{"title":"肝细胞癌热消融期间的心动过缓反应:程序性疼痛严重程度和自主神经失衡的影响。","authors":"Yasuyuki Komiyama, Masaru Muraoka, Tetsuya Iijima, Leona Osawa, Hitomi Takada, Yuichiro Suzuki, Mitsuaki Sato, Shinichi Takano, Shinya Maekawa, Atsunori Tsuchiya, Nobuyuki Enomoto","doi":"10.1111/hepr.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Bradycardic responses frequently occur during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the impact of procedural pain severity and patient-specific factors remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for bradycardic responses, focusing on procedural pain and autonomic regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 267 patients with solitary HCC who underwent RFA or MWA between 2019 and 2024. Bradycardic responses were defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in heart rate from baseline or < 50 bpm. Patients were categorized by procedural pain severity using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus administration. Risk factors for bradycardia were assessed by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bradycardic responses occurred in 70 patients (26.2%). Severe procedural pain (odds ratio [OR], 2.26 and p = 0.007) and primary HCC (OR, 2.68 and p = 0.002) were independent risk factors. In patients without severe pain, absence of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use increased bradycardia risk (OR, 0.14 and p = 0.013). Most bradycardic events (61.4%) occurred within 3 min of ablation initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bradycardic responses during RFA and MWA are common and linked to procedural pain severity and autonomic imbalance. Comprehensive management, including pain control, medication review, and addressing procedural anxiety through counseling or sedation, may reduce risks and enhance procedural safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bradycardic Responses During Thermal Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of Procedural Pain Severity and Autonomic Imbalance.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuyuki Komiyama, Masaru Muraoka, Tetsuya Iijima, Leona Osawa, Hitomi Takada, Yuichiro Suzuki, Mitsuaki Sato, Shinichi Takano, Shinya Maekawa, Atsunori Tsuchiya, Nobuyuki Enomoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hepr.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Bradycardic responses frequently occur during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the impact of procedural pain severity and patient-specific factors remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for bradycardic responses, focusing on procedural pain and autonomic regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 267 patients with solitary HCC who underwent RFA or MWA between 2019 and 2024. Bradycardic responses were defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in heart rate from baseline or < 50 bpm. Patients were categorized by procedural pain severity using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus administration. Risk factors for bradycardia were assessed by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bradycardic responses occurred in 70 patients (26.2%). Severe procedural pain (odds ratio [OR], 2.26 and p = 0.007) and primary HCC (OR, 2.68 and p = 0.002) were independent risk factors. In patients without severe pain, absence of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use increased bradycardia risk (OR, 0.14 and p = 0.013). Most bradycardic events (61.4%) occurred within 3 min of ablation initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bradycardic responses during RFA and MWA are common and linked to procedural pain severity and autonomic imbalance. Comprehensive management, including pain control, medication review, and addressing procedural anxiety through counseling or sedation, may reduce risks and enhance procedural safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在肝细胞癌(HCC)的射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)治疗过程中经常发生心动过缓反应,但手术疼痛严重程度和患者特异性因素的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估心动过缓反应的发生率和危险因素,重点关注程序性疼痛和自主调节。方法:本回顾性研究包括267例2019年至2024年间接受RFA或MWA治疗的单发HCC患者。心动过缓反应定义为心率较基线降低≥30%。结果:70例患者(26.2%)发生心动过缓反应。严重的手术疼痛(比值比[OR], 2.26, p = 0.007)和原发性肝癌(比值比[OR], 2.68, p = 0.002)是独立的危险因素。在没有剧烈疼痛的患者中,不使用血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)会增加心动过缓的风险(OR, 0.14和p = 0.013)。大多数心动过缓事件(61.4%)发生在消融开始后3分钟内。结论:RFA和MWA期间的心动过缓反应是常见的,并与程序性疼痛严重程度和自主神经失衡有关。综合管理,包括疼痛控制,药物审查,通过咨询或镇静解决程序焦虑,可以降低风险并提高程序安全性。
Bradycardic Responses During Thermal Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of Procedural Pain Severity and Autonomic Imbalance.
Aim: Bradycardic responses frequently occur during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the impact of procedural pain severity and patient-specific factors remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for bradycardic responses, focusing on procedural pain and autonomic regulation.
Methods: This retrospective study included 267 patients with solitary HCC who underwent RFA or MWA between 2019 and 2024. Bradycardic responses were defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in heart rate from baseline or < 50 bpm. Patients were categorized by procedural pain severity using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus administration. Risk factors for bradycardia were assessed by logistic regression.
Results: Bradycardic responses occurred in 70 patients (26.2%). Severe procedural pain (odds ratio [OR], 2.26 and p = 0.007) and primary HCC (OR, 2.68 and p = 0.002) were independent risk factors. In patients without severe pain, absence of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use increased bradycardia risk (OR, 0.14 and p = 0.013). Most bradycardic events (61.4%) occurred within 3 min of ablation initiation.
Conclusions: Bradycardic responses during RFA and MWA are common and linked to procedural pain severity and autonomic imbalance. Comprehensive management, including pain control, medication review, and addressing procedural anxiety through counseling or sedation, may reduce risks and enhance procedural safety.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.