在骨科感染专科的临床实践中口服与静脉注射抗生素的实施:一项描述性回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Robin Bawer, Anton A N Peterlin, Jakob Bak, Hans Gottlieb
{"title":"在骨科感染专科的临床实践中口服与静脉注射抗生素的实施:一项描述性回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Robin Bawer, Anton A N Peterlin, Jakob Bak, Hans Gottlieb","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.44571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics (OVIVA) trial demonstrated that oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy when used during the initial 6 weeks in the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, antibiotic treatment details, and complication rates following the implementation of the OVIVA protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> All patients treated for BJIs between September 2019 and September 2020 at the specialized orthopedic infection unit of Herlev Hospital were eligible for inclusion. This study included data on patient demographics, antibiotic regimens, type of infection, microbiology, length of stay, adverse drug reactions, and definite treatment failure at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A cohort of 129 patients was included. After a median of 7 days of intravenous therapy, 127 patients underwent an early switch to oral antibiotics. The most frequently used class of oral antibiotics was penicillins (68%). Adverse drug reactions, mostly gastrointestinal, occurred in 36% of all patients. Definite treatment failure at 1 year was 13% with oral antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We found a comparably low failure rate of 13% among patients who were able to transition to oral antibiotics when applying the treatment protocol from the OVIVA study.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"677-683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in clinical practice at a specialized orthopedic infection unit: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Bawer, Anton A N Peterlin, Jakob Bak, Hans Gottlieb\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.44571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics (OVIVA) trial demonstrated that oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy when used during the initial 6 weeks in the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, antibiotic treatment details, and complication rates following the implementation of the OVIVA protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> All patients treated for BJIs between September 2019 and September 2020 at the specialized orthopedic infection unit of Herlev Hospital were eligible for inclusion. This study included data on patient demographics, antibiotic regimens, type of infection, microbiology, length of stay, adverse drug reactions, and definite treatment failure at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A cohort of 129 patients was included. After a median of 7 days of intravenous therapy, 127 patients underwent an early switch to oral antibiotics. The most frequently used class of oral antibiotics was penicillins (68%). Adverse drug reactions, mostly gastrointestinal, occurred in 36% of all patients. Definite treatment failure at 1 year was 13% with oral antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We found a comparably low failure rate of 13% among patients who were able to transition to oral antibiotics when applying the treatment protocol from the OVIVA study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"677-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44571\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:口服与静脉注射抗生素(OVIVA)试验表明,在治疗骨和关节感染(BJIs)的最初6周内,口服抗生素治疗不逊色于静脉注射抗生素治疗。我们旨在评估实施OVIVA方案后的临床结果、抗生素治疗细节和并发症发生率。方法:所有于2019年9月至2020年9月在Herlev医院骨科感染专科病房接受BJIs治疗的患者均符合入选条件。该研究包括患者人口统计学、抗生素治疗方案、感染类型、微生物学、住院时间、药物不良反应和1年内明确治疗失败的数据。结果:纳入129例患者。在平均7天的静脉注射治疗后,127名患者接受了早期转向口服抗生素的治疗。最常用的一类口服抗生素是青霉素类(68%)。36%的患者发生了以胃肠道为主的药物不良反应。口服抗生素治疗1年的明确失败率为13%。结论:我们发现在使用OVIVA研究的治疗方案时,能够过渡到口服抗生素的患者的失败率相对较低,为13%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementation of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in clinical practice at a specialized orthopedic infection unit: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.

Implementation of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in clinical practice at a specialized orthopedic infection unit: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.

Background and purpose:  The Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics (OVIVA) trial demonstrated that oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy when used during the initial 6 weeks in the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, antibiotic treatment details, and complication rates following the implementation of the OVIVA protocol.

Methods:  All patients treated for BJIs between September 2019 and September 2020 at the specialized orthopedic infection unit of Herlev Hospital were eligible for inclusion. This study included data on patient demographics, antibiotic regimens, type of infection, microbiology, length of stay, adverse drug reactions, and definite treatment failure at 1 year.

Results:  A cohort of 129 patients was included. After a median of 7 days of intravenous therapy, 127 patients underwent an early switch to oral antibiotics. The most frequently used class of oral antibiotics was penicillins (68%). Adverse drug reactions, mostly gastrointestinal, occurred in 36% of all patients. Definite treatment failure at 1 year was 13% with oral antibiotics.

Conclusion:  We found a comparably low failure rate of 13% among patients who were able to transition to oral antibiotics when applying the treatment protocol from the OVIVA study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信