澳大利亚和新西兰奥特罗亚地区注射长效青霉素临床指南变化的范围审查。

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shriyutha Vaka, Lisa J Whop, Sophie J Kirk, Laurens Manning, Rosemary Wyber
{"title":"澳大利亚和新西兰奥特罗亚地区注射长效青霉素临床指南变化的范围审查。","authors":"Shriyutha Vaka, Lisa J Whop, Sophie J Kirk, Laurens Manning, Rosemary Wyber","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review explores existing clinical guidelines on administration of benzathine benzylpenicillin (Bicillin L-A, Pfizer Australia) in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The objective is to understand existing delivery guidance to address variation in care and cultural safety considerations, to support messaging during periods of stockout and to inform planning for new administration techniques.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Semi-structured Google search to identify publicly available clinical resources for each jurisdiction of Australia and for New Zealand. The search was conducted from October to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Government reports and publicly available clinical guidelines were included. This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This guideline review demonstrates that guidance on administration of Bicillin L-A in Australia and New Zealand has strong, consistent, biomedical recommendations but underdeveloped cultural considerations. Across the features of culturally safe practice, existing clinical guidelines provide consistent information on biomedical knowledge and skills, less information about practising culturally safe behaviours and relatively little guidance on addressing power differentials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cultural safety inclusions should be considered for future administration guidance development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping review of variation in clinical guidelines for delivery of injectable long-acting penicillin across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Shriyutha Vaka, Lisa J Whop, Sophie J Kirk, Laurens Manning, Rosemary Wyber\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review explores existing clinical guidelines on administration of benzathine benzylpenicillin (Bicillin L-A, Pfizer Australia) in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The objective is to understand existing delivery guidance to address variation in care and cultural safety considerations, to support messaging during periods of stockout and to inform planning for new administration techniques.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Semi-structured Google search to identify publicly available clinical resources for each jurisdiction of Australia and for New Zealand. The search was conducted from October to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Government reports and publicly available clinical guidelines were included. This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This guideline review demonstrates that guidance on administration of Bicillin L-A in Australia and New Zealand has strong, consistent, biomedical recommendations but underdeveloped cultural considerations. Across the features of culturally safe practice, existing clinical guidelines provide consistent information on biomedical knowledge and skills, less information about practising culturally safe behaviours and relatively little guidance on addressing power differentials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cultural safety inclusions should be considered for future administration guidance development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述探讨了澳大利亚和新西兰现行的苄星苄青霉素(Bicillin L-A,辉瑞澳大利亚公司)的临床应用指南。目的是了解现有的交付指南,以解决护理和文化安全方面的差异,在缺货期间支持信息传递,并为新的管理技术规划提供信息。数据来源:半结构化谷歌搜索,以确定澳大利亚和新西兰每个司法管辖区的公开可用临床资源。搜寻工作于2023年10月至12月进行。设计:包括政府报告和公开的临床指南。根据系统评价和荟萃分析范围评价扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)报告该范围评价。结果:本指南综述表明,澳大利亚和新西兰的比西林L-A给药指南具有强有力的、一致的生物医学建议,但缺乏文化考虑。就文化安全做法的特点而言,现有临床指南提供了关于生物医学知识和技能的一致信息,关于实践文化安全行为的信息较少,关于解决权力差异的指导也相对较少。结论:在未来的行政指导发展中应考虑文化安全内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoping review of variation in clinical guidelines for delivery of injectable long-acting penicillin across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Objective: This scoping review explores existing clinical guidelines on administration of benzathine benzylpenicillin (Bicillin L-A, Pfizer Australia) in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The objective is to understand existing delivery guidance to address variation in care and cultural safety considerations, to support messaging during periods of stockout and to inform planning for new administration techniques.

Data sources: Semi-structured Google search to identify publicly available clinical resources for each jurisdiction of Australia and for New Zealand. The search was conducted from October to December 2023.

Design: Government reports and publicly available clinical guidelines were included. This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Results: This guideline review demonstrates that guidance on administration of Bicillin L-A in Australia and New Zealand has strong, consistent, biomedical recommendations but underdeveloped cultural considerations. Across the features of culturally safe practice, existing clinical guidelines provide consistent information on biomedical knowledge and skills, less information about practising culturally safe behaviours and relatively little guidance on addressing power differentials.

Conclusions: Cultural safety inclusions should be considered for future administration guidance development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信