Hounsfield单元在股骨粗隆间骨折术前骨密度评估中的验证。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Shuichi Eto, Shunji Imanishi, Wataru Komuta, Yosuke Oba, Nobumichi Hidaka
{"title":"Hounsfield单元在股骨粗隆间骨折术前骨密度评估中的验证。","authors":"Shuichi Eto, Shunji Imanishi, Wataru Komuta, Yosuke Oba, Nobumichi Hidaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) are strongly correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) and may aid in osteoporosis screening. However, there is no standardized method for assessing bone density in displaced femoral head fractures. This study aimed to measure HU values in the femoral head using preoperative post-fracture CT images of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures and investigate whether it correlated with BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed post-fracture CT images of intertrochanteric fractures (n = 52). Hounsfield units were measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using the femoral neck axis as a reference. Severe osteoporosis was defined as <60 % of the young adult mean (YAM) (T-score <-3.3). We evaluated the correlations between HU and DXA-derived BMD, along with reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement bias (Bland-Altman analysis), and diagnostic performance (receiver operating characteristic [ROC]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HU values demonstrated strong associations with BMD across all planes, with the highest correlations observed in the axial and coronal planes. ICC values exceeded 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no proportional bias but a fixed bias in the sagittal plane, whereas the narrowest limits of agreement were observed in the axial plane. Based on the ROC analysis, an axial HU cutoff of 151.5 identified severe osteoporosis (sensitivity, 0.756; specificity, 0.783).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Axial HU measurements were most reliable for assessing the bone quality. This cutoff value may help identify severe osteoporosis and determine eligibility for cement augmentation. However, further validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Hounsfield units for preoperative bone mineral density assessment in intertrochanteric femoral fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Shuichi Eto, Shunji Imanishi, Wataru Komuta, Yosuke Oba, Nobumichi Hidaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) are strongly correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) and may aid in osteoporosis screening. However, there is no standardized method for assessing bone density in displaced femoral head fractures. This study aimed to measure HU values in the femoral head using preoperative post-fracture CT images of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures and investigate whether it correlated with BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed post-fracture CT images of intertrochanteric fractures (n = 52). Hounsfield units were measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using the femoral neck axis as a reference. Severe osteoporosis was defined as <60 % of the young adult mean (YAM) (T-score <-3.3). We evaluated the correlations between HU and DXA-derived BMD, along with reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement bias (Bland-Altman analysis), and diagnostic performance (receiver operating characteristic [ROC]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HU values demonstrated strong associations with BMD across all planes, with the highest correlations observed in the axial and coronal planes. ICC values exceeded 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no proportional bias but a fixed bias in the sagittal plane, whereas the narrowest limits of agreement were observed in the axial plane. Based on the ROC analysis, an axial HU cutoff of 151.5 identified severe osteoporosis (sensitivity, 0.756; specificity, 0.783).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Axial HU measurements were most reliable for assessing the bone quality. This cutoff value may help identify severe osteoporosis and determine eligibility for cement augmentation. However, further validation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.08.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)上的Hounsfield单位(HU)与骨密度(BMD)密切相关,可能有助于骨质疏松症筛查。然而,目前还没有标准的方法来评估移位性股骨头骨折的骨密度。本研究旨在通过股骨粗隆间骨折患者的术前骨折后CT图像测量股骨头的HU值,并探讨其与双能x线吸收仪(DXA)测量的骨密度是否相关。材料和方法:回顾性分析52例股骨粗隆间骨折的骨折后CT图像。以股骨颈轴为参照,在轴位、冠状位和矢状面测量Hounsfield单位。结果:HU值与BMD在所有平面上都有很强的相关性,其中轴状面和冠状面相关性最高。ICC值超过0.9,可靠性极佳。Bland-Altman分析显示,在矢状面无比例偏倚,但有固定偏倚,而在轴向面观察到最窄的一致限度。根据ROC分析,轴向HU截断值为151.5确定骨质疏松严重(敏感性0.756,特异性0.783)。结论:轴向HU测量是评估骨质量最可靠的方法。这个临界值可以帮助鉴别严重的骨质疏松症并确定是否有资格进行骨水泥增强。然而,还需要进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Hounsfield units for preoperative bone mineral density assessment in intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Background: Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) are strongly correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) and may aid in osteoporosis screening. However, there is no standardized method for assessing bone density in displaced femoral head fractures. This study aimed to measure HU values in the femoral head using preoperative post-fracture CT images of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures and investigate whether it correlated with BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed post-fracture CT images of intertrochanteric fractures (n = 52). Hounsfield units were measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using the femoral neck axis as a reference. Severe osteoporosis was defined as <60 % of the young adult mean (YAM) (T-score <-3.3). We evaluated the correlations between HU and DXA-derived BMD, along with reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement bias (Bland-Altman analysis), and diagnostic performance (receiver operating characteristic [ROC]).

Results: HU values demonstrated strong associations with BMD across all planes, with the highest correlations observed in the axial and coronal planes. ICC values exceeded 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no proportional bias but a fixed bias in the sagittal plane, whereas the narrowest limits of agreement were observed in the axial plane. Based on the ROC analysis, an axial HU cutoff of 151.5 identified severe osteoporosis (sensitivity, 0.756; specificity, 0.783).

Conclusions: Axial HU measurements were most reliable for assessing the bone quality. This cutoff value may help identify severe osteoporosis and determine eligibility for cement augmentation. However, further validation is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信