{"title":"奥玛单抗长期控制的重症哮喘患者的临床和医疗成本特征:与切换到其他生物制剂的患者的比较分析","authors":"Hironobu Sunadome, Hisako Matsumoto, Tadao Nagasaki, Yusuke Hayashi, Satoru Terada, Kenta Nishi, Natsuko Nomura, Mariko Kogo, Chie Morimoto, Tsuyoshi Oguma, Susumu Sato, Toyohiro Hirai","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S523832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Biologics are crucial for severe asthma treatment, but their high costs pose challenges. Omalizumab (OML) is dosed on the basis of patient-specific factors. The purpose of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics of severe asthmatics who maintain long-term control on omalizumab including healthcare cost considerations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Patients receiving OML at three institutions were enrolled. Patients continuing OML (C-OML) were compared with those switching to other biologics (S-OML) in terms of clinical background, cost-effectiveness, and type-2 inflammation levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The C-OML group achieved exacerbation control comparable to that of the S-OML group, with a median OML dose of 300 mg/month, resulting in significantly lower personal payments (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared with the S-OML group, the C-OML group had a greater prevalence of overweight (<i>p</i> = 0.04), a lower prevalence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and a trend toward a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Effective asthma control with OML was associated with nonsevere type-2 inflammation (eosinophils < 300/μL and FeNO < 50 ppb).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with nonsevere type-2 inflammation and a high BMI can achieve effective asthma control with OML, reducing treatment costs. Identifying this phenotype can improve the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1229-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Healthcare Cost Characteristics of Severe Asthma Patients with Long-Term Control on Omalizumab: A Comparative Analysis with Patients Who Switched to Other Biologics.\",\"authors\":\"Hironobu Sunadome, Hisako Matsumoto, Tadao Nagasaki, Yusuke Hayashi, Satoru Terada, Kenta Nishi, Natsuko Nomura, Mariko Kogo, Chie Morimoto, Tsuyoshi Oguma, Susumu Sato, Toyohiro Hirai\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JAA.S523832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Biologics are crucial for severe asthma treatment, but their high costs pose challenges. Omalizumab (OML) is dosed on the basis of patient-specific factors. The purpose of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics of severe asthmatics who maintain long-term control on omalizumab including healthcare cost considerations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Patients receiving OML at three institutions were enrolled. Patients continuing OML (C-OML) were compared with those switching to other biologics (S-OML) in terms of clinical background, cost-effectiveness, and type-2 inflammation levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The C-OML group achieved exacerbation control comparable to that of the S-OML group, with a median OML dose of 300 mg/month, resulting in significantly lower personal payments (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared with the S-OML group, the C-OML group had a greater prevalence of overweight (<i>p</i> = 0.04), a lower prevalence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and a trend toward a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Effective asthma control with OML was associated with nonsevere type-2 inflammation (eosinophils < 300/μL and FeNO < 50 ppb).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with nonsevere type-2 inflammation and a high BMI can achieve effective asthma control with OML, reducing treatment costs. Identifying this phenotype can improve the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1229-1237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S523832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S523832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and Healthcare Cost Characteristics of Severe Asthma Patients with Long-Term Control on Omalizumab: A Comparative Analysis with Patients Who Switched to Other Biologics.
Background and purpose: Biologics are crucial for severe asthma treatment, but their high costs pose challenges. Omalizumab (OML) is dosed on the basis of patient-specific factors. The purpose of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics of severe asthmatics who maintain long-term control on omalizumab including healthcare cost considerations.
Patients and methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Patients receiving OML at three institutions were enrolled. Patients continuing OML (C-OML) were compared with those switching to other biologics (S-OML) in terms of clinical background, cost-effectiveness, and type-2 inflammation levels.
Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The C-OML group achieved exacerbation control comparable to that of the S-OML group, with a median OML dose of 300 mg/month, resulting in significantly lower personal payments (p < 0.01). Compared with the S-OML group, the C-OML group had a greater prevalence of overweight (p = 0.04), a lower prevalence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (p < 0.01), and a trend toward a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis (p = 0.06). Effective asthma control with OML was associated with nonsevere type-2 inflammation (eosinophils < 300/μL and FeNO < 50 ppb).
Conclusion: Patients with nonsevere type-2 inflammation and a high BMI can achieve effective asthma control with OML, reducing treatment costs. Identifying this phenotype can improve the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for patients with severe asthma.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies.
Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.