利用去实施科学促进感染预防和管理:路线图和实际例子(第二部分第二部分)。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Westyn Branch-Elliman, Samira Reyes Dassum, Stephanie Stroever, Owen Albin, Lynne Batshon, Sandra Castejon-Ramirez, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Nkechi Emetuche, Rupak Datta, Mini Kamboj, Sarah L Krein, Milner Staub, Barry Rittmann, Felicia Scaggs Huang, Pranavi Sreeramoju, Geehan Suleyman, Joseph Y Ting, Lucy S Witt, Matthew J Ziegler, Jennie H Kwon
{"title":"利用去实施科学促进感染预防和管理:路线图和实际例子(第二部分第二部分)。","authors":"Westyn Branch-Elliman, Samira Reyes Dassum, Stephanie Stroever, Owen Albin, Lynne Batshon, Sandra Castejon-Ramirez, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Nkechi Emetuche, Rupak Datta, Mini Kamboj, Sarah L Krein, Milner Staub, Barry Rittmann, Felicia Scaggs Huang, Pranavi Sreeramoju, Geehan Suleyman, Joseph Y Ting, Lucy S Witt, Matthew J Ziegler, Jennie H Kwon","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>De-implementation of established practices is a common challenge in infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship and a necessary part of the life cycle of healthcare quality improvement programs. Promoting de-implementation of ineffective antimicrobial use and increasingly of low-value diagnostic testing are cornerstones of stewardship practice. Principles of de-implementation science and the interplay of implementation and de-implementation are discussed in part I of this Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America White Paper Series.In this second part of the series, we discuss a process for applying principles of de-implementation science in infection prevention and stewardship and then review some real-world examples and case studies, including a national blood culture shortage, contact precautions, and surgical and dental prophylaxis. We use these examples to demonstrate how barriers and facilitators can be mapped to evidence-informed implementation/de-implementation strategies to promote efforts to reduce low-value, ineffective, or out-of-date practices. These real-world examples highlight the need for infection prevention and stewardship programs to adapt to changing evidence, contexts, and conditions. Although barriers to practice change are often a bit different, de-implementation can sometimes be thought of as the implementation of a new program-but the new program aims to stop rather than start doing something.As the saying goes, sometimes less really is more. Medicine and public health have a strong action bias and a strong aversion to risk and uncertainty. Although our best intentions may point us to implementing more interventions, often, the best medicine instead dictates that we do less, or nothing at all. Leveraging principles of de-implementation science can help move healthcare in the right direction when interventions are low-value, ineffective, or no longer needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging de-implementation science to promote infection prevention and stewardship: a roadmap and practical examples (Part II of II).\",\"authors\":\"Westyn Branch-Elliman, Samira Reyes Dassum, Stephanie Stroever, Owen Albin, Lynne Batshon, Sandra Castejon-Ramirez, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Nkechi Emetuche, Rupak Datta, Mini Kamboj, Sarah L Krein, Milner Staub, Barry Rittmann, Felicia Scaggs Huang, Pranavi Sreeramoju, Geehan Suleyman, Joseph Y Ting, Lucy S Witt, Matthew J Ziegler, Jennie H Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>De-implementation of established practices is a common challenge in infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship and a necessary part of the life cycle of healthcare quality improvement programs. Promoting de-implementation of ineffective antimicrobial use and increasingly of low-value diagnostic testing are cornerstones of stewardship practice. Principles of de-implementation science and the interplay of implementation and de-implementation are discussed in part I of this Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America White Paper Series.In this second part of the series, we discuss a process for applying principles of de-implementation science in infection prevention and stewardship and then review some real-world examples and case studies, including a national blood culture shortage, contact precautions, and surgical and dental prophylaxis. We use these examples to demonstrate how barriers and facilitators can be mapped to evidence-informed implementation/de-implementation strategies to promote efforts to reduce low-value, ineffective, or out-of-date practices. These real-world examples highlight the need for infection prevention and stewardship programs to adapt to changing evidence, contexts, and conditions. Although barriers to practice change are often a bit different, de-implementation can sometimes be thought of as the implementation of a new program-but the new program aims to stop rather than start doing something.As the saying goes, sometimes less really is more. Medicine and public health have a strong action bias and a strong aversion to risk and uncertainty. Although our best intentions may point us to implementing more interventions, often, the best medicine instead dictates that we do less, or nothing at all. Leveraging principles of de-implementation science can help move healthcare in the right direction when interventions are low-value, ineffective, or no longer needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.76\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.76","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在感染预防和抗菌剂管理中,不执行既定做法是一个共同的挑战,也是医疗保健质量改进计划生命周期的必要组成部分。促进取消无效抗菌素使用和越来越多地使用低价值诊断检测是管理实践的基石。美国卫生保健流行病学协会白皮书系列的第一部分讨论了反实施科学的原则以及实施和反实施的相互作用。在本系列的第二部分中,我们讨论了在感染预防和管理中应用去实施科学原则的过程,然后回顾了一些现实世界的例子和案例研究,包括国家血培养短缺,接触预防措施以及外科和牙科预防。我们使用这些例子来展示如何将障碍和促进因素映射到循证实施/反实施战略中,以促进减少低价值、无效或过时做法的努力。这些现实世界的例子突出了感染预防和管理规划需要适应不断变化的证据、背景和条件。虽然实践改变的障碍通常有点不同,但去实施有时可以被认为是一个新计划的实施——但新计划的目的是停止而不是开始做某事。俗话说,有时候少即是多。医学和公共卫生有强烈的行动偏见和对风险和不确定性的强烈厌恶。尽管我们最好的意图可能会让我们实施更多的干预措施,但通常情况下,最好的药物却要求我们做得更少,或者什么都不做。在干预措施价值低、无效或不再需要的情况下,利用反实施科学原则可以帮助医疗保健朝着正确的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging de-implementation science to promote infection prevention and stewardship: a roadmap and practical examples (Part II of II).

De-implementation of established practices is a common challenge in infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship and a necessary part of the life cycle of healthcare quality improvement programs. Promoting de-implementation of ineffective antimicrobial use and increasingly of low-value diagnostic testing are cornerstones of stewardship practice. Principles of de-implementation science and the interplay of implementation and de-implementation are discussed in part I of this Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America White Paper Series.In this second part of the series, we discuss a process for applying principles of de-implementation science in infection prevention and stewardship and then review some real-world examples and case studies, including a national blood culture shortage, contact precautions, and surgical and dental prophylaxis. We use these examples to demonstrate how barriers and facilitators can be mapped to evidence-informed implementation/de-implementation strategies to promote efforts to reduce low-value, ineffective, or out-of-date practices. These real-world examples highlight the need for infection prevention and stewardship programs to adapt to changing evidence, contexts, and conditions. Although barriers to practice change are often a bit different, de-implementation can sometimes be thought of as the implementation of a new program-but the new program aims to stop rather than start doing something.As the saying goes, sometimes less really is more. Medicine and public health have a strong action bias and a strong aversion to risk and uncertainty. Although our best intentions may point us to implementing more interventions, often, the best medicine instead dictates that we do less, or nothing at all. Leveraging principles of de-implementation science can help move healthcare in the right direction when interventions are low-value, ineffective, or no longer needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信