George Pro, Corey Hayes, Mofan Gu, Roberto Bravo, Jure Baloh
{"title":"地理和政策因素影响物质使用障碍治疗的远程医疗可用性。","authors":"George Pro, Corey Hayes, Mofan Gu, Roberto Bravo, Jure Baloh","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09966-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telehealth is increasingly a standard and routine clinical option, indicating a changing outlook for SUD treatment from in-person to the more convenient option of telehealth. As populations across geographies increasingly prefer telehealth, more research is warranted that focuses on how where a person lives is associated with telehealth availability. The authors used the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository (MATTR 2024) to identify telehealth availability among all known licensed SUD treatment facilities in the USA (N = 10,492 facilities). The authors merged external geocoded data to MATTR to characterize the communities and spaces immediately surrounding each facility, including social vulnerability indices (census tract), population demographics (county), and state-level telehealth policies. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression was used to model telehealth availability. Roughly 4 out of 5 treatment facilities (81%) offered telehealth. At the census tract level, for every additional point on the racial/ethnic minority status vulnerability scale, the odds of a facility offering telehealth decreased by 4% (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02). Compared to states with substantial legal barriers about starting telehealth by any mode, facilities in states with stronger, innovation-ready laws had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.92, p < 0.01). Similarly, facilities in states that minimize barriers to allowing nurses to practice and use telehealth independently had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.09-1.84, p < 0.01). State-level health policies impact access to SUD care in a multitude of ways, and new policies that promote telehealth by minimizing barriers to service delivery will benefit people in need of SUD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic and Policy Factors Influence Telehealth Availability for Substance Use Disorder Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"George Pro, Corey Hayes, Mofan Gu, Roberto Bravo, Jure Baloh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-025-09966-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Telehealth is increasingly a standard and routine clinical option, indicating a changing outlook for SUD treatment from in-person to the more convenient option of telehealth. As populations across geographies increasingly prefer telehealth, more research is warranted that focuses on how where a person lives is associated with telehealth availability. The authors used the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository (MATTR 2024) to identify telehealth availability among all known licensed SUD treatment facilities in the USA (N = 10,492 facilities). The authors merged external geocoded data to MATTR to characterize the communities and spaces immediately surrounding each facility, including social vulnerability indices (census tract), population demographics (county), and state-level telehealth policies. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression was used to model telehealth availability. Roughly 4 out of 5 treatment facilities (81%) offered telehealth. At the census tract level, for every additional point on the racial/ethnic minority status vulnerability scale, the odds of a facility offering telehealth decreased by 4% (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02). Compared to states with substantial legal barriers about starting telehealth by any mode, facilities in states with stronger, innovation-ready laws had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.92, p < 0.01). Similarly, facilities in states that minimize barriers to allowing nurses to practice and use telehealth independently had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.09-1.84, p < 0.01). State-level health policies impact access to SUD care in a multitude of ways, and new policies that promote telehealth by minimizing barriers to service delivery will benefit people in need of SUD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09966-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09966-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
远程医疗越来越成为一种标准和常规的临床选择,这表明SUD治疗的前景正在发生变化,从面对面到更方便的远程医疗选择。随着各地区的人口越来越喜欢远程医疗,有必要开展更多的研究,重点关注一个人的居住地与远程医疗的可用性之间的关系。作者使用心理健康和成瘾治疗跟踪存储库(matr 2024)来确定美国所有已知许可的SUD治疗设施(N = 10,492个设施)的远程医疗可用性。作者将外部地理编码数据合并到matr中,以表征每个设施周围的社区和空间,包括社会脆弱性指数(人口普查区)、人口统计数据(县)和州级远程医疗政策。采用多水平多变量logistic回归对远程医疗可获得性进行建模。大约五分之四的治疗机构(81%)提供远程保健。在人口普查区一级,种族/少数民族地位脆弱性量表上每增加一点,提供远程保健的设施的几率就降低4% (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02)。与在以任何方式开展远程医疗方面存在实质性法律障碍的州相比,在具有更强的创新准备法律的州,设施提供远程医疗的几率更高(aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.92, p
Geographic and Policy Factors Influence Telehealth Availability for Substance Use Disorder Treatment.
Telehealth is increasingly a standard and routine clinical option, indicating a changing outlook for SUD treatment from in-person to the more convenient option of telehealth. As populations across geographies increasingly prefer telehealth, more research is warranted that focuses on how where a person lives is associated with telehealth availability. The authors used the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository (MATTR 2024) to identify telehealth availability among all known licensed SUD treatment facilities in the USA (N = 10,492 facilities). The authors merged external geocoded data to MATTR to characterize the communities and spaces immediately surrounding each facility, including social vulnerability indices (census tract), population demographics (county), and state-level telehealth policies. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression was used to model telehealth availability. Roughly 4 out of 5 treatment facilities (81%) offered telehealth. At the census tract level, for every additional point on the racial/ethnic minority status vulnerability scale, the odds of a facility offering telehealth decreased by 4% (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02). Compared to states with substantial legal barriers about starting telehealth by any mode, facilities in states with stronger, innovation-ready laws had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.13-1.92, p < 0.01). Similarly, facilities in states that minimize barriers to allowing nurses to practice and use telehealth independently had higher odds of offering telehealth (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.09-1.84, p < 0.01). State-level health policies impact access to SUD care in a multitude of ways, and new policies that promote telehealth by minimizing barriers to service delivery will benefit people in need of SUD treatment.
期刊介绍:
This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews.
This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.