微创透析准入的影响。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ngoh C Liew, Sarah Chew, Pei Ho, John Swinnen, Robert Shahverdyan, Shannon D Thomas
{"title":"微创透析准入的影响。","authors":"Ngoh C Liew, Sarah Chew, Pei Ho, John Swinnen, Robert Shahverdyan, Shannon D Thomas","doi":"10.1177/11297298251371764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimal Invasive Dialysis Access (MIDA) for renal dialysis encompasses percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation and the modified percutaneous Seldinger peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions (pPD). This review examines the impact of MIDA on technical success, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was made of the literature on MIDA including pAVF creation and pPD insertion regarding technical success rates, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost. Additional benefits of pAVF such as expansion of cannulation area and reduction of steal syndrome, and associated administrative challenges was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percutaneous AVF can be performed outside the operating room by interventionalists and physicians of several specialties. Initial reports claim safe and efficacious use and equivalent patency to open surgery (sAVF). Percutaneous AVF with multiple venous outflows has the benefit of expanding the area for cannulation. The incidence of wound infection and steal syndrome is reduced. Most studies have been retrospective and there are no prospective randomized controlled trials. The cost-effectiveness of pAVF versus sAVF has been challenged. The recently modified pPD has reduced incidence of catheter misplacement with improved catheter survival. With equivalent efficacy and complication rates reported in prospective studies and without the need for surgery and general anesthesia, pPD should be cost-effective in skilled centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIDA is an innovative approach to dialysis access that offers benefits over open surgery. MIDA advantages include widened indications to the very sick patients, being performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance with local anesthesia. New devices are being developed that may meet stricter criteria with improved efficacy. The cost of device and added procedures required for maturation and patency may prevent widespread application for now. Real-world data is needed to determine long term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Additional skills training and team collaborations are likely key factors for success.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251371764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of minimally invasive dialysis access.\",\"authors\":\"Ngoh C Liew, Sarah Chew, Pei Ho, John Swinnen, Robert Shahverdyan, Shannon D Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251371764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimal Invasive Dialysis Access (MIDA) for renal dialysis encompasses percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation and the modified percutaneous Seldinger peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions (pPD). This review examines the impact of MIDA on technical success, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was made of the literature on MIDA including pAVF creation and pPD insertion regarding technical success rates, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost. Additional benefits of pAVF such as expansion of cannulation area and reduction of steal syndrome, and associated administrative challenges was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percutaneous AVF can be performed outside the operating room by interventionalists and physicians of several specialties. Initial reports claim safe and efficacious use and equivalent patency to open surgery (sAVF). Percutaneous AVF with multiple venous outflows has the benefit of expanding the area for cannulation. The incidence of wound infection and steal syndrome is reduced. Most studies have been retrospective and there are no prospective randomized controlled trials. The cost-effectiveness of pAVF versus sAVF has been challenged. The recently modified pPD has reduced incidence of catheter misplacement with improved catheter survival. With equivalent efficacy and complication rates reported in prospective studies and without the need for surgery and general anesthesia, pPD should be cost-effective in skilled centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIDA is an innovative approach to dialysis access that offers benefits over open surgery. MIDA advantages include widened indications to the very sick patients, being performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance with local anesthesia. New devices are being developed that may meet stricter criteria with improved efficacy. The cost of device and added procedures required for maturation and patency may prevent widespread application for now. Real-world data is needed to determine long term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Additional skills training and team collaborations are likely key factors for success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251371764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251371764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251371764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肾透析的微创透析通路(MIDA)包括经皮动静脉瘘(pAVF)的创建和改良的经皮Seldinger腹膜透析导管插入(pPD)。这篇综述探讨了MIDA对技术成功、成熟率、通畅、临床获益、并发症和成本的影响。方法:从技术成功率、成熟率、通畅度、临床获益、并发症和成本等方面对包括pAVF生成和pPD插入在内的MIDA相关文献进行综述。评估了pAVF的其他益处,如扩大插管面积和减少偷窃综合征,以及相关的管理挑战。结果:介入医师及多专科医师均可在手术室外进行经皮静脉动静脉瘘。最初的报告声称安全有效的使用和开放手术(sAVF)的同等通畅。经皮AVF多静脉流出有利于扩大插管面积。减少了伤口感染和偷窃综合征的发生率。大多数研究都是回顾性的,没有前瞻性随机对照试验。与sAVF相比,pAVF的成本效益受到了挑战。最近改良的pPD降低了导管错位的发生率,提高了导管的存活率。在前瞻性研究中,pPD的疗效和并发症发生率相当,而且不需要手术和全身麻醉,因此在技术熟练的中心,pPD应该是具有成本效益的。结论:MIDA是一种创新的透析途径,比开放手术更有优势。MIDA的优点包括扩大了重症患者的适应症,在超声和透视引导下局部麻醉。正在开发的新设备可能满足更严格的标准,并提高疗效。设备的成本和成熟和专利所需的附加程序可能会阻止目前的广泛应用。需要真实世界的数据来确定长期临床结果和成本效益。额外的技能培训和团队协作可能是成功的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of minimally invasive dialysis access.

Objective: Minimal Invasive Dialysis Access (MIDA) for renal dialysis encompasses percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation and the modified percutaneous Seldinger peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions (pPD). This review examines the impact of MIDA on technical success, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost.

Methods: A review was made of the literature on MIDA including pAVF creation and pPD insertion regarding technical success rates, maturation rates, patency, clinical benefits, complications, and cost. Additional benefits of pAVF such as expansion of cannulation area and reduction of steal syndrome, and associated administrative challenges was assessed.

Results: Percutaneous AVF can be performed outside the operating room by interventionalists and physicians of several specialties. Initial reports claim safe and efficacious use and equivalent patency to open surgery (sAVF). Percutaneous AVF with multiple venous outflows has the benefit of expanding the area for cannulation. The incidence of wound infection and steal syndrome is reduced. Most studies have been retrospective and there are no prospective randomized controlled trials. The cost-effectiveness of pAVF versus sAVF has been challenged. The recently modified pPD has reduced incidence of catheter misplacement with improved catheter survival. With equivalent efficacy and complication rates reported in prospective studies and without the need for surgery and general anesthesia, pPD should be cost-effective in skilled centers.

Conclusions: MIDA is an innovative approach to dialysis access that offers benefits over open surgery. MIDA advantages include widened indications to the very sick patients, being performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance with local anesthesia. New devices are being developed that may meet stricter criteria with improved efficacy. The cost of device and added procedures required for maturation and patency may prevent widespread application for now. Real-world data is needed to determine long term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Additional skills training and team collaborations are likely key factors for success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信