跨欧洲二次使用健康数据的用户旅程:欧洲健康数据空间之前的见解。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rachel B Forster, Eva Garcia Alvarez, Adrian G Zucco, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Gayo Diallo, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Andrea Ganna, Madeleine Gorman-Asal, Christina Hilmarsen, Petr Holub, Klaus Hoeyer, Arti Rawat, Naja H Rod, Anna-Leena Vuorinen, Tibor V Varga
{"title":"跨欧洲二次使用健康数据的用户旅程:欧洲健康数据空间之前的见解。","authors":"Rachel B Forster, Eva Garcia Alvarez, Adrian G Zucco, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Gayo Diallo, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Andrea Ganna, Madeleine Gorman-Asal, Christina Hilmarsen, Petr Holub, Klaus Hoeyer, Arti Rawat, Naja H Rod, Anna-Leena Vuorinen, Tibor V Varga","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation aims to facilitate cross-border sharing of health data across Europe. However, practical challenges related to data access, interoperability, quality, and interpretive competence remain, particularly when working with health systems across countries. This study aimed to evaluate and report the user journey of researchers accessing and utilizing health data across four European countries for secondary research purposes prior to implementation of EHDS. We conducted a narrative reflection of individual and collective experiences on key aspects of the user journey-discovery, access, use, and finalization. Data were gathered from various structured and unstructured sources, including an online log, prospective questionnaires, regular meetings, and interviews. Researchers faced challenges at different steps of the user journey, which included lack of data quality in national metadata catalogues (discovery stage). Differences in national regulations led to inconsistent timelines for gaining access to data (access stage), with approval times ranging from a few months to over a year. At the use stage, researchers experienced challenges in harmonizing health data due to variations in coding practices and data quality. Issues related to computational capacity caused further delays. Substantial challenges must be addressed for EHDS to succeed. Establishing knowledge hubs, fostering collaborations, and streamlining access processes are essential. Close collaboration with experts will likely be essential for an effective user journey. This analysis underscores the importance of collaboration, analytical reproducibility, and clear documentation to ensure the success and timely delivery of cross-border projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"35 Supplement_3","pages":"iii18-iii24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User journeys in cross-European secondary use of health data: insights ahead of the European Health Data Space.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel B Forster, Eva Garcia Alvarez, Adrian G Zucco, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Gayo Diallo, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Andrea Ganna, Madeleine Gorman-Asal, Christina Hilmarsen, Petr Holub, Klaus Hoeyer, Arti Rawat, Naja H Rod, Anna-Leena Vuorinen, Tibor V Varga\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation aims to facilitate cross-border sharing of health data across Europe. However, practical challenges related to data access, interoperability, quality, and interpretive competence remain, particularly when working with health systems across countries. This study aimed to evaluate and report the user journey of researchers accessing and utilizing health data across four European countries for secondary research purposes prior to implementation of EHDS. We conducted a narrative reflection of individual and collective experiences on key aspects of the user journey-discovery, access, use, and finalization. Data were gathered from various structured and unstructured sources, including an online log, prospective questionnaires, regular meetings, and interviews. Researchers faced challenges at different steps of the user journey, which included lack of data quality in national metadata catalogues (discovery stage). Differences in national regulations led to inconsistent timelines for gaining access to data (access stage), with approval times ranging from a few months to over a year. At the use stage, researchers experienced challenges in harmonizing health data due to variations in coding practices and data quality. Issues related to computational capacity caused further delays. Substantial challenges must be addressed for EHDS to succeed. Establishing knowledge hubs, fostering collaborations, and streamlining access processes are essential. Close collaboration with experts will likely be essential for an effective user journey. This analysis underscores the importance of collaboration, analytical reproducibility, and clear documentation to ensure the success and timely delivery of cross-border projects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"35 Supplement_3\",\"pages\":\"iii18-iii24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)法规旨在促进整个欧洲健康数据的跨境共享。然而,与数据获取、互操作性、质量和解释能力相关的实际挑战仍然存在,特别是在与各国卫生系统合作时。本研究旨在评估和报告四个欧洲国家的研究人员在实施EHDS之前为二级研究目的访问和利用健康数据的用户旅程。我们对用户旅程的关键方面——发现、访问、使用和最终完成——进行了个人和集体体验的叙述反映。从各种结构化和非结构化来源收集数据,包括在线日志、前瞻性问卷调查、定期会议和访谈。研究人员在用户旅程的不同阶段面临挑战,其中包括在国家元数据目录中缺乏数据质量(发现阶段)。各国法规的差异导致获取数据(访问阶段)的时间表不一致,审批时间从几个月到一年多不等。在使用阶段,由于编码实践和数据质量的差异,研究人员在协调健康数据方面遇到了挑战。与计算能力有关的问题导致了进一步的延迟。EHDS要想取得成功,必须解决一些重大挑战。建立知识中心、促进合作和简化获取流程至关重要。与专家的密切合作可能对有效的用户旅程至关重要。这一分析强调了协作、分析重现性和清晰文档的重要性,以确保跨境项目的成功和及时交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

User journeys in cross-European secondary use of health data: insights ahead of the European Health Data Space.

User journeys in cross-European secondary use of health data: insights ahead of the European Health Data Space.

User journeys in cross-European secondary use of health data: insights ahead of the European Health Data Space.

The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation aims to facilitate cross-border sharing of health data across Europe. However, practical challenges related to data access, interoperability, quality, and interpretive competence remain, particularly when working with health systems across countries. This study aimed to evaluate and report the user journey of researchers accessing and utilizing health data across four European countries for secondary research purposes prior to implementation of EHDS. We conducted a narrative reflection of individual and collective experiences on key aspects of the user journey-discovery, access, use, and finalization. Data were gathered from various structured and unstructured sources, including an online log, prospective questionnaires, regular meetings, and interviews. Researchers faced challenges at different steps of the user journey, which included lack of data quality in national metadata catalogues (discovery stage). Differences in national regulations led to inconsistent timelines for gaining access to data (access stage), with approval times ranging from a few months to over a year. At the use stage, researchers experienced challenges in harmonizing health data due to variations in coding practices and data quality. Issues related to computational capacity caused further delays. Substantial challenges must be addressed for EHDS to succeed. Establishing knowledge hubs, fostering collaborations, and streamlining access processes are essential. Close collaboration with experts will likely be essential for an effective user journey. This analysis underscores the importance of collaboration, analytical reproducibility, and clear documentation to ensure the success and timely delivery of cross-border projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信