Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang
{"title":"食管癌根治术后吻合口瘘的处理策略及新方法的临床回顾。","authors":"Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang","doi":"10.21037/apm-25-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical practice review: management strategies and emerging approaches for anastomotic leakage following radical surgery for esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/apm-25-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-29\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
A clinical practice review: management strategies and emerging approaches for anastomotic leakage following radical surgery for esophageal cancer.
Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.