在助产教育中整合生成式人工智能:平衡创新、伦理和学术诚信。

IF 2.3
Megan Koontz, Stefanie Podlog
{"title":"在助产教育中整合生成式人工智能:平衡创新、伦理和学术诚信。","authors":"Megan Koontz, Stefanie Podlog","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Applications driven by large language models (LLMs) are reshaping higher education by offering innovative tools that enhance learning, streamline administrative tasks, and support scholarly work. However, their integration into education institutions raises ethical concerns related to bias, misinformation, and academic integrity, necessitating thoughtful institutional responses. This article explores the evolving role of LLMs in midwifery higher education, providing historical context, key capabilities, and ethical considerations. Using insights from a US-based midwifery program, it highlights strategies for responsible LLM integration, including faculty development, classroom applications, and policy updates. The discussion addresses challenges such as mitigating bias, preventing plagiarism, and fostering critical thinking while ensuring that LLM-fueled applications remain a tool rather than a substitute for student learning. Practical approaches, including faculty training and student guidance, offer a replicable framework for leveraging LLM tools in professional health education while maintaining academic standards and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Midwifery Education: Balancing Innovation, Ethics, and Academic Integrity.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Koontz, Stefanie Podlog\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Applications driven by large language models (LLMs) are reshaping higher education by offering innovative tools that enhance learning, streamline administrative tasks, and support scholarly work. However, their integration into education institutions raises ethical concerns related to bias, misinformation, and academic integrity, necessitating thoughtful institutional responses. This article explores the evolving role of LLMs in midwifery higher education, providing historical context, key capabilities, and ethical considerations. Using insights from a US-based midwifery program, it highlights strategies for responsible LLM integration, including faculty development, classroom applications, and policy updates. The discussion addresses challenges such as mitigating bias, preventing plagiarism, and fostering critical thinking while ensuring that LLM-fueled applications remain a tool rather than a substitute for student learning. Practical approaches, including faculty training and student guidance, offer a replicable framework for leveraging LLM tools in professional health education while maintaining academic standards and equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由大型语言模型(llm)驱动的应用程序通过提供创新的工具来增强学习、简化管理任务和支持学术工作,正在重塑高等教育。然而,它们与教育机构的融合引发了与偏见、错误信息和学术诚信有关的伦理问题,需要机构做出深思熟虑的回应。本文探讨了法学硕士在助产高等教育中不断发展的作用,提供了历史背景,关键能力和道德考虑。利用来自美国助产学项目的见解,它强调了负责任的LLM整合策略,包括教师发展、课堂应用和政策更新。讨论解决了诸如减轻偏见、防止抄袭和培养批判性思维等挑战,同时确保法学硕士推动的应用程序仍然是一种工具,而不是学生学习的替代品。包括教师培训和学生指导在内的实际方法,为在保持学术标准和公平的同时,在专业健康教育中利用法学硕士工具提供了一个可复制的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Midwifery Education: Balancing Innovation, Ethics, and Academic Integrity.

Applications driven by large language models (LLMs) are reshaping higher education by offering innovative tools that enhance learning, streamline administrative tasks, and support scholarly work. However, their integration into education institutions raises ethical concerns related to bias, misinformation, and academic integrity, necessitating thoughtful institutional responses. This article explores the evolving role of LLMs in midwifery higher education, providing historical context, key capabilities, and ethical considerations. Using insights from a US-based midwifery program, it highlights strategies for responsible LLM integration, including faculty development, classroom applications, and policy updates. The discussion addresses challenges such as mitigating bias, preventing plagiarism, and fostering critical thinking while ensuring that LLM-fueled applications remain a tool rather than a substitute for student learning. Practical approaches, including faculty training and student guidance, offer a replicable framework for leveraging LLM tools in professional health education while maintaining academic standards and equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信