立即除颤与院外骤停结果之间的关系:倾向评分分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryu Kimura, Koshi Nakagawa, Tomoya Kinoshi, Hideharu Tanaka
{"title":"立即除颤与院外骤停结果之间的关系:倾向评分分析。","authors":"Ryu Kimura, Koshi Nakagawa, Tomoya Kinoshi, Hideharu Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2558868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between the timing of defibrillation by emergency medical service (EMS) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient prognosis using a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with non-traumatic OHCA aged ≥15 years from 2010 to 2019, with an initial shockable rhythm, who received EMS defibrillation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: defibrillation within 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; immediate defibrillation) or after 2 min (delayed defibrillation). The primary outcome was 1-month survival. We set the primary exposure to immediate defibrillation and employed a 1:1 propensity score matching. Multiple logistic regression analysis estimated the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposure and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 16,970 patients were included in each group. The 1-month survival were 32.5% and 29.1% for immediate defibrillation and delayed defibrillation, respectively. Immediate defibrillation was significantly associated with 1-month survival compared to delayed defibrillation (AOR [95% CI], 1.18 [1.12, 1.24]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Defibrillation within 2 min of starting CPR was associated with 1-month survival, emphasizing the importance of immediate defibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Immediate Defibrillation and Outcomes in Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity Score Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryu Kimura, Koshi Nakagawa, Tomoya Kinoshi, Hideharu Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2558868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between the timing of defibrillation by emergency medical service (EMS) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient prognosis using a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with non-traumatic OHCA aged ≥15 years from 2010 to 2019, with an initial shockable rhythm, who received EMS defibrillation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: defibrillation within 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; immediate defibrillation) or after 2 min (delayed defibrillation). The primary outcome was 1-month survival. We set the primary exposure to immediate defibrillation and employed a 1:1 propensity score matching. Multiple logistic regression analysis estimated the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposure and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 16,970 patients were included in each group. The 1-month survival were 32.5% and 29.1% for immediate defibrillation and delayed defibrillation, respectively. Immediate defibrillation was significantly associated with 1-month survival compared to delayed defibrillation (AOR [95% CI], 1.18 [1.12, 1.24]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Defibrillation within 2 min of starting CPR was associated with 1-month survival, emphasizing the importance of immediate defibrillation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2558868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2558868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过全国数据库研究急诊医疗服务(EMS)除颤时间与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者预后之间的关系。方法:我们纳入了2010年至2019年年龄≥15岁的非创伤性OHCA患者,初始有震荡节律,接受EMS除颤。患者分为2组:心肺复苏2分钟内除颤(CPR;立即除颤)和2分钟后除颤(延迟除颤)。主要终点为1个月生存率。我们将初次接触设置为立即除颤,并采用1:1的倾向评分匹配。多重逻辑回归分析估计了暴露和结果的调整优势比(AOR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:经倾向评分匹配后,两组共纳入16970例患者。立即除颤和延迟除颤的1个月生存率分别为32.5%和29.1%。与延迟除颤相比,立即除颤与1个月生存率显著相关(AOR [95% CI], 1.18[1.12, 1.24])。结论:CPR开始后2分钟内除颤与1个月生存率相关,强调了立即除颤的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Immediate Defibrillation and Outcomes in Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between the timing of defibrillation by emergency medical service (EMS) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient prognosis using a nationwide database.

Methods: We included patients with non-traumatic OHCA aged ≥15 years from 2010 to 2019, with an initial shockable rhythm, who received EMS defibrillation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: defibrillation within 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; immediate defibrillation) or after 2 min (delayed defibrillation). The primary outcome was 1-month survival. We set the primary exposure to immediate defibrillation and employed a 1:1 propensity score matching. Multiple logistic regression analysis estimated the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposure and outcomes.

Results: After propensity score matching, 16,970 patients were included in each group. The 1-month survival were 32.5% and 29.1% for immediate defibrillation and delayed defibrillation, respectively. Immediate defibrillation was significantly associated with 1-month survival compared to delayed defibrillation (AOR [95% CI], 1.18 [1.12, 1.24]).

Conclusions: Defibrillation within 2 min of starting CPR was associated with 1-month survival, emphasizing the importance of immediate defibrillation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信