意大利子宫颈癌筛查指南。在基于风险的方法和GRADE方法的HPV筛查中使用生物标志物的多社会建议。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Silvia Gori, Francesco Venturelli, Francesca Carozzi, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Annarosa Del Mistro
{"title":"意大利子宫颈癌筛查指南。在基于风险的方法和GRADE方法的HPV筛查中使用生物标志物的多社会建议。","authors":"Silvia Gori, Francesco Venturelli, Francesca Carozzi, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Annarosa Del Mistro","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Council recommends adopting risk-based screening when relevant. In triaging HPV-positive women, it can be an effective strategy to reduce overtreatment and referral to colposcopy. HPV genotyping and p16/ki67 expression may allow a better risk stratification than cytology. In Italy, recommendations on their use (alone or combined) in screening were developed by a multi-professional (nine scientific societies) and multidisciplinary working group (including patients and decision makers). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Data from large clinical trials on screening populations with long follow-up instructed the biomarkers' evaluation. The working group defined the CIN3+ risk thresholds (a surrogate marker of cancer risk) to guide decisions on management: immediate colposcopy, referral to 1-year and 3-year retesting. The risk-based approach allowed to reduce the number of possible strategies to be compared to five specific healthcare questions framed as PICOs. The prioritised outcomes were risk of cancer and of CIN3+ in HPV+/triage-negative women, number of colposcopies, number of samples to be taken, and number of unneeded treatments. The combination of morphological markers (cytology or p16/ki67) and extended HPV genotyping was the only strategy with a conditional recommendation in favour when compared with cytology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italian guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Multisocietal recommendations on the use of biomarkers in HPV screening with risk-based approach and GRADE methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Gori, Francesco Venturelli, Francesca Carozzi, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Annarosa Del Mistro\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The European Council recommends adopting risk-based screening when relevant. In triaging HPV-positive women, it can be an effective strategy to reduce overtreatment and referral to colposcopy. HPV genotyping and p16/ki67 expression may allow a better risk stratification than cytology. In Italy, recommendations on their use (alone or combined) in screening were developed by a multi-professional (nine scientific societies) and multidisciplinary working group (including patients and decision makers). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Data from large clinical trials on screening populations with long follow-up instructed the biomarkers' evaluation. The working group defined the CIN3+ risk thresholds (a surrogate marker of cancer risk) to guide decisions on management: immediate colposcopy, referral to 1-year and 3-year retesting. The risk-based approach allowed to reduce the number of possible strategies to be compared to five specific healthcare questions framed as PICOs. The prioritised outcomes were risk of cancer and of CIN3+ in HPV+/triage-negative women, number of colposcopies, number of samples to be taken, and number of unneeded treatments. The combination of morphological markers (cytology or p16/ki67) and extended HPV genotyping was the only strategy with a conditional recommendation in favour when compared with cytology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03161-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲理事会建议在相关情况下采用基于风险的筛查。在筛选hpv阳性妇女时,它可以是减少过度治疗和转介到阴道镜检查的有效策略。HPV基因分型和p16/ki67表达可能比细胞学更好地进行风险分层。在意大利,一个多专业(9个科学学会)和多学科工作组(包括患者和决策者)制定了关于在筛查中(单独或联合)使用它们的建议。建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)决策证据框架被使用。来自长期随访的筛查人群的大型临床试验的数据指导了生物标志物的评估。工作组定义了CIN3+风险阈值(癌症风险的替代标记),以指导治疗决策:立即阴道镜检查,转诊1年和3年重新检测。基于风险的方法可以减少与作为pico框架的五个具体医疗保健问题进行比较的可能策略的数量。优先考虑的结果是HPV阳性/分诊阴性妇女的癌症和CIN3+风险、阴道镜检查次数、取样次数和不必要的治疗次数。与细胞学相比,形态学标记(细胞学或p16/ki67)和扩展HPV基因分型的结合是唯一有条件推荐的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Italian guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Multisocietal recommendations on the use of biomarkers in HPV screening with risk-based approach and GRADE methodology.

The European Council recommends adopting risk-based screening when relevant. In triaging HPV-positive women, it can be an effective strategy to reduce overtreatment and referral to colposcopy. HPV genotyping and p16/ki67 expression may allow a better risk stratification than cytology. In Italy, recommendations on their use (alone or combined) in screening were developed by a multi-professional (nine scientific societies) and multidisciplinary working group (including patients and decision makers). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Data from large clinical trials on screening populations with long follow-up instructed the biomarkers' evaluation. The working group defined the CIN3+ risk thresholds (a surrogate marker of cancer risk) to guide decisions on management: immediate colposcopy, referral to 1-year and 3-year retesting. The risk-based approach allowed to reduce the number of possible strategies to be compared to five specific healthcare questions framed as PICOs. The prioritised outcomes were risk of cancer and of CIN3+ in HPV+/triage-negative women, number of colposcopies, number of samples to be taken, and number of unneeded treatments. The combination of morphological markers (cytology or p16/ki67) and extended HPV genotyping was the only strategy with a conditional recommendation in favour when compared with cytology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信