Amelia Yazidjoglou, Christina Watts, Grace Joshy, Sam Egger, Emily Banks, Becky Freeman
{"title":"澳大利亚青少年对电子烟的健康认知和从不吸电子烟:对横断面调查数据的基于强度的分析。","authors":"Amelia Yazidjoglou, Christina Watts, Grace Joshy, Sam Egger, Emily Banks, Becky Freeman","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-002414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Curbing adolescent vaping is a public health priority and little evidence exists examining protective factors. Using a strength-based approach, this study explored the relationship between adolescent vaping health perceptions and vaping use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 9000 Australian adolescents aged 14-17 years recruited via multiple online panels as part of the Generation Vape Study were used. Logistic regression compared never vs ever vaping, and inversed multinomial logistic regression compared never vaping to four lifetime vaping categories (ranging from use on a few to >100 occasions) for eight health perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 66% (5948/9000) of participants reported never vaping. Within all vaping categories, most agreed that vapes are unsafe, can harm the lungs and brain and can cause addiction, and disagreed that nicotine is harmless. Compared with those who disagreed/strongly disagreed, the odds of never vs ever vaping were greater among those who agreed/strongly agreed that vapes are unsafe to use (adjusted OR=2.67; 95% CI 2.17 to 3.27), can harm the developing brain (2.61; 2.05 to 3.33), can damage the lungs (1.61; 1.23 to 2.10), can cause addiction (2.32; 1.79 to 3.00) and that they are unsafe to use around others (2.94; 2.48 to 3.49). Compared with those who agreed/strongly agreed that nicotine is harmless, there were greater odds of never use (vs ever use) among those who disagreed/strongly disagreed (1.75; 1.44 to 2.11). The protective relationship remained across different lifetime vaping categories. Neither agreeing nor disagreeing was not generally a factor protective against vaping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceptions of vape harms appear protective against experimental and regular vaping. Young people vape despite the majority of users being aware of harms, suggesting knowledge alone is an unlikely driver of behaviour. Comprehensive control efforts that embrace a suite of actions including education, policy, enforcement and monitoring activities are needed to best protect adolescent health.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e002414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaping health perceptions and never vaping among Australian adolescents: a strength-based analysis of cross-sectional survey data.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Yazidjoglou, Christina Watts, Grace Joshy, Sam Egger, Emily Banks, Becky Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-002414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Curbing adolescent vaping is a public health priority and little evidence exists examining protective factors. Using a strength-based approach, this study explored the relationship between adolescent vaping health perceptions and vaping use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 9000 Australian adolescents aged 14-17 years recruited via multiple online panels as part of the Generation Vape Study were used. Logistic regression compared never vs ever vaping, and inversed multinomial logistic regression compared never vaping to four lifetime vaping categories (ranging from use on a few to >100 occasions) for eight health perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 66% (5948/9000) of participants reported never vaping. Within all vaping categories, most agreed that vapes are unsafe, can harm the lungs and brain and can cause addiction, and disagreed that nicotine is harmless. Compared with those who disagreed/strongly disagreed, the odds of never vs ever vaping were greater among those who agreed/strongly agreed that vapes are unsafe to use (adjusted OR=2.67; 95% CI 2.17 to 3.27), can harm the developing brain (2.61; 2.05 to 3.33), can damage