食管癌根治术后吻合口瘘的处理策略及新方法的临床回顾。

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang
{"title":"食管癌根治术后吻合口瘘的处理策略及新方法的临床回顾。","authors":"Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang","doi":"10.21037/apm-25-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical practice review: management strategies and emerging approaches for anastomotic leakage following radical surgery for esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Suchandrima Dutta, Sophie Chen, Xingyu He, Boyu Wang, Zhichao Wu, Waqas Ahmad, Wei Huang, Wa Du, Yanbo Fan, Jialiang Liang, Yigang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/apm-25-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-29\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根治性食管切除术仍然是食管癌根治性治疗的基石,但经常因术后事件而复杂化,最明显的是吻合口漏。吻合口漏发生率高达30%,是多因素的,显著增加了发病率和死亡率。本综述旨在总结当前的治疗策略,突出新兴疗法,并确定与该并发症相关的持续临床挑战。通过有针对性的文献检索,重点关注临床管理、治疗创新和与吻合口瘘相关的报道结果,并重点关注近期和高影响力的出版物,确定了相关研究。本文综述了目前吻合口瘘的检测、预防和管理策略,并评估了新兴的干预措施。通过对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)和食管造影进行早期诊断对于改善预后至关重要。保守措施,如广谱抗生素、营养支持和图像引导引流仍然是一线方法,而手术翻修和内镜技术,如支架置入术和真空治疗越来越多地用于复杂病例。新的治疗方法,包括组织工程构建和可生物降解支架,正在开发中,但缺乏大规模的临床验证。尽管取得了这些进展,但主要的临床挑战仍然存在,包括风险分层的预测工具有限,各机构治疗算法的可变性,以及新干预措施的长期疗效不明确。此外,大多数新策略都是由小队列研究或临床前数据支持的,限制了它们的直接临床应用。因此,改进多学科合作、标准化治疗方案和整合预测诊断对于优化结果至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于通过随机临床试验验证新兴疗法,并根据患者特定的风险因素和泄漏特征开发个性化管理算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A clinical practice review: management strategies and emerging approaches for anastomotic leakage following radical surgery for esophageal cancer.

Radical esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for esophageal cancer, but is frequently complicated by postoperative events, most notably anastomotic leakage. Anastomotic leakage, occurring in up to 30% of cases, is multifactorial in origin and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. This review aims to summarize current management strategies, highlight emerging therapies, and identify persistent clinical challenges related to this complication. Relevant studies were identified through targeted literature searches of articles focusing on clinical management, therapeutic innovation, and reported outcomes related to anastomotic leakage, with an emphasis on recent and high-impact publications. This review synthesizes current strategies for the detection, prevention, and management of anastomotic leakage and evaluates emerging interventions. Early diagnosis through contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and esophagography is critical for improving outcomes. Conservative measures such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, nutritional support, and image-guided drainage remain the first-line approach, while surgical revision and endoscopic techniques like stenting and vacuum therapy are increasingly employed in complex cases. Novel therapies, including tissue-engineered constructs and biodegradable stents, are under development but lack large-scale clinical validation. Despite these advancements, major clinical challenges persist, including limited predictive tools for risk stratification, variability in treatment algorithms across institutions, and unclear long-term efficacy of newer interventions. Furthermore, most novel strategies are supported by small cohort studies or preclinical data, limiting their immediate clinical application. Therefore, improved multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized treatment protocols, and integration of predictive diagnostics are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on validating emerging therapies through randomized clinical trials and developing personalized management algorithms based on patient-specific risk factors and leak characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信