“我觉得房间里有一个政治家”:提供者对国家堕胎禁令对医患关系影响的看法。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Samantha M McKetchnie, Elizabeth K Klein, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder, Erika L Sabbath
{"title":"“我觉得房间里有一个政治家”:提供者对国家堕胎禁令对医患关系影响的看法。","authors":"Samantha M McKetchnie, Elizabeth K Klein, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder, Erika L Sabbath","doi":"10.1080/19371918.2025.2557349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>State-level abortion bans enacted after <i>Dobbs v. Jackson</i> may have a deleterious impact on the health of women and may increase maternal morbidity and mortality. In obstetrics-gynecology, strong patient-physician relationships, which are built via patient-centered care strategies, are associated with better pregnancy-related outcomes. Abortion bans may limit physicians' ability to utilize these strategies by restricting care that can legally be provided. Further, all members of the care team, including social workers, may face legal and professional consequences for engaging in options counseling, altering how providers engage with patients. This study assessed OB-GYNs' perceptions of how patient relationships have been impacted by <i>Dobbs</i>, using semi-structured interviews with 54 OB-GYNs from 13 US abortion-restrictive states. Four themes emerged: mistrust and fear of legal consequences; governmental intrusion into the patient-physician relationship; patients assigning blame; and strategies for strengthening relationships post-<i>Dobbs</i>. These findings indicate that abortion bans may have a substantial impact on patient-physician relationships. Knowledge of this dynamic provides context for social workers related to identifying gaps in patients' education about care options and intervention targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":46944,"journal":{"name":"Social Work in Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I Feel Like there's a Politician in the Room\\\": Provider Perceptions of the Impacts of State Abortion Bans on Physician-Patient Relationships.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha M McKetchnie, Elizabeth K Klein, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder, Erika L Sabbath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19371918.2025.2557349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>State-level abortion bans enacted after <i>Dobbs v. Jackson</i> may have a deleterious impact on the health of women and may increase maternal morbidity and mortality. In obstetrics-gynecology, strong patient-physician relationships, which are built via patient-centered care strategies, are associated with better pregnancy-related outcomes. Abortion bans may limit physicians' ability to utilize these strategies by restricting care that can legally be provided. Further, all members of the care team, including social workers, may face legal and professional consequences for engaging in options counseling, altering how providers engage with patients. This study assessed OB-GYNs' perceptions of how patient relationships have been impacted by <i>Dobbs</i>, using semi-structured interviews with 54 OB-GYNs from 13 US abortion-restrictive states. Four themes emerged: mistrust and fear of legal consequences; governmental intrusion into the patient-physician relationship; patients assigning blame; and strategies for strengthening relationships post-<i>Dobbs</i>. These findings indicate that abortion bans may have a substantial impact on patient-physician relationships. Knowledge of this dynamic provides context for social workers related to identifying gaps in patients' education about care options and intervention targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work in Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2025.2557349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2025.2557349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多布斯诉杰克逊案之后颁布的州一级堕胎禁令可能对妇女的健康产生有害影响,并可能增加产妇发病率和死亡率。在妇产科,通过以患者为中心的护理策略建立的牢固的医患关系与更好的妊娠相关结果相关。堕胎禁令可能会限制医生利用这些策略的能力,因为它限制了可以合法提供的护理。此外,护理团队的所有成员,包括社会工作者,可能会因为参与选择咨询而面临法律和专业后果,改变提供者与患者的互动方式。本研究通过对来自美国13个堕胎限制州的54名妇产科医生进行半结构化访谈,评估了妇产科医生对多布斯对患者关系影响的看法。出现了四个主题:不信任和对法律后果的恐惧;政府对医患关系的干预;患者推卸责任;以及在多布斯事件后加强人际关系的策略。这些发现表明,堕胎禁令可能对医患关系产生重大影响。这种动态的知识为社会工作者提供了相关的背景,以确定患者在护理选择和干预目标方面的教育差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"I Feel Like there's a Politician in the Room": Provider Perceptions of the Impacts of State Abortion Bans on Physician-Patient Relationships.

State-level abortion bans enacted after Dobbs v. Jackson may have a deleterious impact on the health of women and may increase maternal morbidity and mortality. In obstetrics-gynecology, strong patient-physician relationships, which are built via patient-centered care strategies, are associated with better pregnancy-related outcomes. Abortion bans may limit physicians' ability to utilize these strategies by restricting care that can legally be provided. Further, all members of the care team, including social workers, may face legal and professional consequences for engaging in options counseling, altering how providers engage with patients. This study assessed OB-GYNs' perceptions of how patient relationships have been impacted by Dobbs, using semi-structured interviews with 54 OB-GYNs from 13 US abortion-restrictive states. Four themes emerged: mistrust and fear of legal consequences; governmental intrusion into the patient-physician relationship; patients assigning blame; and strategies for strengthening relationships post-Dobbs. These findings indicate that abortion bans may have a substantial impact on patient-physician relationships. Knowledge of this dynamic provides context for social workers related to identifying gaps in patients' education about care options and intervention targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Social Work in Public Health (recently re-titled from the Journal of Health & Social Policy to better reflect its focus) provides a much-needed forum for social workers and those in health and health-related professions. This crucial journal focuses on all aspects of policy and social and health care considerations in policy-related matters, including its development, formulation, implementation, evaluation, review, and revision. By blending conceptual and practical considerations, Social Work in Public Health enables authors from many disciplines to examine health and social policy issues, concerns, and questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信