the lungs (1.61; 1.23 to 2.10), can cause addiction (2.32; 1.79 to 3.00) and that they are unsafe to use around others (2.94; 2.48 to 3.49). Compared with those who agreed/strongly agreed that nicotine is harmless, there were greater odds of never use (vs ever use) among those who disagreed/strongly disagreed (1.75; 1.44 to 2.11). The protective relationship remained across different lifetime vaping categories. Neither agreeing nor disagreeing was not generally a factor protective against vaping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceptions of vape harms appear protective against experimental and regular vaping. Young people vape despite the majority of users being aware of harms, suggesting knowledge alone is an unlikely driver of behaviour. Comprehensive control efforts that embrace a suite of actions including education, policy, enforcement and monitoring activities are needed to best protect adolescent health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e002414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-002414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-002414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:导言:控制青少年吸电子烟是公共卫生的优先事项,但很少有证据表明存在保护因素。本研究采用基于力量的方法,探讨了青少年对电子烟健康的看法与电子烟使用之间的关系。方法:使用来自9000名14-17岁的澳大利亚青少年的横断面数据,这些青少年是通过多个在线小组招募的,作为“一代电子烟研究”的一部分。逻辑回归比较了从不吸电子烟和从不吸电子烟,逆多项式逻辑回归比较了从不吸电子烟和四种终身吸电子烟类别(从使用几次到使用100次)对八种健康感知的影响。结果:总体而言,66%(5948/9000)的参与者报告从不吸电子烟。在所有电子烟类别中,大多数人都认为电子烟是不安全的,会伤害肺部和大脑,并可能导致上瘾,而不同意尼古丁是无害的。与那些不同意/强烈不同意的人相比,那些同意/强烈同意电子烟使用不安全的人(调整后的OR=2.67; 95% CI 2.17至3.27)、可能损害发育中的大脑(2.61;2.05至3.33)、可能损害肺部(1.61;1.23至2.10)、可能导致成瘾(2.32;1.79至3.00)和在他人周围使用不安全(2.94;2.48至3.49)的人从不吸电子烟和从不吸电子烟的几率更大。与那些同意/强烈同意尼古丁无害的人相比,那些不同意/强烈不同意的人从不使用尼古丁(比曾经使用过)的几率更大(1.75;1.44对2.11)。这种保护关系在不同的终身电子烟类别中仍然存在。一般来说,同意或不同意都不是防止吸电子烟的因素。结论:对电子烟危害的认知似乎对实验性和常规电子烟有保护作用。尽管大多数用户都知道电子烟的危害,但年轻人还是吸电子烟,这表明知识本身不太可能成为行为的驱动因素。需要全面的控制努力,包括一整套行动,包括教育、政策、执法和监测活动,以最好地保护青少年健康。
Vaping health perceptions and never vaping among Australian adolescents: a strength-based analysis of cross-sectional survey data.
Abstract:
Introduction: Curbing adolescent vaping is a public health priority and little evidence exists examining protective factors. Using a strength-based approach, this study explored the relationship between adolescent vaping health perceptions and vaping use.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from 9000 Australian adolescents aged 14-17 years recruited via multiple online panels as part of the Generation Vape Study were used. Logistic regression compared never vs ever vaping, and inversed multinomial logistic regression compared never vaping to four lifetime vaping categories (ranging from use on a few to >100 occasions) for eight health perceptions.
Results: Overall, 66% (5948/9000) of participants reported never vaping. Within all vaping categories, most agreed that vapes are unsafe, can harm the lungs and brain and can cause addiction, and disagreed that nicotine is harmless. Compared with those who disagreed/strongly disagreed, the odds of never vs ever vaping were greater among those who agreed/strongly agreed that vapes are unsafe to use (adjusted OR=2.67; 95% CI 2.17 to 3.27), can harm the developing brain (2.61; 2.05 to 3.33), can damage the lungs (1.61; 1.23 to 2.10), can cause addiction (2.32; 1.79 to 3.00) and that they are unsafe to use around others (2.94; 2.48 to 3.49). Compared with those who agreed/strongly agreed that nicotine is harmless, there were greater odds of never use (vs ever use) among those who disagreed/strongly disagreed (1.75; 1.44 to 2.11). The protective relationship remained across different lifetime vaping categories. Neither agreeing nor disagreeing was not generally a factor protective against vaping.
Conclusion: Perceptions of vape harms appear protective against experimental and regular vaping. Young people vape despite the majority of users being aware of harms, suggesting knowledge alone is an unlikely driver of behaviour. Comprehensive control efforts that embrace a suite of actions including education, policy, enforcement and monitoring activities are needed to best protect adolescent health.