神经性疼痛的管理:意大利疼痛研究协会的调查。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Salvatore Sardo, Maria C Pace, Caterina Aurilio, Stefano Tamburin, Filomena Puntillo, Enrico Polati, Vittorio Schweiger, Mario Musu, Giustino Varrassi, Chiara Corno, Domenico Tiso, Diego M Fornasari, Gabriele Finco
{"title":"神经性疼痛的管理:意大利疼痛研究协会的调查。","authors":"Salvatore Sardo, Maria C Pace, Caterina Aurilio, Stefano Tamburin, Filomena Puntillo, Enrico Polati, Vittorio Schweiger, Mario Musu, Giustino Varrassi, Chiara Corno, Domenico Tiso, Diego M Fornasari, Gabriele Finco","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19094-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuropathic pain significantly impacts the quality of life. This study explores neuropathic pain management practices among members of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain (AISD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 46<sup>th</sup> National Congress, 240 physicians affiliated with AISD were surveyed. The data included demographics, clinical settings, diagnostic procedures, treatment approaches, and preferences. The analysis utilized descriptive statistics, treatment rankings, and consensus evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents practicing in pain medicine reported the numbers of cases managed monthly. Neuropathic pain diagnoses relied on clinical findings corroborated by diagnostic tools. Treatment typically commenced within one to two weeks, emphasizing pharmacological interventions, which were often combined with invasive procedures. The leading pharmacological choices included gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Varied rankings were noted for invasive procedures, with nerve and neuraxial blocks particularly favored. Nutraceuticals such as palmitoylethanolamide, alpha-lipoic acid, and vitamin B complex were commonly prescribed, reflecting differences based on the physician's age and specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, practices aligned with guidelines, showing a strong consensus on specific pharmacological treatments. Discrepancies in the rankings of invasive procedures, particularly among specialists, have led to questions regarding their perceived efficacy. These inconsistencies may indicate varying levels of expertise in interventional management, differences in the availability of these techniques, or different views on the current evidence supporting these procedures. The use of nutraceuticals indicated potential gaps in the guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of neuropathic pain: a survey of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Sardo, Maria C Pace, Caterina Aurilio, Stefano Tamburin, Filomena Puntillo, Enrico Polati, Vittorio Schweiger, Mario Musu, Giustino Varrassi, Chiara Corno, Domenico Tiso, Diego M Fornasari, Gabriele Finco\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19094-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuropathic pain significantly impacts the quality of life. This study explores neuropathic pain management practices among members of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain (AISD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 46<sup>th</sup> National Congress, 240 physicians affiliated with AISD were surveyed. The data included demographics, clinical settings, diagnostic procedures, treatment approaches, and preferences. The analysis utilized descriptive statistics, treatment rankings, and consensus evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents practicing in pain medicine reported the numbers of cases managed monthly. Neuropathic pain diagnoses relied on clinical findings corroborated by diagnostic tools. Treatment typically commenced within one to two weeks, emphasizing pharmacological interventions, which were often combined with invasive procedures. The leading pharmacological choices included gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Varied rankings were noted for invasive procedures, with nerve and neuraxial blocks particularly favored. Nutraceuticals such as palmitoylethanolamide, alpha-lipoic acid, and vitamin B complex were commonly prescribed, reflecting differences based on the physician's age and specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, practices aligned with guidelines, showing a strong consensus on specific pharmacological treatments. Discrepancies in the rankings of invasive procedures, particularly among specialists, have led to questions regarding their perceived efficacy. These inconsistencies may indicate varying levels of expertise in interventional management, differences in the availability of these techniques, or different views on the current evidence supporting these procedures. The use of nutraceuticals indicated potential gaps in the guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19094-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19094-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经性疼痛显著影响生活质量。本研究探讨了意大利疼痛研究协会(AISD)成员之间的神经性疼痛管理实践。方法:在第46届全国代表大会期间,对240名AISD附属医师进行调查。数据包括人口统计、临床环境、诊断程序、治疗方法和偏好。分析采用描述性统计、治疗排名和共识评价。结果:从事疼痛医学的受访者每月报告的病例数。神经性疼痛的诊断依赖于诊断工具证实的临床结果。治疗通常在一到两周内开始,强调药物干预,通常与侵入性手术相结合。主要的药理学选择包括加巴喷丁类、三环抗抑郁药和5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂。侵入性手术的排名各不相同,神经和神经轴阻滞尤其受欢迎。通常开的是棕榈酰乙醇酰胺、α -硫辛酸和复合维生素B等营养品,这反映了基于医生年龄和专业的差异。结论:一般来说,实践与指南一致,在特定的药物治疗上表现出强烈的共识。侵入性手术排名的差异,特别是在专家之间,导致了对其感知功效的质疑。这些不一致可能表明介入管理的专业水平不同,这些技术的可用性不同,或者对支持这些程序的现有证据的不同看法。保健品的使用表明了指南中潜在的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of neuropathic pain: a survey of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain.

Background: Neuropathic pain significantly impacts the quality of life. This study explores neuropathic pain management practices among members of the Italian Association for the Study of Pain (AISD).

Methods: During the 46th National Congress, 240 physicians affiliated with AISD were surveyed. The data included demographics, clinical settings, diagnostic procedures, treatment approaches, and preferences. The analysis utilized descriptive statistics, treatment rankings, and consensus evaluations.

Results: Respondents practicing in pain medicine reported the numbers of cases managed monthly. Neuropathic pain diagnoses relied on clinical findings corroborated by diagnostic tools. Treatment typically commenced within one to two weeks, emphasizing pharmacological interventions, which were often combined with invasive procedures. The leading pharmacological choices included gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Varied rankings were noted for invasive procedures, with nerve and neuraxial blocks particularly favored. Nutraceuticals such as palmitoylethanolamide, alpha-lipoic acid, and vitamin B complex were commonly prescribed, reflecting differences based on the physician's age and specialty.

Conclusions: Generally, practices aligned with guidelines, showing a strong consensus on specific pharmacological treatments. Discrepancies in the rankings of invasive procedures, particularly among specialists, have led to questions regarding their perceived efficacy. These inconsistencies may indicate varying levels of expertise in interventional management, differences in the availability of these techniques, or different views on the current evidence supporting these procedures. The use of nutraceuticals indicated potential gaps in the guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信