急诊科医师专业与首次插管成功率的关系。

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lucas Oliveira J E Silva, Rafael Von Hellmann, Bruno A M Pinheiro Besen, Julia M Dorn de Carvalho, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Daniel Pedrollo, Caio Goncalves Nogueira, Natalia Mansur P Figueiredo, Carlos Henrique Miranda, Danilo Martins, Thiago Dias Baumgratz, Bruno Bergesch, Diogo Costa, Osmar Colleoni, Juliana Zanettini, Ana Paula Freitas, Nicole Pinheiro Moreira, Patricia Lopes Gaspar, Renato Tambelli, Maria Cristina Costa, Samara Silveira, Wilsterman Correia, Rafael Garcia de Maria, Ubirajara A Vinholes Filho, Andre P Weber, Vinicius da Silva Castro, Carlos Fernando D Dornelles, Barbara S Tabach, Hélio P Guimarães, Gabriela Stanzani, Thiago F Gava, Aidan Mullan, Gabriel Petrin Alonso Silva, Giovanna Cardoso de Oliveira, Benjamin J Sandefur, Fernanda Bellolio, Julio C G Alencar, Ian Ward A Maia
{"title":"急诊科医师专业与首次插管成功率的关系。","authors":"Lucas Oliveira J E Silva, Rafael Von Hellmann, Bruno A M Pinheiro Besen, Julia M Dorn de Carvalho, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Daniel Pedrollo, Caio Goncalves Nogueira, Natalia Mansur P Figueiredo, Carlos Henrique Miranda, Danilo Martins, Thiago Dias Baumgratz, Bruno Bergesch, Diogo Costa, Osmar Colleoni, Juliana Zanettini, Ana Paula Freitas, Nicole Pinheiro Moreira, Patricia Lopes Gaspar, Renato Tambelli, Maria Cristina Costa, Samara Silveira, Wilsterman Correia, Rafael Garcia de Maria, Ubirajara A Vinholes Filho, Andre P Weber, Vinicius da Silva Castro, Carlos Fernando D Dornelles, Barbara S Tabach, Hélio P Guimarães, Gabriela Stanzani, Thiago F Gava, Aidan Mullan, Gabriel Petrin Alonso Silva, Giovanna Cardoso de Oliveira, Benjamin J Sandefur, Fernanda Bellolio, Julio C G Alencar, Ian Ward A Maia","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Emergency airway management in the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk procedure associated with patient outcomes. First-attempt success is a widely recognized quality metric, as multiple attempts are associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation complications. In Brazil, where emergency medicine is a recently established specialty, many ED are staffed by physicians without formal emergency medicine training. The association between emergency medicine training and intubation outcomes in this setting has not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of physician specialty with first-attempt success and immediate peri-intubation complications in Brazilian EDs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>This study included adult patients who underwent tracheal intubation in EDs between March 2022 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if the intubation occurred outside the ED, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or for elective procedures. Intubations performed by medical students were also excluded. Physicians were categorized by specialty as emergency medicine or nonemergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was first-attempt success; secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications (severe hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between physician specialty and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 2582 patients, 1087 (42.1%) were intubated by emergency physicians and 1495 (57.9%) by other physicians (mainly internal medicine and surgery). Intubations by emergency physicians were associated with a higher rate of first-attempt success [80.4 vs. 70.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.97]. There was also a higher odds of intubations without major complications (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, there was a higher rate of first-attempt success in intubations performed by board-certified emergency physicians compared with other physicians working in Brazilian EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between physician specialty and first-attempt intubation success in the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Oliveira J E Silva, Rafael Von Hellmann, Bruno A M Pinheiro Besen, Julia M Dorn de Carvalho, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Daniel Pedrollo, Caio Goncalves Nogueira, Natalia Mansur P Figueiredo, Carlos Henrique Miranda, Danilo Martins, Thiago Dias Baumgratz, Bruno Bergesch, Diogo Costa, Osmar Colleoni, Juliana Zanettini, Ana Paula Freitas, Nicole Pinheiro Moreira, Patricia Lopes Gaspar, Renato Tambelli, Maria Cristina Costa, Samara Silveira, Wilsterman Correia, Rafael Garcia de Maria, Ubirajara A Vinholes Filho, Andre P Weber, Vinicius da Silva Castro, Carlos Fernando D Dornelles, Barbara S Tabach, Hélio P Guimarães, Gabriela Stanzani, Thiago F Gava, Aidan Mullan, Gabriel Petrin Alonso Silva, Giovanna Cardoso de Oliveira, Benjamin J Sandefur, Fernanda Bellolio, Julio C G Alencar, Ian Ward A Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Emergency airway management in the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk procedure associated with patient outcomes. First-attempt success is a widely recognized quality metric, as multiple attempts are associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation complications. In Brazil, where emergency medicine is a recently established specialty, many ED are staffed by physicians without formal emergency medicine training. The association between emergency medicine training and intubation outcomes in this setting has not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of physician specialty with first-attempt success and immediate peri-intubation complications in Brazilian EDs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>This study included adult patients who underwent tracheal intubation in EDs between March 2022 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if the intubation occurred outside the ED, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or for elective procedures. Intubations performed by medical students were also excluded. Physicians were categorized by specialty as emergency medicine or nonemergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was first-attempt success; secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications (severe hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between physician specialty and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 2582 patients, 1087 (42.1%) were intubated by emergency physicians and 1495 (57.9%) by other physicians (mainly internal medicine and surgery). Intubations by emergency physicians were associated with a higher rate of first-attempt success [80.4 vs. 70.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.97]. There was also a higher odds of intubations without major complications (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, there was a higher rate of first-attempt success in intubations performed by board-certified emergency physicians compared with other physicians working in Brazilian EDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性:急诊科(ED)的紧急气道管理是与患者预后相关的高风险程序。首次尝试成功是一个被广泛认可的质量指标,因为多次尝试与插管周围并发症的风险增加有关。在巴西,急诊医学是一个新近成立的专业,许多急诊科的工作人员都没有接受过正式的急诊医学培训。在这种情况下,急诊医学培训和插管结果之间的关系尚未得到很好的表征。目的:评估巴西急诊科医师专业与首次尝试成功和即时插管周围并发症的关系。设计:对巴西气道登记合作组织的一项多中心前瞻性队列研究进行二次分析。环境和参与者:该研究包括2022年3月至2024年4月期间在急诊科接受气管插管的成年患者。如果插管发生在急诊科外、心肺复苏期间或选择性手术,则排除患者。医学生插管也被排除在外。医生按专业分为急诊医学和非急诊医学。结果测量与分析:主要结果为首次尝试成功;次要结局包括插管周围并发症(严重低氧血症、血流动力学不稳定和心脏骤停)。多变量逻辑回归用于评估医师专业与结果之间的关系。主要结果:2582例患者中,急诊医师插管1087例(42.1%),其他医师(以内科和外科为主)插管1495例(57.9%)。急诊医师插管与较高的首次尝试成功率相关[80.4比70.9%,调整优势比[aOR]: 1.63, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.34-1.97]。插管无主要并发症的几率也较高(aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42)。结论:在这项研究中,与在巴西急诊室工作的其他医生相比,由委员会认证的急诊医生进行插管的首次尝试成功率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between physician specialty and first-attempt intubation success in the emergency department.

