离开学术界:双重职业关系和伴侣在学术生涯中的流失。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26884844251366373
Jill A Fisher, Yu Tao, Margaret Waltz, Torin Monahan
{"title":"离开学术界:双重职业关系和伴侣在学术生涯中的流失。","authors":"Jill A Fisher, Yu Tao, Margaret Waltz, Torin Monahan","doi":"10.1177/26884844251366373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than one third of academics are coupled with another academic, with more women being in such dual-career relationships. Little is known about how these couples' experiences affect their attrition from or persistence in academia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed survey data of academics at 100 U.S. colleges and universities to answer two research questions: (1) Among all academic partners, who are the most likely to abandon their desired academic careers in terms of their gender, race, and field? (2) What effects does leaving academia have on those partners' career outcomes?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 22% of aspiring academics in academic relationships leave that career pathway. One third leave for personal reasons, including to prioritize their partner's career. When partners leave academia for personal reasons, they are less likely to be employed in any job and, when employed, are paid less than their counterparts who leave academia for professional reasons. Among our results, we found notable gender differences. Compared with men, women in medicine were more likely to leave academia for personal reasons. Moreover, the earnings of women who leave academia due to personal reasons are the most negatively impacted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These trends indicate that the choices made by dual-career couples in response to the academic job market and to universities' policies for partner hiring have substantial effects on the demographic makeup of academic research and scholarship. By supporting the needs of academic couples, universities have the opportunity to make their own institutions more diverse and to patch a hole in the leaky pipeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"752-762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaving Academia: Dual-Career Relationships and Partners' Attrition from Academic Careers.\",\"authors\":\"Jill A Fisher, Yu Tao, Margaret Waltz, Torin Monahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26884844251366373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than one third of academics are coupled with another academic, with more women being in such dual-career relationships. Little is known about how these couples' experiences affect their attrition from or persistence in academia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed survey data of academics at 100 U.S. colleges and universities to answer two research questions: (1) Among all academic partners, who are the most likely to abandon their desired academic careers in terms of their gender, race, and field? (2) What effects does leaving academia have on those partners' career outcomes?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 22% of aspiring academics in academic relationships leave that career pathway. One third leave for personal reasons, including to prioritize their partner's career. When partners leave academia for personal reasons, they are less likely to be employed in any job and, when employed, are paid less than their counterparts who leave academia for professional reasons. Among our results, we found notable gender differences. Compared with men, women in medicine were more likely to leave academia for personal reasons. Moreover, the earnings of women who leave academia due to personal reasons are the most negatively impacted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These trends indicate that the choices made by dual-career couples in response to the academic job market and to universities' policies for partner hiring have substantial effects on the demographic makeup of academic research and scholarship. By supporting the needs of academic couples, universities have the opportunity to make their own institutions more diverse and to patch a hole in the leaky pipeline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"752-762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844251366373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844251366373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超过三分之一的学者与另一名学者结合,更多的女性处于这种双重职业关系中。对于这些夫妇的经历是如何影响他们从学术界流失或坚持下去的,我们知之甚少。方法:我们分析了美国100所高校学者的调查数据,回答了两个研究问题:(1)在所有学术合作伙伴中,从性别、种族和领域来看,谁最有可能放弃自己想要的学术职业?(2)离开学术界对合作伙伴的职业发展有什么影响?结果:我们发现22%的有抱负的学者在学术关系中离开了这条职业道路。三分之一的人休假是出于个人原因,包括优先考虑伴侣的事业。当伴侣因个人原因离开学术界时,他们被雇用的可能性更小,即使被雇用,也比因职业原因离开学术界的伴侣得到的报酬更低。在我们的研究结果中,我们发现了显著的性别差异。与男性相比,医学领域的女性更有可能因个人原因离开学术界。此外,由于个人原因离开学术界的女性的收入受到的负面影响最大。结论:这些趋势表明,双职工夫妇为应对学术就业市场和大学伴侣招聘政策而做出的选择对学术研究和奖学金的人口构成产生了实质性影响。通过支持学术伴侣的需求,大学有机会使自己的机构更加多样化,并在漏水的管道上修补一个洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leaving Academia: Dual-Career Relationships and Partners' Attrition from Academic Careers.

Leaving Academia: Dual-Career Relationships and Partners' Attrition from Academic Careers.

Leaving Academia: Dual-Career Relationships and Partners' Attrition from Academic Careers.

Leaving Academia: Dual-Career Relationships and Partners' Attrition from Academic Careers.

Background: More than one third of academics are coupled with another academic, with more women being in such dual-career relationships. Little is known about how these couples' experiences affect their attrition from or persistence in academia.

Methods: We analyzed survey data of academics at 100 U.S. colleges and universities to answer two research questions: (1) Among all academic partners, who are the most likely to abandon their desired academic careers in terms of their gender, race, and field? (2) What effects does leaving academia have on those partners' career outcomes?

Results: We found that 22% of aspiring academics in academic relationships leave that career pathway. One third leave for personal reasons, including to prioritize their partner's career. When partners leave academia for personal reasons, they are less likely to be employed in any job and, when employed, are paid less than their counterparts who leave academia for professional reasons. Among our results, we found notable gender differences. Compared with men, women in medicine were more likely to leave academia for personal reasons. Moreover, the earnings of women who leave academia due to personal reasons are the most negatively impacted.

Conclusions: These trends indicate that the choices made by dual-career couples in response to the academic job market and to universities' policies for partner hiring have substantial effects on the demographic makeup of academic research and scholarship. By supporting the needs of academic couples, universities have the opportunity to make their own institutions more diverse and to patch a hole in the leaky pipeline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信