皮肤温度适应生理应变指数(aPSI)预测运动性热病。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Mark J Buller, Emma Atkinson, Michelle Elizabeth Akana, Peter D Finch, Kyla A Driver, Timothy J Mesite, Roger C DesRochers, Christopher J King, Tim L Bockelman, Michael S Termini
{"title":"皮肤温度适应生理应变指数(aPSI)预测运动性热病。","authors":"Mark J Buller, Emma Atkinson, Michelle Elizabeth Akana, Peter D Finch, Kyla A Driver, Timothy J Mesite, Roger C DesRochers, Christopher J King, Tim L Bockelman, Michael S Termini","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ae05ae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>&#xD;Exertional heat illness (EHI) remains a challenge for those that exercise in hot and humid environments. Physiological status monitoring is an attractive method for assessing EHI risk and a critical component of recommended layered risk management approaches. While there is consensus that some combination of core body temperature, mean skin temperature, heart rate (HR), and hydration provide an indication of heat strain, a field-feasible metric that correlates to EHI incidence has not been identified.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We present a comparison of five practicable heat strain indices (skin temperature, estimated core temperature, core-skin temperature difference, Physiological Strain Index [PSI], and Adaptive Physiological Strain Index [aPSI]) for 5,080 U.S. Marine Corps recruits during an intense multi-day physical assessment. We considered the ability of the calculated indices in predicting the 30 EHI cases that occurred during our study.&#xD;Results:&#xD;aPSI and single-point skin temperature identified 86.7% and 83.3% of EHI cases, respectively (~35 minute alert time and ~15% false positive rate). PSI and core-skin temperature difference were only able to identify 63.3% and 60% of EHI cases. Estimated core temperature only identified 23.3% of EHIs. Critically, the cases missed by aPSI included two individuals with fevers from viral infections, and two cases of heat exhaustion who had moderate field rectal temperatures (< 39°C); the rectal temperatures of false negatives for Tsk ranged from 38.3-40.3°C (mean 39.1 ± 0.7°C).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>aPSI is demonstrated as the first field-practical exertional heat strain index that accurately identifies EHI risk in real time.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin temperature adapted physiological strain index (aPSI) predicts exertional heat illness.\",\"authors\":\"Mark J Buller, Emma Atkinson, Michelle Elizabeth Akana, Peter D Finch, Kyla A Driver, Timothy J Mesite, Roger C DesRochers, Christopher J King, Tim L Bockelman, Michael S Termini\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6579/ae05ae\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>&#xD;Exertional heat illness (EHI) remains a challenge for those that exercise in hot and humid environments. Physiological status monitoring is an attractive method for assessing EHI risk and a critical component of recommended layered risk management approaches. While there is consensus that some combination of core body temperature, mean skin temperature, heart rate (HR), and hydration provide an indication of heat strain, a field-feasible metric that correlates to EHI incidence has not been identified.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We present a comparison of five practicable heat strain indices (skin temperature, estimated core temperature, core-skin temperature difference, Physiological Strain Index [PSI], and Adaptive Physiological Strain Index [aPSI]) for 5,080 U.S. Marine Corps recruits during an intense multi-day physical assessment. We considered the ability of the calculated indices in predicting the 30 EHI cases that occurred during our study.&#xD;Results:&#xD;aPSI and single-point skin temperature identified 86.7% and 83.3% of EHI cases, respectively (~35 minute alert time and ~15% false positive rate). PSI and core-skin temperature difference were only able to identify 63.3% and 60% of EHI cases. Estimated core temperature only identified 23.3% of EHIs. Critically, the cases missed by aPSI included two individuals with fevers from viral infections, and two cases of heat exhaustion who had moderate field rectal temperatures (< 39°C); the rectal temperatures of false negatives for Tsk ranged from 38.3-40.3°C (mean 39.1 ± 0.7°C).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>aPSI is demonstrated as the first field-practical exertional heat strain index that accurately identifies EHI risk in real time.&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae05ae\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae05ae","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于那些在炎热潮湿的环境中锻炼的人来说,劳役性中暑(EHI)仍然是一个挑战。生理状态监测是评估EHI风险的一种有吸引力的方法,也是推荐的分层风险管理方法的关键组成部分。虽然人们一致认为,核心体温、平均皮肤温度、心率(HR)和水合作用的某些组合可以指示热应变,但尚未确定与EHI发病率相关的现场可行指标。方法:我们对5080名美国海军陆战队新兵进行了为期多天的高强度体能评估,比较了五种可行的热应变指数(皮肤温度、估计核心温度、核心-皮肤温差、生理应变指数[PSI]和适应性生理应变指数[aPSI])。结果:aPSI和单点皮肤温度分别识别了86.7%和83.3%的EHI病例(警报时间~35分钟,假阳性率~15%)。PSI和核皮温差仅能识别63.3%和60%的EHI病例。估计的核心温度仅识别出23.3%的EHIs。关键的是,aPSI遗漏的病例包括两例因病毒感染而发烧的患者,以及两例热衰竭患者,他们的现场直肠温度适中(< 39°C);Tsk假阴性患者直肠温度范围38.3 ~ 40.3°C(平均39.1±0.7°C)。意义:aPSI是第一个能够实时准确识别EHI风险的现场应用热应变指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skin temperature adapted physiological strain index (aPSI) predicts exertional heat illness.

Objective: Exertional heat illness (EHI) remains a challenge for those that exercise in hot and humid environments. Physiological status monitoring is an attractive method for assessing EHI risk and a critical component of recommended layered risk management approaches. While there is consensus that some combination of core body temperature, mean skin temperature, heart rate (HR), and hydration provide an indication of heat strain, a field-feasible metric that correlates to EHI incidence has not been identified.

Approach: We present a comparison of five practicable heat strain indices (skin temperature, estimated core temperature, core-skin temperature difference, Physiological Strain Index [PSI], and Adaptive Physiological Strain Index [aPSI]) for 5,080 U.S. Marine Corps recruits during an intense multi-day physical assessment. We considered the ability of the calculated indices in predicting the 30 EHI cases that occurred during our study. Results: aPSI and single-point skin temperature identified 86.7% and 83.3% of EHI cases, respectively (~35 minute alert time and ~15% false positive rate). PSI and core-skin temperature difference were only able to identify 63.3% and 60% of EHI cases. Estimated core temperature only identified 23.3% of EHIs. Critically, the cases missed by aPSI included two individuals with fevers from viral infections, and two cases of heat exhaustion who had moderate field rectal temperatures (< 39°C); the rectal temperatures of false negatives for Tsk ranged from 38.3-40.3°C (mean 39.1 ± 0.7°C).

Significance: aPSI is demonstrated as the first field-practical exertional heat strain index that accurately identifies EHI risk in real time. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信