Background and importance: Emergency airway management in the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk procedure associated with patient outcomes. First-attempt success is a widely recognized quality metric, as multiple attempts are associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation complications. In Brazil, where emergency medicine is a recently established specialty, many ED are staffed by physicians without formal emergency medicine training. The association between emergency medicine training and intubation outcomes in this setting has not been well characterized.

Objective: To assess the association of physician specialty with first-attempt success and immediate peri-intubation complications in Brazilian EDs.

Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation.

Setting and participants: This study included adult patients who underwent tracheal intubation in EDs between March 2022 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if the intubation occurred outside the ED, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or for elective procedures. Intubations performed by medical students were also excluded. Physicians were categorized by specialty as emergency medicine or nonemergency medicine.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was first-attempt success; secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications (severe hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between physician specialty and outcomes.

Main results: Among 2582 patients, 1087 (42.1%) were intubated by emergency physicians and 1495 (57.9%) by other physicians (mainly internal medicine and surgery). Intubations by emergency physicians were associated with a higher rate of first-attempt success [80.4 vs. 70.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.97]. There was also a higher odds of intubations without major complications (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42).

Conclusion: In this study, there was a higher rate of first-attempt success in intubations performed by board-certified emergency physicians compared with other physicians working in Brazilian EDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信