根据2025年ICN定义对护理的价值论(重新)评价:对博士教育研究发展的影响。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jerome Visperas Cleofas
{"title":"根据2025年ICN定义对护理的价值论(重新)评价:对博士教育研究发展的影响。","authors":"Jerome Visperas Cleofas","doi":"10.1111/jan.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo explore the potential axiological shift in nursing, drawing upon a critical reading of the new definition of 'nursing' published by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) in June 2025, and to articulate its implications for research and doctoral education.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nCritical discussion paper.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nGuided by critical inquiry and emancipatory nursing knowledge development approaches, this paper deploys retroductive analysis to interrogate the axiological commitments that inform and are generated by the 2025 ICN definition and how it relates to nursing research. Consequently, it utilises the Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) to map strategies for doctoral programmes responding to this axiological shift.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA comprehensive axiological analysis of the 2025 ICN definition reveals a shift towards valuing human rights, relationality and care, planetary health and transformative leadership. However, an axiological analysis of prevailing nursing research definitions indicates a gap, particularly an explicit commitment to these expanded values beyond upholding scientific rigour. In response, an Axiologically-Driven Research Development Strategy Framework (ADRDSF) is proposed, integrating ICN's new axiologies across doctoral programmes in nursing.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING\r\nThis axiological shift signals the reorientation of nursing research to be explicitly value-driven, ethical and focused on social justice, relationality and planetary health. Doctoral programmes must cultivate scholars and leaders who are not only competent but also axiologically aligned, capable of driving this transformative research agenda for a more just and sustainable future.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Axiological (Re)Appraisal of Nursing in the Light of the 2025 ICN Definition: Implications for Research Development in Doctoral Education.\",\"authors\":\"Jerome Visperas Cleofas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\r\\nTo explore the potential axiological shift in nursing, drawing upon a critical reading of the new definition of 'nursing' published by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) in June 2025, and to articulate its implications for research and doctoral education.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nCritical discussion paper.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nGuided by critical inquiry and emancipatory nursing knowledge development approaches, this paper deploys retroductive analysis to interrogate the axiological commitments that inform and are generated by the 2025 ICN definition and how it relates to nursing research. Consequently, it utilises the Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) to map strategies for doctoral programmes responding to this axiological shift.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA comprehensive axiological analysis of the 2025 ICN definition reveals a shift towards valuing human rights, relationality and care, planetary health and transformative leadership. However, an axiological analysis of prevailing nursing research definitions indicates a gap, particularly an explicit commitment to these expanded values beyond upholding scientific rigour. In response, an Axiologically-Driven Research Development Strategy Framework (ADRDSF) is proposed, integrating ICN's new axiologies across doctoral programmes in nursing.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING\\r\\nThis axiological shift signals the reorientation of nursing research to be explicitly value-driven, ethical and focused on social justice, relationality and planetary health. Doctoral programmes must cultivate scholars and leaders who are not only competent but also axiologically aligned, capable of driving this transformative research agenda for a more just and sustainable future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过对国际护士理事会(ICN)于2025年6月发布的“护理”新定义的批判性解读,探索护理领域潜在的价值论转变,并阐明其对研究和博士教育的影响。DESIGNCritical讨论文件。方法:在批判性调查和解放式护理知识发展方法的指导下,本文采用回溯分析来询问2025年ICN定义所产生的价值承诺,以及它与护理研究的关系。因此,它利用Vitae研究员发展框架(RDF)来映射应对这种价值论转变的博士课程策略。结果:对2025年《国际健康宣言》定义的全面价值论分析显示,该宣言已转向重视人权、关系与关怀、地球健康和变革型领导。然而,对主流护理研究定义的价值论分析表明存在差距,特别是对这些扩展值的明确承诺超出了坚持科学严谨性。作为回应,提出了一个价值论驱动的研究发展战略框架(ADRDSF),将ICN的新价值论整合到护理学博士课程中。对护理的影响这种价值论的转变标志着护理研究的重新定位,明确地以价值为导向,以道德为导向,并关注社会正义,关系和地球健康。博士课程必须培养学者和领导者,他们不仅有能力,而且在价值论上是一致的,能够推动这一变革性的研究议程,以实现更公正和可持续的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Axiological (Re)Appraisal of Nursing in the Light of the 2025 ICN Definition: Implications for Research Development in Doctoral Education.
AIM To explore the potential axiological shift in nursing, drawing upon a critical reading of the new definition of 'nursing' published by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) in June 2025, and to articulate its implications for research and doctoral education. DESIGN Critical discussion paper. METHODS Guided by critical inquiry and emancipatory nursing knowledge development approaches, this paper deploys retroductive analysis to interrogate the axiological commitments that inform and are generated by the 2025 ICN definition and how it relates to nursing research. Consequently, it utilises the Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) to map strategies for doctoral programmes responding to this axiological shift. RESULTS A comprehensive axiological analysis of the 2025 ICN definition reveals a shift towards valuing human rights, relationality and care, planetary health and transformative leadership. However, an axiological analysis of prevailing nursing research definitions indicates a gap, particularly an explicit commitment to these expanded values beyond upholding scientific rigour. In response, an Axiologically-Driven Research Development Strategy Framework (ADRDSF) is proposed, integrating ICN's new axiologies across doctoral programmes in nursing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING This axiological shift signals the reorientation of nursing research to be explicitly value-driven, ethical and focused on social justice, relationality and planetary health. Doctoral programmes must cultivate scholars and leaders who are not only competent but also axiologically aligned, capable of driving this transformative research agenda for a more just and sustainable future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信