截骨后全膝关节置换术与不截骨的首次全膝关节置换术相比,生存率较低,手术复杂性较高,但在身体功能和疼痛方面没有差异:荷兰关节置换术登记的189,932例手术分析。

IF 5
Maarten R Huizinga, Astrid J de Vries, Liza N van Steenbergen, Reinoud W Brouwer
{"title":"截骨后全膝关节置换术与不截骨的首次全膝关节置换术相比,生存率较低,手术复杂性较高,但在身体功能和疼痛方面没有差异:荷兰关节置换术登记的189,932例手术分析。","authors":"Maarten R Huizinga, Astrid J de Vries, Liza N van Steenbergen, Reinoud W Brouwer","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following an osteotomy around the knee might be technically more challenging and yield inferior outcome compared with primary TKA. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival, use of revision components and clinical outcome of TKAs postosteotomy compared with primary TKAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register who underwent TKA after osteotomy or primary TKA with osteoarthritis as primary diagnosis from 2007 to 2022 and aged ≥18 years at the time of the procedure were selected. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate the survival and hazard ratio (HR) for revision. The use of TKA revision components was analysed and used as stratification factor. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Numeric Rating Scale for pain at rest and during activity, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form and Oxford knee score) were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher survival of the TKA until 15-year follow-up was found in primary TKAs, with a median survival of 4.1 years (interquartile range 5.0) compared to TKAs following osteotomy. The proportion of TKA revision components was higher after a previous osteotomy (2.5 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). A higher TKA revision risk was found in the primary component group after a previous osteotomy compared to primary TKAs (HR: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.35). The use of revision components increased the risk for a TKA revision in both groups. No differences in PROMs between groups were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that a previous osteotomy is associated with decreased implant survival in subsequent TKAs, especially if a TKA component with stems and/or augmentations was used.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower survival, higher surgical complexity, but no difference in physical functioning and pain in total knee arthroplasty following osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty without osteotomy: Analysis of 189,932 procedures of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.\",\"authors\":\"Maarten R Huizinga, Astrid J de Vries, Liza N van Steenbergen, Reinoud W Brouwer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following an osteotomy around the knee might be technically more challenging and yield inferior outcome compared with primary TKA. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival, use of revision components and clinical outcome of TKAs postosteotomy compared with primary TKAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register who underwent TKA after osteotomy or primary TKA with osteoarthritis as primary diagnosis from 2007 to 2022 and aged ≥18 years at the time of the procedure were selected. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate the survival and hazard ratio (HR) for revision. The use of TKA revision components was analysed and used as stratification factor. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Numeric Rating Scale for pain at rest and during activity, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form and Oxford knee score) were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher survival of the TKA until 15-year follow-up was found in primary TKAs, with a median survival of 4.1 years (interquartile range 5.0) compared to TKAs following osteotomy. The proportion of TKA revision components was higher after a previous osteotomy (2.5 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). A higher TKA revision risk was found in the primary component group after a previous osteotomy compared to primary TKAs (HR: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.35). The use of revision components increased the risk for a TKA revision in both groups. No differences in PROMs between groups were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that a previous osteotomy is associated with decreased implant survival in subsequent TKAs, especially if a TKA component with stems and/or augmentations was used.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与原发性全膝关节置换术相比,膝关节周围截骨术后的全膝关节置换术在技术上更具挑战性,且预后较差。本研究的目的是研究与原发tka相比,tka在截骨后的生存率、翻修组件的使用和临床结果。方法:选择2007年至2022年在荷兰关节成形术登记册中接受截骨后TKA或原发性TKA合并骨关节炎作为主要诊断的患者,手术时年龄≥18岁。Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox比例风险回归分析用于估计生存率和风险比(HR)。分析了TKA修正分量的使用情况,并将其作为分层因子。术前、术后6个月和12个月评估患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)(休息和活动时疼痛数值评定量表、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分、身体功能简表和牛津膝关节评分)。结果:与截骨后的TKA相比,原发性TKA的15年随访期生存率显著提高,中位生存率为4.1年(四分位数间差5.0)。结论:本研究表明,先前的截骨术与后续TKA种植体存活率降低有关,特别是如果使用了带茎和/或增强物的TKA假体。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lower survival, higher surgical complexity, but no difference in physical functioning and pain in total knee arthroplasty following osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty without osteotomy: Analysis of 189,932 procedures of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following an osteotomy around the knee might be technically more challenging and yield inferior outcome compared with primary TKA. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival, use of revision components and clinical outcome of TKAs postosteotomy compared with primary TKAs.

Methods: Patients from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register who underwent TKA after osteotomy or primary TKA with osteoarthritis as primary diagnosis from 2007 to 2022 and aged ≥18 years at the time of the procedure were selected. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate the survival and hazard ratio (HR) for revision. The use of TKA revision components was analysed and used as stratification factor. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Numeric Rating Scale for pain at rest and during activity, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form and Oxford knee score) were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: A significantly higher survival of the TKA until 15-year follow-up was found in primary TKAs, with a median survival of 4.1 years (interquartile range 5.0) compared to TKAs following osteotomy. The proportion of TKA revision components was higher after a previous osteotomy (2.5 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). A higher TKA revision risk was found in the primary component group after a previous osteotomy compared to primary TKAs (HR: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.35). The use of revision components increased the risk for a TKA revision in both groups. No differences in PROMs between groups were found.

Conclusion: This study showed that a previous osteotomy is associated with decreased implant survival in subsequent TKAs, especially if a TKA component with stems and/or augmentations was used.

Level of evidence: Level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信