核磁共振引导下胶质母细胞瘤放疗降低钆剂量方案的可行性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Faisal Mahmood, Uffe Bernchou, Frederik Severin Gråe Harboe, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Anne Bisgaard, Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Bahar Celik, Elisabeth Kildegaard, Tine Schytte, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot
{"title":"核磁共振引导下胶质母细胞瘤放疗降低钆剂量方案的可行性。","authors":"Faisal Mahmood, Uffe Bernchou, Frederik Severin Gråe Harboe, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Anne Bisgaard, Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Bahar Celik, Elisabeth Kildegaard, Tine Schytte, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) enables precise tumour targeting through adaptive planning, which is particularly relevant for glioblastoma due to its dynamic morphology. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhance tumour visibility, but frequent use during MRIgRT raises safety concerns related to cumulative gadolinium exposure. This study investigated the feasibility of a reduced GBCA dose protocol for patients with glioblastoma undergoing MRIgRT, aiming to balance tumour conspicuity with minimisation of GBCA-related risks. Patient/material and methods: Nine patients with glioblastoma received hypo-fractionated MRI-Linac radiotherapy (10 × 3.4 Gy) with MRI performed with either full-dose, half-dose or no GBCA enhancement. Online gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation was performed by radiation oncologists, while offline GTV delineation was independently conducted by an expert neuroradiologist on GBCA-enhanced scans. Objective assessment using automatic thresholding and a structured Likert-scale evaluation were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During online adaptation, GTV volumes generally remained stable or increased, whereas offline expert assessments revealed a general volume reduction and systematic volume underestimation with half-dose scans (~18%). Relative delineation volume discrepancies were most pronounced in small tumours. Structured radiologist feedback reported lower confidence, tumour conspicuity and image quality in half-dose scans, particularly for small lesions. Otsu's thresholding revealed reduced edge definition with decreasing contrast dose. No signs of GBCA retention were observed between fractions.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Reduced-dose GBCA-protocols are feasible. Full-dose contrast is recommended at key fractions (e.g. baseline and mid-treatment) and for small tumours, with half-dose imaging reserved for selected intervals or larger tumours. This hybrid approach may balance safety and imaging precision in adaptive MRIgRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1185-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a reduced gadolinium dose protocol for MRI-guided radiotherapy in glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Faisal Mahmood, Uffe Bernchou, Frederik Severin Gråe Harboe, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Anne Bisgaard, Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Bahar Celik, Elisabeth Kildegaard, Tine Schytte, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) enables precise tumour targeting through adaptive planning, which is particularly relevant for glioblastoma due to its dynamic morphology. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhance tumour visibility, but frequent use during MRIgRT raises safety concerns related to cumulative gadolinium exposure. This study investigated the feasibility of a reduced GBCA dose protocol for patients with glioblastoma undergoing MRIgRT, aiming to balance tumour conspicuity with minimisation of GBCA-related risks. Patient/material and methods: Nine patients with glioblastoma received hypo-fractionated MRI-Linac radiotherapy (10 × 3.4 Gy) with MRI performed with either full-dose, half-dose or no GBCA enhancement. Online gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation was performed by radiation oncologists, while offline GTV delineation was independently conducted by an expert neuroradiologist on GBCA-enhanced scans. Objective assessment using automatic thresholding and a structured Likert-scale evaluation were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During online adaptation, GTV volumes generally remained stable or increased, whereas offline expert assessments revealed a general volume reduction and systematic volume underestimation with half-dose scans (~18%). Relative delineation volume discrepancies were most pronounced in small tumours. Structured radiologist feedback reported lower confidence, tumour conspicuity and image quality in half-dose scans, particularly for small lesions. Otsu's thresholding revealed reduced edge definition with decreasing contrast dose. No signs of GBCA retention were observed between fractions.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Reduced-dose GBCA-protocols are feasible. Full-dose contrast is recommended at key fractions (e.g. baseline and mid-treatment) and for small tumours, with half-dose imaging reserved for selected intervals or larger tumours. This hybrid approach may balance safety and imaging precision in adaptive MRIgRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"1185-1193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439311/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:磁共振成像引导放射治疗(MRIgRT)通过适应性规划实现精确的肿瘤靶向,由于胶质母细胞瘤的动态形态,这对其特别重要。钆基造影剂(gbca)增强肿瘤可见性,但在MRIgRT期间频繁使用会引起与累积钆暴露相关的安全性问题。本研究探讨了减少胶质母细胞瘤患者行MRIgRT的GBCA剂量方案的可行性,旨在平衡肿瘤的显著性与GBCA相关风险的最小化。患者/材料和方法:9例胶质母细胞瘤患者接受低分级MRI- linac放疗(10 × 3.4 Gy), MRI分别为全剂量、半剂量或无GBCA增强。在线肿瘤总体积(GTV)划定由放射肿瘤学家完成,而离线GTV划定由神经放射学专家在gbca增强扫描上独立进行。采用自动阈值法和结构化李克特量表进行客观评估。结果:在在线适应期间,GTV体积通常保持稳定或增加,而离线专家评估显示,在半剂量扫描时,GTV体积普遍减少,系统体积低估(~18%)。相对圈定体积差异在小肿瘤中最为明显。结构化放射科医生反馈说,在半剂量扫描中,尤其是对小病变,信任度较低,肿瘤显著性和图像质量较差。Otsu阈值显示,随着造影剂剂量的降低,边缘清晰度降低。在分数之间没有观察到GBCA保留的迹象。解释:低剂量gbca方案是可行的。建议在关键阶段(如基线和治疗中期)和小肿瘤进行全剂量造影剂,对选定间隔或较大肿瘤保留半剂量造影剂。这种混合方法可以平衡自适应MRIgRT的安全性和成像精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility of a reduced gadolinium dose protocol for MRI-guided radiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Feasibility of a reduced gadolinium dose protocol for MRI-guided radiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Feasibility of a reduced gadolinium dose protocol for MRI-guided radiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Feasibility of a reduced gadolinium dose protocol for MRI-guided radiotherapy in glioblastoma.

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) enables precise tumour targeting through adaptive planning, which is particularly relevant for glioblastoma due to its dynamic morphology. Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhance tumour visibility, but frequent use during MRIgRT raises safety concerns related to cumulative gadolinium exposure. This study investigated the feasibility of a reduced GBCA dose protocol for patients with glioblastoma undergoing MRIgRT, aiming to balance tumour conspicuity with minimisation of GBCA-related risks. Patient/material and methods: Nine patients with glioblastoma received hypo-fractionated MRI-Linac radiotherapy (10 × 3.4 Gy) with MRI performed with either full-dose, half-dose or no GBCA enhancement. Online gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation was performed by radiation oncologists, while offline GTV delineation was independently conducted by an expert neuroradiologist on GBCA-enhanced scans. Objective assessment using automatic thresholding and a structured Likert-scale evaluation were also performed.

Results: During online adaptation, GTV volumes generally remained stable or increased, whereas offline expert assessments revealed a general volume reduction and systematic volume underestimation with half-dose scans (~18%). Relative delineation volume discrepancies were most pronounced in small tumours. Structured radiologist feedback reported lower confidence, tumour conspicuity and image quality in half-dose scans, particularly for small lesions. Otsu's thresholding revealed reduced edge definition with decreasing contrast dose. No signs of GBCA retention were observed between fractions.

Interpretation: Reduced-dose GBCA-protocols are feasible. Full-dose contrast is recommended at key fractions (e.g. baseline and mid-treatment) and for small tumours, with half-dose imaging reserved for selected intervals or larger tumours. This hybrid approach may balance safety and imaging precision in adaptive MRIgRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信