基于机器学习的血液透析患者分析性高血压预测模型。

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yu Wang, Hongming Zhou, Qi Guo, Kang Wang, Yehua Luo, Shaodong Luan, Donge Tang, Shuangyong Dong, Lianghong Yin, Yong Dai
{"title":"基于机器学习的血液透析患者分析性高血压预测模型。","authors":"Yu Wang, Hongming Zhou, Qi Guo, Kang Wang, Yehua Luo, Shaodong Luan, Donge Tang, Shuangyong Dong, Lianghong Yin, Yong Dai","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complication during HD, is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular and neurological sequelae if unmanaged. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-driven early-alert system for IDH risk prediction by integrating demographic profiles and dialysis session records, enabling clinicians to preemptively identify high-risk patients and prioritize targeted monitoring. Two clinical prediction models (IDH-1 and IDH-2) were developed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and TabNet algorithms. IDH-1 estimates immediate hypertension risk by analyzing pre-dialysis vital signs and longitudinal treatment patterns, whereas IDH-2 predicts subsequent session risks by synthesizing real-time dialysis parameters with historical biomarkers. Model performance was rigorously validated using standardized metrics, including AUC-ROC, sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score, to ensure clinical applicability. 185,125 HD sessions as training set and 71,427 sessions as testing set were used in this study. For IDH-1, the LGBM model demonstrated superior discriminative capacity (AUC: 0.87; recall: 0.73; F1 score: 0.36), outperforming SVM and TabNet. Similarly, LGBM achieved the highest performance for IDH-2 (AUC: 0.74; recall: 0.56; F1 score: 0.26). Most significant parameters in IDH-1 Predictor with LGBM were pre-dialysis diastolic pressures, historical mean arterial pressure, and historical average IDH episodes. For the IDH-2 model with LGBM, historical average IDH episodes and post-dialysis systolic pressures were most important parameters. This study provides two kinds of superior discriminative capacity LGBM model for IDH predicting. The proposed models offer a scalable framework for personalized risk stratification, potentially mitigating adverse outcomes in hemodialysis populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction Model of Intradialytic Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Based on Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wang, Hongming Zhou, Qi Guo, Kang Wang, Yehua Luo, Shaodong Luan, Donge Tang, Shuangyong Dong, Lianghong Yin, Yong Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complication during HD, is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular and neurological sequelae if unmanaged. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-driven early-alert system for IDH risk prediction by integrating demographic profiles and dialysis session records, enabling clinicians to preemptively identify high-risk patients and prioritize targeted monitoring. Two clinical prediction models (IDH-1 and IDH-2) were developed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and TabNet algorithms. IDH-1 estimates immediate hypertension risk by analyzing pre-dialysis vital signs and longitudinal treatment patterns, whereas IDH-2 predicts subsequent session risks by synthesizing real-time dialysis parameters with historical biomarkers. Model performance was rigorously validated using standardized metrics, including AUC-ROC, sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score, to ensure clinical applicability. 185,125 HD sessions as training set and 71,427 sessions as testing set were used in this study. For IDH-1, the LGBM model demonstrated superior discriminative capacity (AUC: 0.87; recall: 0.73; F1 score: 0.36), outperforming SVM and TabNet. Similarly, LGBM achieved the highest performance for IDH-2 (AUC: 0.74; recall: 0.56; F1 score: 0.26). Most significant parameters in IDH-1 Predictor with LGBM were pre-dialysis diastolic pressures, historical mean arterial pressure, and historical average IDH episodes. For the IDH-2 model with LGBM, historical average IDH episodes and post-dialysis systolic pressures were most important parameters. This study provides two kinds of superior discriminative capacity LGBM model for IDH predicting. The proposed models offer a scalable framework for personalized risk stratification, potentially mitigating adverse outcomes in hemodialysis populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02237-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肾脏疾病(CKD),特别是终末期肾脏疾病(ESRD)的全球负担不断上升,加剧了对血液透析(HD)的依赖,给卫生保健系统和患者带来了巨大的财政和运营负担。透析性高血压(IDH)是HD期间的一个重要并发症,如果不加以控制,可能会导致危及生命的心血管和神经系统后遗症。本研究旨在通过整合人口统计资料和透析记录,开发一种机器学习(ML)驱动的IDH风险预测预警系统,使临床医生能够先发制人地识别高风险患者并优先进行有针对性的监测。采用光梯度增强机(LGBM)、支持向量机(SVM)和TabNet算法建立IDH-1和IDH-2临床预测模型。IDH-1通过分析透析前生命体征和纵向治疗模式来估计即时高血压风险,而IDH-2通过综合实时透析参数和历史生物标志物来预测后续治疗风险。采用标准化指标严格验证模型性能,包括AUC-ROC、敏感性、准确性和F1评分,以确保临床适用性。本研究使用185,125个HD会话作为训练集,71,427个会话作为测试集。对于IDH-1, LGBM模型表现出更好的判别能力(AUC: 0.87;召回率:0.73;F1得分:0.36),优于SVM和TabNet。同样,LGBM在IDH-2上的表现最高(AUC: 0.74;召回率:0.56;F1评分:0.26)。IDH-1预测器与LGBM最重要的参数是透析前舒张压、历史平均动脉压和历史平均IDH发作次数。对于合并LGBM的IDH-2模型,历史平均IDH发作次数和透析后收缩压是最重要的参数。本研究提供了两种较优判别能力LGBM模型用于IDH预测。提出的模型为个性化风险分层提供了一个可扩展的框架,可能减轻血液透析人群的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction Model of Intradialytic Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Based on Machine Learning.

The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complication during HD, is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular and neurological sequelae if unmanaged. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-driven early-alert system for IDH risk prediction by integrating demographic profiles and dialysis session records, enabling clinicians to preemptively identify high-risk patients and prioritize targeted monitoring. Two clinical prediction models (IDH-1 and IDH-2) were developed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and TabNet algorithms. IDH-1 estimates immediate hypertension risk by analyzing pre-dialysis vital signs and longitudinal treatment patterns, whereas IDH-2 predicts subsequent session risks by synthesizing real-time dialysis parameters with historical biomarkers. Model performance was rigorously validated using standardized metrics, including AUC-ROC, sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score, to ensure clinical applicability. 185,125 HD sessions as training set and 71,427 sessions as testing set were used in this study. For IDH-1, the LGBM model demonstrated superior discriminative capacity (AUC: 0.87; recall: 0.73; F1 score: 0.36), outperforming SVM and TabNet. Similarly, LGBM achieved the highest performance for IDH-2 (AUC: 0.74; recall: 0.56; F1 score: 0.26). Most significant parameters in IDH-1 Predictor with LGBM were pre-dialysis diastolic pressures, historical mean arterial pressure, and historical average IDH episodes. For the IDH-2 model with LGBM, historical average IDH episodes and post-dialysis systolic pressures were most important parameters. This study provides two kinds of superior discriminative capacity LGBM model for IDH predicting. The proposed models offer a scalable framework for personalized risk stratification, potentially mitigating adverse outcomes in hemodialysis populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信