竖脊平面阻滞用于腹腔镜活体肾切除术术后镇痛。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
Bora Dinc, Ilker Onguc Aycan, Ali Avanaz, Nihal Kiraz, Abdullah Kisaoglu, Necmiye Hadimioglu, Zeki Ertug, Ismail Demiryilmaz
{"title":"竖脊平面阻滞用于腹腔镜活体肾切除术术后镇痛。","authors":"Bora Dinc, Ilker Onguc Aycan, Ali Avanaz, Nihal Kiraz, Abdullah Kisaoglu, Necmiye Hadimioglu, Zeki Ertug, Ismail Demiryilmaz","doi":"10.6002/ect.2022.0401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative donor care is being improved with newly applied methods. Recently, because of its effectiveness, erector spinae plane blocks have been increasing in popularity. However, its use for laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy is not fully known. We evaluated the effectiveness of erector spinae plane blocks in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on postoperative pain and total analgesia consumption in the first 24 hours postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized, prospective cohort efficiency study, we included 60 donors scheduled for elective nephrectomy. The control group (n = 30) received analgesic medication according to organ transplant ward protocol for postoperative pain treatment; the erector spinae plane block group (n = 30) underwent an erector spinae plane block application with routine analgesic medication practice. We evaluated the efficacy of postoperative pain treatment and total analgesic consumption at postoperative 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 60 donors in the study, there were no differences in the verbal numerical rating scale and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale scores between the groups in the first 24 hours. However, total tramadol consumption in the erector spinae plane block group was less (P = .003) than in the control group. Regression analysis confirmed that block application was associated with tramadol consumption (P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although erector spinae plane blocks applied under bilateral ultrasonographic guidance did not have any efficacy for pain relief in the first 24 hours postoperation, a decrease was found in analgesic consumption compared with the nonblock group.</p>","PeriodicalId":50467,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","volume":"23 8","pages":"523-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Bora Dinc, Ilker Onguc Aycan, Ali Avanaz, Nihal Kiraz, Abdullah Kisaoglu, Necmiye Hadimioglu, Zeki Ertug, Ismail Demiryilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.6002/ect.2022.0401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative donor care is being improved with newly applied methods. Recently, because of its effectiveness, erector spinae plane blocks have been increasing in popularity. However, its use for laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy is not fully known. We evaluated the effectiveness of erector spinae plane blocks in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on postoperative pain and total analgesia consumption in the first 24 hours postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized, prospective cohort efficiency study, we included 60 donors scheduled for elective nephrectomy. The control group (n = 30) received analgesic medication according to organ transplant ward protocol for postoperative pain treatment; the erector spinae plane block group (n = 30) underwent an erector spinae plane block application with routine analgesic medication practice. We evaluated the efficacy of postoperative pain treatment and total analgesic consumption at postoperative 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 60 donors in the study, there were no differences in the verbal numerical rating scale and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale scores between the groups in the first 24 hours. However, total tramadol consumption in the erector spinae plane block group was less (P = .003) than in the control group. Regression analysis confirmed that block application was associated with tramadol consumption (P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although erector spinae plane blocks applied under bilateral ultrasonographic guidance did not have any efficacy for pain relief in the first 24 hours postoperation, a decrease was found in analgesic consumption compared with the nonblock group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"523-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2022.0401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2022.0401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用新方法改善术后供体护理。最近,由于它的有效性,直立脊柱平面块越来越受欢迎。然而,它在腹腔镜活体供体肾切除术中的应用尚不完全清楚。我们评估了腹腔镜活体供肾切除术中竖脊平面阻滞对术后疼痛和术后24小时总镇痛消耗的影响。材料和方法:在这项随机、前瞻性队列效率研究中,我们纳入了60名计划择期肾切除术的供者。对照组30例,按器官移植病房术后疼痛治疗方案给予镇痛药物治疗;竖脊肌平面阻滞组(n = 30)应用竖脊肌平面阻滞配合常规镇痛药物治疗。我们在术后1、6、12和24小时评估了术后疼痛治疗的疗效和总镇痛用量。结果:在60例供体中,两组在24小时内的言语数值评定量表和Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表得分均无差异。然而,竖脊肌平面阻滞组曲马多总消耗量低于对照组(P = 0.003)。回归分析证实阻滞用药与曲马多用量相关(P = .001)。结论:虽然双侧超声引导下应用竖脊平面阻滞对术后24小时疼痛无缓解作用,但与未阻滞组相比,镇痛用量有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy.

Objectives: Postoperative donor care is being improved with newly applied methods. Recently, because of its effectiveness, erector spinae plane blocks have been increasing in popularity. However, its use for laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy is not fully known. We evaluated the effectiveness of erector spinae plane blocks in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on postoperative pain and total analgesia consumption in the first 24 hours postsurgery.

Materials and methods: In this randomized, prospective cohort efficiency study, we included 60 donors scheduled for elective nephrectomy. The control group (n = 30) received analgesic medication according to organ transplant ward protocol for postoperative pain treatment; the erector spinae plane block group (n = 30) underwent an erector spinae plane block application with routine analgesic medication practice. We evaluated the efficacy of postoperative pain treatment and total analgesic consumption at postoperative 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours.

Results: Among the 60 donors in the study, there were no differences in the verbal numerical rating scale and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale scores between the groups in the first 24 hours. However, total tramadol consumption in the erector spinae plane block group was less (P = .003) than in the control group. Regression analysis confirmed that block application was associated with tramadol consumption (P = .001).

Conclusions: Although erector spinae plane blocks applied under bilateral ultrasonographic guidance did not have any efficacy for pain relief in the first 24 hours postoperation, a decrease was found in analgesic consumption compared with the nonblock group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal includes the following: Surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties; Immunobiology and immunosuppression; Clinical results; Complications; Infection; Malignancies; Organ donation; Organ and tissue procurement and preservation; Sociological and ethical issues; Xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信