胸椎II区血管内动脉瘤修复术中左锁骨下动脉的处理:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

Vasiliki Manaki, Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Argirios Giannopoulos, Ioannis Kontes, Andreas Kitromilis, Kiriakos Ktenidis
{"title":"胸椎II区血管内动脉瘤修复术中左锁骨下动脉的处理:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Vasiliki Manaki, Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Argirios Giannopoulos, Ioannis Kontes, Andreas Kitromilis, Kiriakos Ktenidis","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13285-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare interventions for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-NMA2015 guidelines, focusing on interventions for LSA management during TEVAR. Primary endpoints included perioperative ipsilateral stroke, LSA patency, and overall LSA patency.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-four studies (N.=2893) compared carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB), subclavian-to-carotid transposition (SCT), branched endografts, fenestration, chimney technique, and LSA coverage. Branched endografts significantly reduced the risk of perioperative ipsilateral stroke compared to SCT (RR 0.02) and CSB (RR 0.01). CSB and SCT showed better overall LSA patency, but branched endografts demonstrated superior perioperative LSA patency. The chimney technique had the highest likelihood of perioperative spinal cord ischemia, while fenestration was least likely to result in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both endovascular and open procedures are viable, but branched and fenestrated endografts should be prioritized due to superior safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"323-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of the left subclavian artery during zone II thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Manaki, Alkis Bontinis, Vangelis Bontinis, Argirios Giannopoulos, Ioannis Kontes, Andreas Kitromilis, Kiriakos Ktenidis\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13285-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare interventions for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-NMA2015 guidelines, focusing on interventions for LSA management during TEVAR. Primary endpoints included perioperative ipsilateral stroke, LSA patency, and overall LSA patency.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-four studies (N.=2893) compared carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB), subclavian-to-carotid transposition (SCT), branched endografts, fenestration, chimney technique, and LSA coverage. Branched endografts significantly reduced the risk of perioperative ipsilateral stroke compared to SCT (RR 0.02) and CSB (RR 0.01). CSB and SCT showed better overall LSA patency, but branched endografts demonstrated superior perioperative LSA patency. The chimney technique had the highest likelihood of perioperative spinal cord ischemia, while fenestration was least likely to result in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both endovascular and open procedures are viable, but branched and fenestrated endografts should be prioritized due to superior safety and efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"323-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13285-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13285-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是比较II区胸椎血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)期间左锁骨下动脉(LSA)血运重建的干预措施。证据获取:根据PRISMA 2020和PRISMA- nma2015指南进行了系统回顾,重点关注TEVAR期间LSA管理的干预措施。主要终点包括围手术期同侧卒中、LSA通畅和LSA总体通畅。证据综合:24项研究(n =2893)比较了颈动脉-锁骨下搭桥(CSB)、锁骨下-颈动脉转位(SCT)、分支内移植物、开窗、烟囱技术和LSA覆盖。与SCT (RR = 0.02)和CSB (RR = 0.01)相比,分支内移植物可显著降低围手术期同侧卒中的风险。CSB和SCT表现出更好的整体LSA通畅,但分支内移植物表现出更好的围手术期LSA通畅。烟囱技术有最高的可能性围手术期脊髓缺血,而开窗是最不可能导致术后并发症。结论:血管内和开放手术都是可行的,但分支和开窗内移植物因其安全性和有效性更高而应优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of the left subclavian artery during zone II thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare interventions for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-NMA2015 guidelines, focusing on interventions for LSA management during TEVAR. Primary endpoints included perioperative ipsilateral stroke, LSA patency, and overall LSA patency.

Evidence synthesis: Twenty-four studies (N.=2893) compared carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB), subclavian-to-carotid transposition (SCT), branched endografts, fenestration, chimney technique, and LSA coverage. Branched endografts significantly reduced the risk of perioperative ipsilateral stroke compared to SCT (RR 0.02) and CSB (RR 0.01). CSB and SCT showed better overall LSA patency, but branched endografts demonstrated superior perioperative LSA patency. The chimney technique had the highest likelihood of perioperative spinal cord ischemia, while fenestration was least likely to result in postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Both endovascular and open procedures are viable, but branched and fenestrated endografts should be prioritized due to superior safety and efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信