护士对重症监护室非机械通气患者口腔护理障碍的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Auxillia Madhuvu, Marilyn Andrews, Carly Rienecker, Ashilta Prasad, Wendy Pollock
{"title":"护士对重症监护室非机械通气患者口腔护理障碍的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Auxillia Madhuvu, Marilyn Andrews, Carly Rienecker, Ashilta Prasad, Wendy Pollock","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal oral care is essential in preventing non-ventilator hospital-associated pneumonia and enhancing patient comfort. However, nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit are both underreported and understudied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore intensive care nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured in-depth individual interviews. Intensive care nurses with more than 6 months experience were recruited via the professional association, the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and snowballing. Purposive sampling was used, and information power was used to indicate when to stop data collection. Interviews were undertaken with ten intensive care nurses working with adult patients between May and September 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using Framework Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants had a postgraduate qualification in intensive care nursing. Four main themes were derived from the data: (i) challenging patient needs and prioritisation of care, (ii) inadequate knowledge and education, (iii) perception of inadequate use of evidence-based practice and equipment and (iv) structured support needed for evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These themes highlight ongoing issues with nurses' knowledge and education and implementation of available evidence-based practice. Findings suggest the need for a well-established policy to underpin practice. The barriers faced by intensive care nurses need to be addressed to enhance the quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Improving oral care in non-mechanically ventilated patients would decrease the rates of hospital-associated pneumonia, systemic diseases such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and promote patient comfort. A comprehensive strategy using an implementation framework is required to address nurses' knowledge gaps and techniques that enhance evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Views on Barriers to Oral Care in Non-Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Auxillia Madhuvu, Marilyn Andrews, Carly Rienecker, Ashilta Prasad, Wendy Pollock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal oral care is essential in preventing non-ventilator hospital-associated pneumonia and enhancing patient comfort. However, nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit are both underreported and understudied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore intensive care nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured in-depth individual interviews. Intensive care nurses with more than 6 months experience were recruited via the professional association, the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and snowballing. Purposive sampling was used, and information power was used to indicate when to stop data collection. Interviews were undertaken with ten intensive care nurses working with adult patients between May and September 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using Framework Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants had a postgraduate qualification in intensive care nursing. Four main themes were derived from the data: (i) challenging patient needs and prioritisation of care, (ii) inadequate knowledge and education, (iii) perception of inadequate use of evidence-based practice and equipment and (iv) structured support needed for evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These themes highlight ongoing issues with nurses' knowledge and education and implementation of available evidence-based practice. Findings suggest the need for a well-established policy to underpin practice. The barriers faced by intensive care nurses need to be addressed to enhance the quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Improving oral care in non-mechanically ventilated patients would decrease the rates of hospital-associated pneumonia, systemic diseases such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and promote patient comfort. A comprehensive strategy using an implementation framework is required to address nurses' knowledge gaps and techniques that enhance evidence-based practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"e70173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最佳口腔护理对于预防非呼吸机医院相关性肺炎和提高患者舒适度至关重要。然而,护士的临床口腔护理实践的病人没有机械通气在重症监护病房都是少报和研究不足。目的:探讨重症监护护士对非机械通气患者的临床口腔护理实践。研究设计:采用半结构化深度个人访谈的定性描述性研究。通过专业协会、澳大利亚重症监护护士学院和滚雪球式招聘具有6个月以上经验的重症监护护士。采用有目的抽样,并采用信息功率指示何时停止数据采集。在2023年5月至9月期间,对10名与成年患者一起工作的重症监护护士进行了访谈。对访谈进行录音、转录并使用框架分析进行分析。结果:大多数参与者具有重症监护专业研究生学历。从数据中得出了四个主要主题:(i)挑战患者需求和护理优先级,(ii)知识和教育不足,(iii)对基于证据的实践和设备使用不足的认识以及(iv)基于证据的实践所需的结构化支持。结论:这些主题突出了护士知识和教育以及现有循证实践实施方面的持续问题。调查结果表明,需要一项完善的政策来支持实践。重症监护护士面临的障碍需要解决,以提高病人的护理质量。与临床实践的相关性:改善非机械通气患者的口腔护理,可降低医院相关性肺炎、呼吸系统疾病、心血管疾病等全身性疾病的发生率,提高患者舒适度。需要使用实施框架的综合战略来解决护士的知识差距和加强循证实践的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' Views on Barriers to Oral Care in Non-Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Optimal oral care is essential in preventing non-ventilator hospital-associated pneumonia and enhancing patient comfort. However, nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit are both underreported and understudied.

Aim: To explore intensive care nurses' clinical oral care practices for patients not on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units.

Study design: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured in-depth individual interviews. Intensive care nurses with more than 6 months experience were recruited via the professional association, the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and snowballing. Purposive sampling was used, and information power was used to indicate when to stop data collection. Interviews were undertaken with ten intensive care nurses working with adult patients between May and September 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using Framework Analysis.

Results: Most of the participants had a postgraduate qualification in intensive care nursing. Four main themes were derived from the data: (i) challenging patient needs and prioritisation of care, (ii) inadequate knowledge and education, (iii) perception of inadequate use of evidence-based practice and equipment and (iv) structured support needed for evidence-based practice.

Conclusions: These themes highlight ongoing issues with nurses' knowledge and education and implementation of available evidence-based practice. Findings suggest the need for a well-established policy to underpin practice. The barriers faced by intensive care nurses need to be addressed to enhance the quality of patient care.

Relevance to clinical practice: Improving oral care in non-mechanically ventilated patients would decrease the rates of hospital-associated pneumonia, systemic diseases such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and promote patient comfort. A comprehensive strategy using an implementation framework is required to address nurses' knowledge gaps and techniques that enhance evidence-based practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信