were identified: 7 (10.9%) in HPSD group, 1 (1.4%) in vHPSD group, and 1 (0.3%) in SPLD group (p < 0.001). The use of HPSD approach was an independent predictor of sPVS (hazard ratio, 20.226; 95% confidence interval, 20.49-164.59; p = 0.005) on multivariable analysis. Seven of 9 patients underwent percutaneous PVs angioplasty and stent implantation (3 veins in 4 patients, 2 veins in 2 patients, 1 vein in 1 patient).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this observational analysis suggest that RF AF ablation using HPSD approach may be associated with an increased risk of sPVS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1191-1195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:症状性肺静脉狭窄(sPVS)是经导管房颤(AF)消融术中一种罕见但严重的并发症。射频(RF)房颤消融的大功率、短时间(HPSD)和非常HPSD (vHPSD)方法已被证明可以提高手术效率,其有效性和短期安全性可与传统的标准功率长时间(SPLD)消融相媲美。先前一些报告的结果表明,HPSD可能是sPVS发展的一个危险因素。这项多中心观察性分析的目的是比较房颤消融后sPVS与HPSD、vHPSD和SPLD的发生率。方法:回顾了436例连续接受射频房颤消融的患者(63.1±9.5岁,66.5%男性,70.9%阵发性房颤)的资料:64例HPSD消融,71例vHPSD消融,301例SPLD消融。评估随访期间sPVS的发生率。结果:三组患者的基线特征无显著差异。在中位随访20个月期间,共发现9例sPVS: HPSD组7例(10.9%),vHPSD组1例(1.4%),SPLD组1例(0.3%)。结论:本观察性分析结果提示,采用HPSD入路射频房颤消融可能与sPVS风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Symptomatic Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With High-Power Short-Duration Approach.

Background: Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis (sPVS) is a rare but severe complication of transcatheter atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. High-power, short-duration (HPSD) and very HPSD (vHPSD) approaches for radiofrequency (RF) AF ablation have been shown to improve procedural efficiency, with effectiveness and a short-term safety profile comparable to conventional standard-power long-duration (SPLD) ablation. Findings from some previous reports suggest that HPSD may be a risk factor for the development of sPVS. The aim of this multicenter, observational analysis was to compare the incidence of sPVS after AF ablation with HPSD, vHPSD, and SPLD.

Methods: Data from 436 consecutive patients (63.1 ± 9.5 years, 66.5% male, 70.9% with paroxysmal AF) undergoing RF AF ablation were reviewed: 64 were ablated with HPSD, 71 with vHPSD, and 301 with SPLD. The incidence of sPVS during follow-up was assessed.

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the three groups. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 9 cases of sPVS were identified: 7 (10.9%) in HPSD group, 1 (1.4%) in vHPSD group, and 1 (0.3%) in SPLD group (p < 0.001). The use of HPSD approach was an independent predictor of sPVS (hazard ratio, 20.226; 95% confidence interval, 20.49-164.59; p = 0.005) on multivariable analysis. Seven of 9 patients underwent percutaneous PVs angioplasty and stent implantation (3 veins in 4 patients, 2 veins in 2 patients, 1 vein in 1 patient).

Conclusions: The results of this observational analysis suggest that RF AF ablation using HPSD approach may be associated with an increased risk of sPVS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信