{"title":"基于图像的机器人技术提高横向UKA的精度和效率:135个UKA的比较研究。","authors":"Clément Favroul, Cécile Batailler, Elsayed Ahmed Abdelatif, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains technically demanding due to the complex biomechanics of the lateral compartment. Image-based (IBRA) and imageless (ILRA) robotic systems have both demonstrated superior accuracy compared to conventional mechanical instrumentation, but have not yet been directly compared in lateral UKA. This study aimed to evaluate their respective accuracy and surgical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 135 patients who underwent lateral UKA using either IBRA or ILRA systems. Post-operative radiographic outcomes included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment, posterior tibial slope (PTS) and joint line (JL) restoration. Surgical time was assessed as a secondary outcome. Target zones were HKA 180°-185°, PTS 2°-8° and JL ± 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IBRA showed higher rates of HKA inliers (94.9% vs. 78.9%, p = 0.011) and JL restoration (76.2% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) compared to ILRA. PTS accuracy was similar between groups (p = 0.30). Operative time was significantly shorter with IBRA (61.6 ± 13.5 vs. 81.9 ± 26.1 min, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBRA outperformed ILRA in terms of alignment accuracy and surgical duration. These findings support the added value of IBRA systems in lateral UKA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image-based robotics enhance precision and efficiency in lateral UKA: A comparative study of 135 UKAs.\",\"authors\":\"Clément Favroul, Cécile Batailler, Elsayed Ahmed Abdelatif, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains technically demanding due to the complex biomechanics of the lateral compartment. Image-based (IBRA) and imageless (ILRA) robotic systems have both demonstrated superior accuracy compared to conventional mechanical instrumentation, but have not yet been directly compared in lateral UKA. This study aimed to evaluate their respective accuracy and surgical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 135 patients who underwent lateral UKA using either IBRA or ILRA systems. Post-operative radiographic outcomes included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment, posterior tibial slope (PTS) and joint line (JL) restoration. Surgical time was assessed as a secondary outcome. Target zones were HKA 180°-185°, PTS 2°-8° and JL ± 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IBRA showed higher rates of HKA inliers (94.9% vs. 78.9%, p = 0.011) and JL restoration (76.2% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) compared to ILRA. PTS accuracy was similar between groups (p = 0.30). Operative time was significantly shorter with IBRA (61.6 ± 13.5 vs. 81.9 ± 26.1 min, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBRA outperformed ILRA in terms of alignment accuracy and surgical duration. These findings support the added value of IBRA systems in lateral UKA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:机器人辅助的外侧单腔膝关节置换术(UKA)由于外侧腔室复杂的生物力学,在技术上仍然要求很高。与传统机械仪器相比,基于图像的(IBRA)和无图像的(ILRA)机器人系统都显示出更高的精度,但尚未在横向UKA中进行直接比较。本研究旨在评估其准确性和手术效率。方法:本回顾性研究包括135例使用IBRA或ILRA系统进行侧位UKA的患者。术后x线检查结果包括髋关节-膝关节-踝关节(HKA)对齐,胫骨后坡(PTS)和关节线(JL)恢复。手术时间作为次要结果进行评估。靶区为HKA 180°~ 185°,PTS 2°~ 8°,JL±2 mm。结果:IBRA具有较高的HKA嵌套率(94.9% vs. 78.9%, p = 0.011)和JL修复率(76.2% vs. 31.6%, p)。结论:IBRA在对准精度和手术时间方面优于ILRA。这些发现支持IBRA系统在横向UKA中的附加价值。证据等级:四级,回顾性病例系列研究。
Image-based robotics enhance precision and efficiency in lateral UKA: A comparative study of 135 UKAs.
Purpose: Robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains technically demanding due to the complex biomechanics of the lateral compartment. Image-based (IBRA) and imageless (ILRA) robotic systems have both demonstrated superior accuracy compared to conventional mechanical instrumentation, but have not yet been directly compared in lateral UKA. This study aimed to evaluate their respective accuracy and surgical efficiency.
Methods: This retrospective study included 135 patients who underwent lateral UKA using either IBRA or ILRA systems. Post-operative radiographic outcomes included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment, posterior tibial slope (PTS) and joint line (JL) restoration. Surgical time was assessed as a secondary outcome. Target zones were HKA 180°-185°, PTS 2°-8° and JL ± 2 mm.
Results: IBRA showed higher rates of HKA inliers (94.9% vs. 78.9%, p = 0.011) and JL restoration (76.2% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) compared to ILRA. PTS accuracy was similar between groups (p = 0.30). Operative time was significantly shorter with IBRA (61.6 ± 13.5 vs. 81.9 ± 26.1 min, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: IBRA outperformed ILRA in terms of alignment accuracy and surgical duration. These findings support the added value of IBRA systems in lateral UKA.
Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series study.