怀疑小儿距跟关节联合的超声或x线检查。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Xiong-Tao Li, Xian-Tao Shen, Xing Wu
{"title":"怀疑小儿距跟关节联合的超声或x线检查。","authors":"Xiong-Tao Li, Xian-Tao Shen, Xing Wu","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Talocalcaneal coalition is a common tarsal coalition, but incomplete ossification in children often leads to underdiagnosis using traditional radiographic signs like the \"C sign\" and \"talar beak.\" Ultrasonography, which is radiation-free and detects unossified cartilage, has not been studied for pediatric talocalcaneal coalition. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography versus radiography in diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-six suspected talocalcaneal coalitions underwent ultrasonography, radiography, and 3-dimensional CT scanning. Three pediatric orthopaedic surgeons assessed ultrasound results and radiographic signs (\"C sign\" and \"talar beak\") for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Using CT as the diagnostic standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasonography and radiographic signs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 86 suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalitions, the mean age was 12.3 years. The interobserver reliability for the \"C sign\" was moderate (κ=0.55), while the interobserver reliability for ultrasonography was almost perfect (κ=0.87). Using 3-dimensional CT scanning as the diagnostic standard, the specificity and sensitivity of the \"C sign\" for diagnosing talocalcaneal coalition in children were 86% and 54%, respectively. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98%. The \"talar beak\" had only 3 true positives and 25 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 11%, which was statistically significant (P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"C sign\" is useful but less accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, while the \"talar beak\" is unsuitable due to low sensitivity. Ultrasonography can accurately detect pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, even in unossified cases. Compared with radiography, ultrasonography is more suitable for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-diagnostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonography or Radiography for Suspected Pediatric Talocalcaneal Coalition.\",\"authors\":\"Xiong-Tao Li, Xian-Tao Shen, Xing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Talocalcaneal coalition is a common tarsal coalition, but incomplete ossification in children often leads to underdiagnosis using traditional radiographic signs like the \\\"C sign\\\" and \\\"talar beak.\\\" Ultrasonography, which is radiation-free and detects unossified cartilage, has not been studied for pediatric talocalcaneal coalition. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography versus radiography in diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-six suspected talocalcaneal coalitions underwent ultrasonography, radiography, and 3-dimensional CT scanning. Three pediatric orthopaedic surgeons assessed ultrasound results and radiographic signs (\\\"C sign\\\" and \\\"talar beak\\\") for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Using CT as the diagnostic standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasonography and radiographic signs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 86 suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalitions, the mean age was 12.3 years. The interobserver reliability for the \\\"C sign\\\" was moderate (κ=0.55), while the interobserver reliability for ultrasonography was almost perfect (κ=0.87). Using 3-dimensional CT scanning as the diagnostic standard, the specificity and sensitivity of the \\\"C sign\\\" for diagnosing talocalcaneal coalition in children were 86% and 54%, respectively. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98%. The \\\"talar beak\\\" had only 3 true positives and 25 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 11%, which was statistically significant (P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \\\"C sign\\\" is useful but less accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, while the \\\"talar beak\\\" is unsuitable due to low sensitivity. Ultrasonography can accurately detect pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, even in unossified cases. Compared with radiography, ultrasonography is more suitable for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-diagnostic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:距足关节联合是一种常见的跗骨联合,但儿童不完全骨化常常导致传统影像学征象如“C征”和“距骨喙”的诊断不足。超声检查是无辐射的,可以检测未硬化的软骨,但尚未对小儿距骨与跟骨联合进行研究。本研究评估了超声检查与x线检查在诊断疑似小儿距骨-跟骨联合中的准确性和可靠性。方法:对86例疑似距跟骨联合进行超声、x线及三维CT扫描。三名儿科骨科医生评估了超声结果和x线征象(“C征”和“距喙”)在观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。以CT为诊断标准,评价超声及影像学征象的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果:在86例疑似小儿距骨跟骨联合病例中,平均年龄为12.3岁。对“C”标志的观察者间信度为中等(κ=0.55),而对超声图像的观察者间信度几乎为完美(κ=0.87)。以三维CT扫描作为诊断标准,“C征”诊断儿童距跟关节联合的特异性和敏感性分别为86%和54%。超声检查显示灵敏度为96%,特异性为98%。“距骨喙”仅有3例真阳性,25例假阴性,敏感性为11%,差异有统计学意义(P)。结论:“C征”诊断疑似小儿距骨-跟骨联合虽有用,但准确性不及超声,而“距骨喙”因敏感性低而不适合。超声检查可以准确地发现小儿距骨跟骨联合,即使在未石化的情况下。与x线摄影相比,超声检查更适合诊断疑似小儿距骨-跟骨联合。证据等级:iii级诊断性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasonography or Radiography for Suspected Pediatric Talocalcaneal Coalition.

Background: Talocalcaneal coalition is a common tarsal coalition, but incomplete ossification in children often leads to underdiagnosis using traditional radiographic signs like the "C sign" and "talar beak." Ultrasonography, which is radiation-free and detects unossified cartilage, has not been studied for pediatric talocalcaneal coalition. This study evaluates the accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography versus radiography in diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.

Methods: Eighty-six suspected talocalcaneal coalitions underwent ultrasonography, radiography, and 3-dimensional CT scanning. Three pediatric orthopaedic surgeons assessed ultrasound results and radiographic signs ("C sign" and "talar beak") for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Using CT as the diagnostic standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasonography and radiographic signs were evaluated.

Results: In a cohort of 86 suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalitions, the mean age was 12.3 years. The interobserver reliability for the "C sign" was moderate (κ=0.55), while the interobserver reliability for ultrasonography was almost perfect (κ=0.87). Using 3-dimensional CT scanning as the diagnostic standard, the specificity and sensitivity of the "C sign" for diagnosing talocalcaneal coalition in children were 86% and 54%, respectively. Ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98%. The "talar beak" had only 3 true positives and 25 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 11%, which was statistically significant (P <0.001).

Conclusions: The "C sign" is useful but less accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, while the "talar beak" is unsuitable due to low sensitivity. Ultrasonography can accurately detect pediatric talocalcaneal coalition, even in unossified cases. Compared with radiography, ultrasonography is more suitable for diagnosing suspected pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.

Level of evidence: Level III-diagnostic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信